These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38310607)

  • 1. Perception of noise from unmanned aircraft systems: Efficacy of metrics for indoor and outdoor listener positions.
    Green N; Torija AJ; Ramos-Romero C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Feb; 155(2):915-929. PubMed ID: 38310607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influences of low-frequency energy and testing environment on annoyance responses to supersonic aircraft noise when heard indoors.
    Carr D; Davies P; Loubeau A; Rathsam J; Klos J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jul; 148(1):414. PubMed ID: 32752738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of acoustical and non-acoustical factors on short-term annoyance due to aircraft noise in the field - The COSMA study.
    Bartels S; Márki F; Müller U
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 538():834-43. PubMed ID: 26342903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Drone Noise Emission Characteristics and Noise Effects on Humans-A Systematic Review.
    Schäffer B; Pieren R; Heutschi K; Wunderli JM; Becker S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jun; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 34205949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of Metrics for Assessing Human Response to Drone Noise.
    Torija AJ; Nicholls RK
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(6):. PubMed ID: 35328839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving future low-noise aircraft technologies using experimental perception-based evaluation of synthetic flyovers.
    Pieren R; Bertsch L; Lauper D; Schäffer B
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 692():68-81. PubMed ID: 31336303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Field and laboratory studies of moving and temporally variable noise sources (aircraft); perception of location, movement, and direction.
    Gunn WJ; Shigehisa T; Shepherd WT
    J Aud Res; 1979 Oct; 19(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 262465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Annoyance responses to stable and changing aircraft noise exposure.
    Brink M; Wirth KE; Schierz C; Thomann G; Bauer G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):2930-41. PubMed ID: 19045781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comments on "Influences of low-frequency energy and testing environment on annoyance responses to supersonic aircraft noise when heard indoors" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 148(1), 414-429 (2020)].
    Vos J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Aug; 150(2):801. PubMed ID: 34470312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Annoyance caused by simultaneous impulse, road-traffic, and aircraft sounds: a quantitative model.
    Vos J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3330-45. PubMed ID: 1619113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the potential limitations of conventional sound metrics in quantifying perception of nonlinearly propagated noise.
    Gee KL; Swift SH; Sparrow VW; Plotkin KJ; Downing JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):EL1-7. PubMed ID: 17297819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation of the relationship between aircraft noise and community annoyance in China.
    Guoqing D; Xiaoyi L; Xiang S; Zhengguang L; Qili L
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(57):52-7. PubMed ID: 22517304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of loudness-level weightings for assessing the annoyance of environmental noise.
    Schomer PD; Suzuki Y; Saito F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2390-7. PubMed ID: 11757929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Annoyance response to recorded aircraft noise. I. Effect of intensity of illumination.
    Shigehisa T; Gunn WJ
    J Aud Res; 1978 Jul; 18(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 755813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aircraft Noise and Psychological Ill-Health: The Results of a Cross-Sectional Study in France.
    Baudin C; Lefèvre M; Champelovier P; Lambert J; Laumon B; Evrard AS
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Aug; 15(8):. PubMed ID: 30081458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of changed aircraft noise exposure on experiential qualities of outdoor recreational areas.
    Krog NH; Engdahl B; Tambs K
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2010 Oct; 7(10):3739-59. PubMed ID: 21139858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Annoyance with aircraft noise in local recreational areas and the recreationists' noise situation at home.
    Krog NH; Engdahl B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jan; 117(1):221-31. PubMed ID: 15704415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Summary of recent NASA studies of human response to sonic booms.
    Leatherwood JD; Sullivan BM; Shepherd KP; McCurdy DA; Brown SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 2):586-98. PubMed ID: 11837964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Requirements for Drone Operations to Minimise Community Noise Impact.
    Ramos-Romero C; Green N; Roberts S; Clark C; Torija AJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 35954654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Community reaction to aircraft noise: time-of-day penalty and tradeoff between levels of overflights.
    Miedema HM; Vos H; de Jong RG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3245-53. PubMed ID: 10875369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.