These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Sensitivity to orthographic vs. phonological constraints on word recognition: An ERP study with deaf and hearing readers. Lee B; Martinez PM; Midgley KJ; Holcomb PJ; Emmorey K Neuropsychologia; 2022 Dec; 177():108420. PubMed ID: 36396091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An ERP investigation of orthographic precision in deaf and hearing readers. Meade G; Grainger J; Midgley KJ; Holcomb PJ; Emmorey K Neuropsychologia; 2020 Sep; 146():107542. PubMed ID: 32590018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early use of phonological codes in deaf readers: An ERP study. Gutierrez-Sigut E; Vergara-Martínez M; Perea M Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():261-279. PubMed ID: 28987908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Orthographic and phonological processing in developing readers revealed by ERPs. Eddy MD; Grainger J; Holcomb PJ; Gabrieli JD Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1776-1783. PubMed ID: 27671210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Grainger J; Kiyonaga K; Holcomb PJ Psychol Sci; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1021-6. PubMed ID: 17201781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ERP effects of masked orthographic neighbour priming in deaf readers. Meade G; Grainger J; Midgley KJ; Holcomb PJ; Emmorey K Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2019; 34(8):1016-1026. PubMed ID: 31595216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The time course of Cantonese and Hong Kong Sign Language phonological activation: An ERP study of deaf bimodal bilingual readers of Chinese. Thierfelder P Cognition; 2024 Jul; 251():105878. PubMed ID: 39024841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Orthographic, Phonological, and Semantic Dynamics During Visual Word Recognition in Deaf Versus Hearing Adults. Peleg O; Ben-Hur G; Segal O J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2334-2344. PubMed ID: 32603647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of visual cues during visual word recognition in deaf readers: An ERP study. Gutierrez-Sigut E; Vergara-Martínez M; Perea M Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104938. PubMed ID: 34678681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing. Gutierrez-Sigut E; Vergara-Martínez M; Perea M Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):12321. PubMed ID: 31444497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence for Separate Contributions of High and Low Spatial Frequencies during Visual Word Recognition. Winsler K; Holcomb PJ; Midgley KJ; Grainger J Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():324. PubMed ID: 28690505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quick, automatic, and general activation of orthographic and phonological representations in young readers. Booth JR; Perfetti CA; MacWhinney B Dev Psychol; 1999 Jan; 35(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 9923460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrophysiological patterns of visual word recognition in deaf and hearing readers: An ERP mega-study. Winsler K; Holcomb PJ; Emmorey K Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2023; 38(5):636-650. PubMed ID: 37304206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phonological and orthographic coding in deaf skilled readers. Fariña N; Duñabeitia JA; Carreiras M Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():27-33. PubMed ID: 28646750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]