These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38309041)

  • 1. When intuitive Bayesians need to be good readers: The problem-wording effect on Bayesian reasoning.
    Sirota M; Navarrete G; Juanchich M
    Cognition; 2024 Apr; 245():105722. PubMed ID: 38309041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Now you Bayes, now you don't: effects of set-problem and frequency-format mental representations on statistical reasoning.
    Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1465-73. PubMed ID: 25711182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adding up to good Bayesian reasoning: Problem format manipulations and individual skill differences.
    Brase GL; Hill WT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Apr; 146(4):577-591. PubMed ID: 28383994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intuitive reasoning about probability: theoretical and experimental analyses of the "problem of three prisoners".
    Shimojo S; Ichikawa SI
    Cognition; 1989 Jun; 32(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 2752704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Another chance for good reasoning.
    Pighin S; Tentori K; Girotto V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1995-2002. PubMed ID: 28265865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency interpretation of ambiguous statistical information facilitates Bayesian reasoning.
    Brase GL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Apr; 15(2):284-9. PubMed ID: 18488641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of the effect of natural frequencies on Bayesian reasoning.
    McDowell M; Jacobs P
    Psychol Bull; 2017 Dec; 143(12):1273-1312. PubMed ID: 29048176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to train your Bayesian: a problem-representation transfer rather than a format-representation shift explains training effects.
    Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 25283723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of problem domain on Bayesian inferences: A systematic investigation.
    Pighin S; Filimon F; Tentori K
    Mem Cognit; 2024 May; 52(4):735-751. PubMed ID: 38200204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A description-experience gap in statistical intuitions: Of smart babies, risk-savvy chimps, intuitive statisticians, and stupid grown-ups.
    Schulze C; Hertwig R
    Cognition; 2021 May; 210():104580. PubMed ID: 33667974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Natural frequency trees improve diagnostic efficiency in Bayesian reasoning.
    Binder K; Krauss S; Schmidmaier R; Braun LT
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2021 Aug; 26(3):847-863. PubMed ID: 33599875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why Can Only 24% Solve Bayesian Reasoning Problems in Natural Frequencies: Frequency Phobia in Spite of Probability Blindness.
    Weber P; Binder K; Krauss S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1833. PubMed ID: 30369891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structural mapping in statistical word problems: A relational reasoning approach to Bayesian inference.
    Johnson ED; Tubau E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):964-971. PubMed ID: 27678378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On Bayesian problem-solving: helping Bayesians solve simple Bayesian word problems.
    Sirota M; Vallée-Tourangeau G; Vallée-Tourangeau F; Juanchich M
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1141. PubMed ID: 26321977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beliefs and Bayesian reasoning.
    Cohen AL; Sidlowski S; Staub A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):972-978. PubMed ID: 27604495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measures of Bayesian Reasoning Performance on 'Normal' and 'Natural' Frequency Tasks.
    Stock R; Fisk JE; Montgomery C
    J Gen Psychol; 2016; 143(3):185-214. PubMed ID: 27410053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving Diagnostic Efficiency with Frequency Double-Trees and Frequency Nets in Bayesian Reasoning.
    Kunzelmann AK; Binder K; Fischer MR; Reincke M; Braun LT; Schmidmaier R
    MDM Policy Pract; 2022; 7(1):23814683221086623. PubMed ID: 35321028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are we good at detecting conflict during reasoning?
    Pennycook G; Fugelsang JA; Koehler DJ
    Cognition; 2012 Jul; 124(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 22575046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Good fences make for good neighbors but bad science: a review of what improves Bayesian reasoning and why.
    Brase GL; Hill WT
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():340. PubMed ID: 25873904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children's quantitative Bayesian inferences from natural frequencies and number of chances.
    Pighin S; Girotto V; Tentori K
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():164-175. PubMed ID: 28692831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.