116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38310381)
1. [An analysis of breast cancer patients with ultrasound BI-RADS 3 lesions after minimally invasive excision in clinicopathological features and influencing factors of residual tumor].
Li L; Feng ZQ; Zhang LF; Wang RQ; Zhang XX; Liu LY; Yu LX; Yu ZG; Gao ZC
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 62(2):135-140. PubMed ID: 38310381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of Invasive Breast Cancer in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
Shin YJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Jang M; Kim B; Lee SH
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Feb; 38(2):481-488. PubMed ID: 30069893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sonographic Features of Primary Breast Lymphoma: An Analysis of 10 Cases.
Liu X; Liu J; Chen S
Curr Med Imaging; 2023; 19(6):579-586. PubMed ID: 35975864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical impact of BI-RADS classification in Taiwanese breast cancer patients: BI-RADS 5 versus BI-RADS 0-4.
Kuo YL; Cheng L; Chang TW
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1504-7. PubMed ID: 21477958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can Short-term Follow-up with Ultrasound be Offered as an Acceptable Alternative to Immediate Biopsy or Surgery for Patients with First Ultrasound Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4A Lesions?
He P; Chen W; Cui LG; Zhang H
World J Surg; 2023 Sep; 47(9):2161-2168. PubMed ID: 37115232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The value of ultrasound classification in BI-RADS category 4 of breast complex cystic masses].
Yao JP; Niu LJ; Wang Y; Geng CY; Chang Q; Chen Y; Zhu L
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 40(9):672-675. PubMed ID: 30293391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound strain elastography for differentiation of malignant breast lesions.
Georgieva M; Prantl L; Utpatel K; Wiesinger I; Stroszczynski C; Jung F; Jung EM
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 71(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 30584133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of ultrasound, cytological, and histological features of 110 benign BI-RADS categories 4C and 5 nonpalpable breast lesions. The Institut Curie's experience.
Farras Roca JA; Tardivon A; Thibault F; Rouzier R; Klijanienko J
Cancer Cytopathol; 2021 Jun; 129(6):479-488. PubMed ID: 33689204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An audit of the results of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of mammography versus ultrasound screen-detected breast lesions.
Rhee SJ; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Ko EY
J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jun; 45(5):261-266. PubMed ID: 28182285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of BI-RADS-US 4a lesions less than 2 cm in diameter.
Yu MQ; Zhang LL; Jiang LP; Zhou AY
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2023; 83(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 35599475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic importance of ultrasound BI-RADS classification in breast cancer patients.
Kim JY; Jung EJ; Park T; Jeong SH; Jeong CY; Ju YT; Lee YJ; Hong SC; Ha WS; Choi SK
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 May; 45(5):411-5. PubMed ID: 25670765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging:Outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors.
Yao MM; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Lee CS
Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1048-1052. PubMed ID: 30195413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally Invasive Excision of Breast Masses under Ultrasound Guidance: A Single Center's Five-Year Experience on the Breast Lesion Excision System.
Karakas HM; Yildirim G
Breast J; 2022; 2022():1888726. PubMed ID: 35711894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided 8-Gauge Vacuum-assisted Excision System for the Removal of US-detectable Breast Lesions.
Perretta T; Lamacchia F; Ferrari D; Beninati E; DI Tosto F; DE Stasio V; Meucci R; DI Stefano C; Buonomo OC; Vanni G; Pistolese CA
Anticancer Res; 2020 Mar; 40(3):1719-1729. PubMed ID: 32132080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Strain Elastography on BI-RADS classification in small invasive lobular carcinoma.
Chiorean AR; Szep MB; Feier DS; Duma M; Chiorean MA; Strilciuc Ș
Med Ultrason; 2018 May; 20(2):148-153. PubMed ID: 29730679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon Descriptors and Stromal Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Candelaria RP; Spak DA; Rauch GM; Huo L; Bassett RL; Santiago L; Scoggins ME; Guirguis MS; Patel MM; Whitman GJ; Moulder SL; Thompson AM; Ravenberg EE; White JB; Abuhadra NK; Valero V; Litton J; Adrada BE; Yang WT
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S35-S41. PubMed ID: 34272161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound-guided wire localization biopsy in non-palpable breast lesions: predictive factors for malignancy.
Yilmaz S; Ünal GK; Aslan HS; Değirmencioğlu S; Aykota MR
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Feb; 26(4):1320-1327. PubMed ID: 35253188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of Return to Routine Screening for BI-RADS 3 Lesions Detected at Supplemental Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: A Prospective Study.
Barr RG; DeSivestri A; Golatta M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 34259039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China.
Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Wang H; Luo BM; Guo SL; Zhou Q; Xue ES; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Wang HQ; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S26-S34. PubMed ID: 32768352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast lesions excised via vacuum-assisted system: could we get any clues for B3 lesions before excision biopsy?
Zheng L; Zheng F; Xing Z; Zhang Y; Li Y; Xu H; Lai Y; Li J; Wang W
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):633. PubMed ID: 34049527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
