175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38313030)
1. How reliable is metabarcoding for pollen identification? An evaluation of different taxonomic assignment strategies by cross-validation.
San Martin G; Hautier L; Mingeot D; Dubois B
PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16567. PubMed ID: 38313030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A detailed workflow to develop QIIME2-formatted reference databases for taxonomic analysis of DNA metabarcoding data.
Dubois B; Debode F; Hautier L; Hulin J; Martin GS; Delvaux A; Janssen E; Mingeot D
BMC Genom Data; 2022 Jul; 23(1):53. PubMed ID: 35804326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Taxonomic Characterization of Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Pollen Foraging Based on Non-Overlapping Paired-End Sequencing of Nuclear Ribosomal Loci.
Cornman RS; Otto CR; Iwanowicz D; Pettis JS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145365. PubMed ID: 26700168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomonitoring via DNA metabarcoding and light microscopy of bee pollen in rainforest transformation landscapes of Sumatra.
Carneiro de Melo Moura C; Setyaningsih CA; Li K; Merk MS; Schulze S; Raffiudin R; Grass I; Behling H; Tscharntke T; Westphal C; Gailing O
BMC Ecol Evol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):51. PubMed ID: 35473550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using DNA Metabarcoding to Identify the Floral Composition of Honey: A New Tool for Investigating Honey Bee Foraging Preferences.
Hawkins J; de Vere N; Griffith A; Ford CR; Allainguillaume J; Hegarty MJ; Baillie L; Adams-Groom B
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134735. PubMed ID: 26308362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Capabilities and limitations of using DNA metabarcoding to study plant-pollinator interactions.
Arstingstall KA; DeBano SJ; Li X; Wooster DE; Rowland MM; Burrows S; Frost K
Mol Ecol; 2021 Oct; 30(20):5266-5297. PubMed ID: 34390062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Be positive: customized reference databases and new, local barcodes balance false taxonomic assignments in metabarcoding studies.
Mugnai F; Costantini F; Chenuil A; Leduc M; Gutiérrez Ortega JM; Meglécz E
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14616. PubMed ID: 36643652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating the use of pollen DNA metabarcoding to quantify bee foraging and effects of threshold selection.
Arstingstall KA; DeBano SJ; Li X; Wooster DE; Rowland MM; Burrows S; Frost K
PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0282715. PubMed ID: 37071613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing modern identification methods for wild bees: Metabarcoding and image-based morphological taxonomic assignment.
Smith CD; Cornman RS; Fike JA; Kraus JM; Oyler-McCance SJ; Givens CE; Hladik ML; Vandever MW; Kolpin DW; Smalling KL
PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0301474. PubMed ID: 38564614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of current taxonomic assignment strategies for metabarcoding eukaryotes.
Hleap JS; Littlefair JE; Steinke D; Hebert PDN; Cristescu ME
Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Oct; 21(7):2190-2203. PubMed ID: 33905615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating multiplexed next-generation sequencing as a method in palynology for mixed pollen samples.
Keller A; Danner N; Grimmer G; Ankenbrand M; von der Ohe K; von der Ohe W; Rost S; Härtel S; Steffan-Dewenter I
Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2015 Mar; 17(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 25270225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Floral hosts of leaf-cutter bees (Megachilidae) in a biodiversity hotspot revealed by pollen DNA metabarcoding of historic specimens.
Gous A; Eardley CD; Johnson SD; Swanevelder DZH; Willows-Munro S
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244973. PubMed ID: 33476342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing whole-genome shotgun sequencing and DNA metabarcoding approaches for species identification and quantification of pollen species mixtures.
Bell KL; Petit RA; Cutler A; Dobbs EK; Macpherson JM; Read TD; Burgess KS; Brosi BJ
Ecol Evol; 2021 Nov; 11(22):16082-16098. PubMed ID: 34824813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of pollen DNA metabarcoding using constructed species mixtures.
Bell KL; Burgess KS; Botsch JC; Dobbs EK; Read TD; Brosi BJ
Mol Ecol; 2019 Jan; 28(2):431-455. PubMed ID: 30118180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outlier detection in BLAST hits.
Shah N; Altschul SF; Pop M
Algorithms Mol Biol; 2018; 13():7. PubMed ID: 29588650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An
Bell KL; Loeffler VM; Brosi BJ
Appl Plant Sci; 2017 Mar; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 28337390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving metabarcoding taxonomic assignment: A case study of fishes in a large marine ecosystem.
Gold Z; Curd EE; Goodwin KD; Choi ES; Frable BW; Thompson AR; Walker HJ; Burton RS; Kacev D; Martz LD; Barber PH
Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Oct; 21(7):2546-2564. PubMed ID: 34235858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Large-Scale Monitoring of Plants through Environmental DNA Metabarcoding of Soil: Recovery, Resolution, and Annotation of Four DNA Markers.
Fahner NA; Shokralla S; Baird DJ; Hajibabaei M
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157505. PubMed ID: 27310720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification of species in the angiosperm family Apiaceae using DNA barcodes.
Liu J; Shi L; Han J; Li G; Lu H; Hou J; Zhou X; Meng F; Downie SR
Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Nov; 14(6):1231-8. PubMed ID: 24739357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New universal ITS2 primers for high-resolution herbivory analyses using DNA metabarcoding in both tropical and temperate zones.
Moorhouse-Gann RJ; Dunn JC; de Vere N; Goder M; Cole N; Hipperson H; Symondson WOC
Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):8542. PubMed ID: 29867115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
