BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38313217)

  • 1. The influence of sex-division, experience, and pacing strategy on performance in the 2020 CrossFit® Open.
    Mangine GT; Zeitz EK; Dexheimer JD; Hines A; Lively B; Kliszczewicz BM
    Front Sports Act Living; 2024; 6():1344036. PubMed ID: 38313217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pacing Strategies Differ by Sex and Rank in 2020 CrossFit
    Mangine GT; Zeitz EK; Dexheimer JD; Hines A; Lively B; Kliszczewicz BM
    Sports (Basel); 2023 Oct; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 37888526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential improvements between men and women in repeated CrossFit open workouts.
    Mangine GT; Grundlingh N; Feito Y
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0283910. PubMed ID: 38015875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Workout Pacing Predictors of Crossfit
    Mangine GT; Feito Y; Tankersley JE; McDougle JM; Kliszczewicz BM
    J Hum Kinet; 2021 Mar; 78():89-100. PubMed ID: 34025867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normative Scores for CrossFit
    Mangine GT; Grundlingh N; Feito Y
    Sports (Basel); 2023 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 36828309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CrossFit® open performance is affected by the nature of past competition experiences.
    Mangine GT; McDougle JM
    BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2022 Mar; 14(1):46. PubMed ID: 35331301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying CrossFit
    Mangine GT; Seay TR
    Front Sports Act Living; 2022; 4():949429. PubMed ID: 36311217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Body Composition in CrossFit
    Menargues-Ramírez R; Sospedra I; Holway F; Hurtado-Sánchez JA; Martínez-Sanz JM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(17):. PubMed ID: 36078716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship of aerobic capacity, anaerobic peak power and experience to performance in CrossFit exercise.
    Bellar D; Hatchett A; Judge LW; Breaux ME; Marcus L
    Biol Sport; 2015 Nov; 32(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 26681834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physical and Physiological Predictors of FRAN CrossFit
    Leitão L; Dias M; Campos Y; Vieira JG; Sant'Ana L; Telles LG; Tavares C; Mazini M; Novaes J; Vianna J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(8):. PubMed ID: 33921538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises.
    Dos Santos WM; Junior ACT; Braz TV; Lopes CR; Brigatto FA; Dos Santos JW
    J Strength Cond Res; 2022 Jun; 36(6):1506-1510. PubMed ID: 31904718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acute Caffeine Supplementation Does Not Improve Performance in Trained CrossFit
    Stein JA; Ramirez M; Heinrich KM
    Sports (Basel); 2020 Apr; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 32340121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictors of CrossFit Open Performance.
    Mangine GT; Tankersley JE; McDougle JM; Velazquez N; Roberts MD; Esmat TA; VanDusseldorp TA; Feito Y
    Sports (Basel); 2020 Jul; 8(7):. PubMed ID: 32698335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Relationship between CrossFit
    Zeitz EK; Cook LF; Dexheimer JD; Lemez S; Leyva WD; Terbio IY; Tran JR; Jo E
    Sports (Basel); 2020 Aug; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 32796573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of a CrossFit
    Meier N; Rabel S; Schmidt A
    Sports (Basel); 2021 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 34199523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do physiological measures predict selected CrossFit(®) benchmark performance?
    Butcher SJ; Neyedly TJ; Horvey KJ; Benko CR
    Open Access J Sports Med; 2015; 6():241-7. PubMed ID: 26261428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting the Unknown and the Unknowable. Are Anthropometric Measures and Fitness Profile Associated with the Outcome of a Simulated CrossFit
    Peña J; Moreno-Doutres D; Peña I; Chulvi-Medrano I; Ortegón A; Aguilera-Castells J; Buscà B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 33916215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repeated anaerobic tests predict performance among a group of advanced CrossFit-trained athletes.
    Feito Y; Giardina MJ; Butcher S; Mangine GT
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2019 Jul; 44(7):727-735. PubMed ID: 30500263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concentric-Only Versus Touch-and-Go Bench Press One-Repetition Maximum in Men and Women.
    García-Ramos A; Janicijevic D; Jukic I
    Sports Health; 2021; 13(4):373-379. PubMed ID: 33541232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.