These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38310006)

  • 1. Effect of low back pain on the kinetics and kinematics of the lumbar spine - a combined in vivo and in silico investigation.
    Firouzabadi A; Arjmand N; Zhang T; Pumberger M; Schmidt H
    J Biomech; 2024 Feb; 164():111954. PubMed ID: 38310006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons of lumbar spine loads and kinematics in healthy and non-specific low back pain individuals during unstable lifting activities.
    Heidari E; Arjmand N; Kahrizi S
    J Biomech; 2022 Nov; 144():111344. PubMed ID: 36270086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subject-specific regression equations to estimate lower spinal loads during symmetric and asymmetric static lifting.
    Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; El Ouaaid Z; Plamondon A; Arjmand N
    J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109550. PubMed ID: 31932024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trunk muscle activity during holding two types of dynamic loads in subjects with nonspecific low back pain.
    Ershad N; Kahrizi S; Parnianpour M; Azghani MR; Khalaf K
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2022 Jul; 31():7-15. PubMed ID: 35710224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of load expectations on neuromuscular and postural strategies during a freestyle lifting task in individuals with and without chronic low back pain.
    Daneau C; Tétreau C; Deroche T; Mainville C; Cantin V; Descarreaux M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246791. PubMed ID: 33556146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robust estimation of lumbar joint forces in symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks via large-scale electromyography-driven musculoskeletal models.
    Moya-Esteban A; van der Kooij H; Sartori M
    J Biomech; 2022 Nov; 144():111307. PubMed ID: 36191432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional impairment as a predictor of spine loading.
    Marras WS; Ferguson SA; Burr D; Davis KG; Gupta P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(7):729-37. PubMed ID: 15803073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating lumbar spine loading when using back-support exoskeletons in lifting tasks.
    Madinei S; Nussbaum MA
    J Biomech; 2023 Jan; 147():111439. PubMed ID: 36638578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One versus two-handed lifting and lowering: lumbar spine loads and recommended one-handed limits protecting the lower back.
    Weston EB; Aurand AM; Dufour JS; Knapik GG; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2020 Apr; 63(4):505-521. PubMed ID: 32024437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex-Dependent Estimation of Spinal Loads During Static Manual Material Handling Activities-Combined
    Firouzabadi A; Arjmand N; Pan F; Zander T; Schmidt H
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():750862. PubMed ID: 34796167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A braced arm-to-thigh (BATT) lifting technique reduces lumbar spine loads in healthy and low back pain participants.
    Beaucage-Gauvreau E; Brandon SCE; Robertson WSP; Fraser R; Freeman BJC; Graham RB; Thewlis D; Jones CF
    J Biomech; 2020 Feb; 100():109584. PubMed ID: 31898975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of obesity on spinal loads during load-reaching activities: A subject- and kinematics-specific musculoskeletal modeling approach.
    Bahramian M; Arjmand N; El-Rich M; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2023 Dec; 161():111770. PubMed ID: 37633816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical Assessment of the NIOSH Lifting Equation in Asymmetric Load-Handling Activities Using a Detailed Musculoskeletal Model.
    Behjati M; Arjmand N
    Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 30222936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From Stoop to Squat: A Comprehensive Analysis of Lumbar Loading Among Different Lifting Styles.
    von Arx M; Liechti M; Connolly L; Bangerter C; Meier ML; Schmid S
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():769117. PubMed ID: 34805121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Kinematics and Spondylosis of the Lumbar Spine Vary Depending on the Levels of Motion Segments in Individuals With Low Back Pain.
    Basques BA; Espinoza Orías AA; Shifflett GD; Fice MP; Andersson GB; An HS; Inoue N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Jul; 42(13):E767-E774. PubMed ID: 27831966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Difference of the thickness and activation of trunk muscles during static stoop lift at different loads between subjects with and without low back pain.
    Yang HS
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2018; 31(3):481-488. PubMed ID: 29332031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regression models for predicting peak and continuous three-dimensional spinal loads during symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks.
    Fathallah FA; Marras WS; Parnianpour M
    Hum Factors; 1999 Sep; 41(3):373-88. PubMed ID: 10665206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spine loading in patients with low back pain during asymmetric lifting exertions.
    Marras WS; Ferguson SA; Burr D; Davis KG; Gupta P
    Spine J; 2004; 4(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 14749195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Spine Kinematics, Kinetics, and Trunk Muscle Activities During Fatigue-Induced Repetitive Lifting.
    Kazemi Z; Mazloumi A; Arjmand N; Keihani A; Karimi Z; Ghasemi MS; Kordi R
    Hum Factors; 2022 Sep; 64(6):997-1012. PubMed ID: 33497290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.