These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
47. Scene-of-crime analysis by a 3-dimensional optical digitizer: a useful perspective for forensic science. Sansoni G; Cattaneo C; Trebeschi M; Gibelli D; Poppa P; Porta D; Maldarella M; Picozzi M Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2011 Sep; 32(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 21811148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Mapping homicide by 3-D modelling of bloodstain patterns at crime scene. Kislov MA; Chauhan M; Khanna SK; Leonov SV; Leonova EN; Nagornov MN; Berezovsky BD; Lomakin YV; Bychkov AA; Stepanov SA; Krupin KN; Sergeevna ZM Med Leg J; 2023 Jun; 91(2):109-112. PubMed ID: 36695005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Smartphone LiDAR Data: A Case Study for Numerisation of Indoor Buildings in Railway Stations. Catharia O; Richard F; Vignoles H; Véron P; Aoussat A; Segonds F Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Advances in Technologies in Crime Scene Investigation. Esposito M; Sessa F; Cocimano G; Zuccarello P; Roccuzzo S; Salerno M Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Oct; 13(20):. PubMed ID: 37891990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Robust Serum Albumin-Responsive AIEgen Enables Latent Bloodstain Visualization in High Resolution and Reliability for Crime Scene Investigation. Wang Z; Zhang P; Liu H; Zhao Z; Xiong L; He W; Kwok RTK; Lam JWY; Ye R; Tang BZ ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2019 May; 11(19):17306-17312. PubMed ID: 31020832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Hierarchical, Three-Dimensional Measurement System for Crime Scene Scanning. Marcin A; Maciej S; Robert S; Adam W J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jul; 62(4):889-899. PubMed ID: 28150303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The Endockscope Using Next Generation Smartphones: "A Global Opportunity". Tse C; Patel RM; Yoon R; Okhunov Z; Landman J; Clayman RV J Endourol; 2018 Aug; 32(8):765-770. PubMed ID: 29860870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Age estimation of bloodstains using smartphones and digital image analysis. Thanakiatkrai P; Yaodam A; Kitpipit T Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Dec; 233(1-3):288-97. PubMed ID: 24314532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Testing photogrammetry-based techniques for three-dimensional surface documentation in forensic pathology. Urbanová P; Hejna P; Jurda M Forensic Sci Int; 2015 May; 250():77-86. PubMed ID: 25818581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Accuracy and reproducibility of conclusions by forensic bloodstain pattern analysts. Hicklin RA; Winer KR; Kish PE; Parks CL; Chapman W; Dunagan K; Richetelli N; Epstein EG; Ausdemore MA; Busey TA Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Aug; 325():110856. PubMed ID: 34116402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of yarn structure on wicking and its impact on bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA) on woven cotton fabrics. Li X; Li J; Michielsen S Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jul; 276():41-50. PubMed ID: 28499150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Surface curvature of pelvic joints from three laser scanners: separating anatomy from measurement error. Villa C; Gaudio D; Cattaneo C; Buckberry J; Wilson AS; Lynnerup N J Forensic Sci; 2015 Mar; 60(2):374-81. PubMed ID: 25684259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Geomatic techniques in forensic science: A review. Berezowski V; Mallett X; Moffat I Sci Justice; 2020 Mar; 60(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 32111294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]