These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38314342)

  • 21. Human examination and artificial intelligence in cephalometric landmark detection-is AI ready to take over?
    Indermun S; Shaik S; Nyirenda C; Johannes K; Mulder R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Sep; 52(6):20220362. PubMed ID: 37427581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Personal Computer-Based Cephalometric Landmark Detection With Deep Learning, Using Cephalograms on the Internet.
    Nishimoto S; Sotsuka Y; Kawai K; Ishise H; Kakibuchi M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 30(1):91-95. PubMed ID: 30439733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of automatic cephalometric landmark identification using artificial intelligence.
    Bulatova G; Kusnoto B; Grace V; Tsay TP; Avenetti DM; Sanchez FJC
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Dec; 24 Suppl 2():37-42. PubMed ID: 34842346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of OneCeph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis-a cross-sectional study.
    Mohan A; Sivakumar A; Nalabothu P
    BDJ Open; 2021 Jun; 7(1):22. PubMed ID: 34140466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Artificial intelligence system for automated landmark localization and analysis of cephalometry.
    Jiang F; Guo Y; Yang C; Zhou Y; Lin Y; Cheng F; Quan S; Feng Q; Li J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Jan; 52(1):20220081. PubMed ID: 36279185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of Soft Tissue Landmark Reliability between Manual and Computerized Plotting Methods.
    Kasinathan G; Kommi PB; Kumar SM; Yashwant A; Arani N; Sabapathy S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Apr; 18(4):317-321. PubMed ID: 28349911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of landmark detection in cephalometric radiographs with different conditions of brightness and contrast using the an artificial intelligence software.
    Menezes LDS; Silva TP; Lima Dos Santos MA; Hughes MM; Mariano Souza SDR; Leite Ribeiro PM; Freitas PHL; Takeshita WM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230065. PubMed ID: 37869886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of accuracy and reproducibility of cephalometric identification performed by 2 artificial intelligence-driven tracing applications and human examiners.
    Silva TP; Pinheiro MCR; Freitas DQ; Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 Apr; 137(4):431-440. PubMed ID: 38365543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of AudaxCeph®'s fully automated cephalometric tracing technology to a semi-automated approach by human examiners.
    Ristau B; Coreil M; Chapple A; Armbruster P; Ballard R
    Int Orthod; 2022 Dec; 20(4):100691. PubMed ID: 36114136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Web-based fully automated cephalometric analysis by deep learning.
    Kim H; Shim E; Park J; Kim YJ; Lee U; Kim Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 194():105513. PubMed ID: 32403052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Skeletal facial asymmetry: reliability of manual and artificial intelligence-driven analysis.
    Kazimierczak N; Kazimierczak W; Serafin Z; Nowicki P; Jankowski T; Jankowska A; Janiszewska-Olszowska J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2024 Jan; 53(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 38214946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The reliability and reproducibility of an Android cephalometric smartphone application in comparison with the conventional method.
    Zamrik OM; İşeri H
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Mar; 91(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 33367490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Correlation Analysis of Nasal Septum Deviation and Results of AI-Driven Automated 3D Cephalometric Analysis.
    Kazimierczak N; Kazimierczak W; Serafin Z; Nowicki P; Lemanowicz A; Nadolska K; Janiszewska-Olszowska J
    J Clin Med; 2023 Oct; 12(20):. PubMed ID: 37892759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software.
    Kim HJ; Kim KD; Kim DH
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11659. PubMed ID: 35804075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Efficacy of smartphone-based Mobile learning versus lecture-based learning for instruction of Cephalometric landmark identification.
    Golshah A; Dehdar F; Imani MM; Nikkerdar N
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Aug; 20(1):287. PubMed ID: 32867758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Commercial artificial intelligence lateral cephalometric analysis: part 1-the possibility of replacing manual landmarking with artificial intelligence service.
    Lee J; Bae SR; Noh HK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Nov; 47(6):106-118. PubMed ID: 37997242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of a Convolutional Neural Network- Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Detection.
    Uğurlu M
    Turk J Orthod; 2022 Jun; 35(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 35788433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical applicability of automated cephalometric landmark identification: Part I-Patient-related identification errors.
    Tanikawa C; Lee C; Lim J; Oka A; Yamashiro T
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Dec; 24 Suppl 2():43-52. PubMed ID: 34021976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Cephalometric Landmarks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    de Queiroz Tavares Borges Mesquita G; Vieira WA; Vidigal MTC; Travençolo BAN; Beaini TL; Spin-Neto R; Paranhos LR; de Brito Júnior RB
    J Digit Imaging; 2023 Jun; 36(3):1158-1179. PubMed ID: 36604364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Artificial intelligence-based cephalometric landmark annotation and measurements according to Arnett's analysis: can we trust a bot to do that?
    Silva TP; Hughes MM; Menezes LDS; de Melo MFB; Freitas PHL; Takeshita WM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Sep; 51(6):20200548. PubMed ID: 33882247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.