These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38316722)

  • 21. View-invariant object category learning, recognition, and search: how spatial and object attention are coordinated using surface-based attentional shrouds.
    Fazl A; Grossberg S; Mingolla E
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Feb; 58(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 18653176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.
    Mayr U
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Mar; 22(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 8901340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: implications for theoretical accounts of spatial learning.
    Sturz BR; Brown MF; Kelly DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 19293099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Statistical regularities guide the spatial scale of attention.
    Zhao J; Luo Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 27844342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation.
    Failing M; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 30868474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Memory-driven capture occurs for individual features of an object.
    Sasin E; Fougnie D
    Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19499. PubMed ID: 33177574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts.
    De Goede M; Postma A
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 17950509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Binding objects to locations: the relationship between object files and visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Rasmussen IP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):543-64. PubMed ID: 20515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Space-, object-, and feature-based attention interact to organize visual scenes.
    Kravitz DJ; Behrmann M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2434-47. PubMed ID: 22006523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention.
    Gao Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3895-3906. PubMed ID: 32909086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An investigation of far and near transfer in a gamified visual learning paradigm.
    Duyck S; Op de Beeck H
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0227000. PubMed ID: 31877187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Object-based selection in the Baylis and Driver (1993) paradigm is subject to space-based attentional modulation.
    Müller HJ; O'Grady R; Krummenacher J; Heller D
    Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):609-29. PubMed ID: 18925416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Category-specific learned attentional bias to object parts.
    Chua KW; Gauthier I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 26715512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Learning in repeated visual search.
    Hout MC; Goldinger SD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1267-82. PubMed ID: 20601709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Statistical learning of spatiotemporal regularities dynamically guides visual attention across space.
    Xu Z; Theeuwes J; Los SA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1054-1072. PubMed ID: 36207663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Task specificity of attention training: the case of probability cuing.
    Jiang YV; Swallow KM; Won BY; Cistera JD; Rosenbaum GM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):50-66. PubMed ID: 25113853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modulations of saliency signals at two hierarchical levels of priority computation revealed by spatial statistical distractor learning.
    Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Apr; 150(4):710-728. PubMed ID: 33048567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Statistical regularities induce spatial as well as feature-specific suppression.
    Failing M; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Wang B; Olivers C; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1291-1303. PubMed ID: 31157536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Explicit attentional goals unlock implicit spatial statistical learning.
    Zhang Z; Carlisle NB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Aug; 152(8):2125-2137. PubMed ID: 37053400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Statistical learning is constrained to less abstract patterns in complex sensory input (but not the least).
    Emberson LL; Rubinstein DY
    Cognition; 2016 Aug; 153():63-78. PubMed ID: 27139779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.