These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38316722)
21. View-invariant object category learning, recognition, and search: how spatial and object attention are coordinated using surface-based attentional shrouds. Fazl A; Grossberg S; Mingolla E Cogn Psychol; 2009 Feb; 58(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 18653176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. Mayr U J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Mar; 22(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 8901340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: implications for theoretical accounts of spatial learning. Sturz BR; Brown MF; Kelly DM Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 19293099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Statistical regularities guide the spatial scale of attention. Zhao J; Luo Y Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 27844342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation. Failing M; Wang B; Theeuwes J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 30868474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Memory-driven capture occurs for individual features of an object. Sasin E; Fougnie D Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19499. PubMed ID: 33177574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts. De Goede M; Postma A Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 17950509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Binding objects to locations: the relationship between object files and visual working memory. Hollingworth A; Rasmussen IP J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):543-64. PubMed ID: 20515188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Space-, object-, and feature-based attention interact to organize visual scenes. Kravitz DJ; Behrmann M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2434-47. PubMed ID: 22006523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An investigation of far and near transfer in a gamified visual learning paradigm. Duyck S; Op de Beeck H PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0227000. PubMed ID: 31877187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Object-based selection in the Baylis and Driver (1993) paradigm is subject to space-based attentional modulation. Müller HJ; O'Grady R; Krummenacher J; Heller D Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):609-29. PubMed ID: 18925416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]