BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38316238)

  • 1. Impact of accumulating risk factors on the incidence of dislocation after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using a medial glenoid-lateral humerus onlay prosthesis.
    Parsons M; Elwell J; Muh S; Wright T; Flurin P; Zuckerman J; Roche C
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38316238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of accumulating risk factors on the acromial and scapular fracture rate after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with a medialized glenoid-lateralized humerus onlay prosthesis.
    Roche CP; Fan W; Simovitch R; Wright T; Flurin PH; Zuckerman JD; Routman H
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jul; 32(7):1465-1475. PubMed ID: 36731625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aseptic glenoid baseplate loosening after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with a single prosthesis.
    Schell LE; Roche CP; Eichinger JK; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Zuckerman JD; Friedman RJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Aug; 32(8):1584-1593. PubMed ID: 36736657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Superior Baseplate Inclination Is Associated With Instability After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
    Tashjian RZ; Martin BI; Ricketts CA; Henninger HB; Granger EK; Chalmers PN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 476(8):1622-1629. PubMed ID: 29781910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Clinical Performance of Inlay versus Onlay Humerus Implants in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
    Lee HJ; Yoon CY; Kim YS
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2023 Feb; 15(1):135-144. PubMed ID: 36778983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of humeral stem and glenosphere designs on range of motion and muscle length in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
    Lädermann A; Denard PJ; Collin P; Zbinden O; Chiu JC; Boileau P; Olivier F; Walch G
    Int Orthop; 2020 Mar; 44(3):519-530. PubMed ID: 31900574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A kinematic and electromyographic comparison of a Grammont-style reverse arthroplasty combined with a l'Episcopo transfer compared to a lateralized humeral component reverse for restoration of active external rotation.
    Merolla G; Cuoghi F; Athwal GS; Parel I; Filippi MV; Cutti AG; Fabbri E; Padolino A; Paladini P; Catani F; Porcellini G
    Int Orthop; 2021 Aug; 45(8):2061-2069. PubMed ID: 34212229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of humeral and glenoid component variations on range of motion in reverse geometry total shoulder arthroplasty: a standardized computer model study.
    Arenas-Miquelez A; Murphy RJ; Rosa A; Caironi D; Zumstein MA
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):763-771. PubMed ID: 32763384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Survivorship and Failure Modes Between Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Across Multiple Government Joint Registries for a Single Platform Shoulder System.
    Roche CP; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Zuckerman JD
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2023 Jun; 81(2):141-150. PubMed ID: 37200333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does glenohumeral offset affect clinical outcomes in a lateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?
    Wolf GJ; Reid JJ; Rabinowitz JR; Barcel DA; Barfield WR; Eichinger JK; Friedman RJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jan; 32(1):50-58. PubMed ID: 35872171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Relationship Between Design-Based Lateralization, Humeral bearing design, Polyethylene Angle, and Patient-Related Factors on Surgical Complications after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Machine Learning Analysis.
    Marigi EM; Oeding JF; Nieboer M; Marigi IM; Wahlig B; Barlow JD; Sanchez-Sotelo J; Sperling JW
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38852709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Software simulations of changing offsets and thus soft tissue tension when revising anatomic to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in convertible platform systems.
    Ferrando A; Natera L; Buch B; Consigliere P; Bruguera J; Sforza G; Atoun E; Levy O
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2021 May; 31(4):611-619. PubMed ID: 33090267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using contemporary medialized modular systems. Can we still consider it such a frequent complication?
    Garcia-Fernandez C; Lopiz Y; Arvinius C; Ponz V; Alcobía-Diaz B; Checa P; Galán-Olleros M; Marco F
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2022 Dec; 32(8):1525-1534. PubMed ID: 34591167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Augments for Glenoid Wear. Comparison of Posterior Augments to Superior Augments.
    Wright TW; Roche CP; Wright L; Flurin PH; Crosby LA; Zuckerman JD
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S124-8. PubMed ID: 26631208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Grammont humeral design versus onlay curved-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Merolla G; Walch G; Ascione F; Paladini P; Fabbri E; Padolino A; Porcellini G
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Apr; 27(4):701-710. PubMed ID: 29290604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of complication types and rates associated with anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Parada SA; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Zuckerman JD; Elwell JA; Roche CP; Friedman RJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):811-818. PubMed ID: 32763380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No difference in range of motion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using standard or constrained liners: a matched cohort study.
    Goodloe JB; Denard PJ; Lederman E; Gobezie R; Werner BC
    JSES Int; 2022 Nov; 6(6):929-934. PubMed ID: 36353430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk factors for complications and revision surgery after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Aibinder W; Schoch B; Parsons M; Watling J; Ko JK; Gobbato B; Throckmorton T; Routman H; Fan W; Simmons C; Roche C
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Nov; 30(11):e689-e701. PubMed ID: 33964427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and mini-humeral tray reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implant comparisons: two-year clinical outcomes.
    Krupp R; O'Grady C; Werner B; Wiater JM; Nyland J; Duquin T
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):1045-1056. PubMed ID: 37898968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: how did medialized and glenoid-based lateralized style prostheses compare at 10 years?
    Kennon JC; Songy C; Bartels D; Statz J; Cofield RH; Sperling JW; Sanchez-Sotelo J
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7S):S23-S31. PubMed ID: 32044250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.