These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38310835)

  • 1. Safety-oriented automated vehicle longitudinal control considering both stability and damping behavior.
    Dai Y; Wang C; Xie Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Apr; 198():107486. PubMed ID: 38310835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longitudinal safety impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control vehicle's degradation.
    Tu Y; Wang W; Li Y; Xu C; Xu T; Li X
    J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():177-192. PubMed ID: 31235228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advancing investigation of automated vehicle crashes using text analytics of crash narratives and Bayesian analysis.
    Lee S; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 181():106932. PubMed ID: 36580765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal traffic conflict analysis of autonomous and traditional vehicle platoons in field tests via surrogate safety measures.
    Das T; Shoaib Samandar M; Rouphail N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Nov; 177():106822. PubMed ID: 36103759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Velocity control in car-following behavior with autonomous vehicles using reinforcement learning.
    Wang Z; Huang H; Tang J; Meng X; Hu L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106729. PubMed ID: 35700685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stability and safety evaluation of mixed traffic flow with connected automated vehicles on expressways.
    Yao Z; Hu R; Jiang Y; Xu T
    J Safety Res; 2020 Dec; 75():262-274. PubMed ID: 33334485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Explicitly incorporating surrogate safety measures into connected and automated vehicle longitudinal control objectives for enhancing platoon safety.
    Dai Y; Wang C; Xie Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Apr; 183():106975. PubMed ID: 36696746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterizing car-following behaviors of human drivers when following automated vehicles using the real-world dataset.
    Wen X; Cui Z; Jian S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jul; 172():106689. PubMed ID: 35569279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing the risk of rear-end collisions with infrastructure-to-vehicle (I2V) integration of variable speed limit control and adaptive cruise control system.
    Li Y; Wang H; Wang W; Liu S; Xiang Y
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Aug; 17(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 26761633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of assignments of dedicated automated vehicle lanes and inter-vehicle distances of automated vehicle platoons on car-following performance of nearby manual vehicle drivers.
    Chen F; Lu G; Tan H; Liu M; Wan H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Nov; 177():106826. PubMed ID: 36081223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What can we learn from autonomous vehicle collision data on crash severity? A cost-sensitive CART approach.
    Zhu S; Meng Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106769. PubMed ID: 35858521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the safety impact of adaptive cruise control in traffic oscillations on freeways.
    Li Y; Li Z; Wang H; Wang W; Xing L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():137-145. PubMed ID: 28500990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integration of automated vehicles in mixed traffic: Evaluating changes in performance of following human-driven vehicles.
    Mahdinia I; Mohammadnazar A; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():106006. PubMed ID: 33556655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety performance evaluation of freeway merging areas under autonomous vehicles environment using a co-simulation platform.
    Chen P; Ni H; Wang L; Yu G; Sun J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 May; 199():107530. PubMed ID: 38437756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human-like car-following model for autonomous vehicles considering the cut-in behavior of other vehicles in mixed traffic.
    Fu R; Li Z; Sun Q; Wang C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105260. PubMed ID: 31442924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of pre-crash scenarios and contributing factors for autonomous vehicle crashes at intersections.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Liu S; Yu C; Glaser Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107383. PubMed ID: 37984113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantifying the automated vehicle safety performance: A scoping review of the literature, evaluation of methods, and directions for future research.
    Sohrabi S; Khodadadi A; Mousavi SM; Dadashova B; Lord D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():106003. PubMed ID: 33571922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Wu X; Glaser Y; He L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106281. PubMed ID: 34273622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated vehicle crash sequences: Patterns and potential uses in safety testing.
    Song Y; Chitturi MV; Noyce DA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Apr; 153():106017. PubMed ID: 33578268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Towards common ethical and safe 'behaviour' standards for automated vehicles.
    Papadimitriou E; Farah H; van de Kaa G; Santoni de Sio F; Hagenzieker M; van Gelder P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106724. PubMed ID: 35691223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.