184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38316797)
1. DynamicBind: predicting ligand-specific protein-ligand complex structure with a deep equivariant generative model.
Lu W; Zhang J; Huang W; Zhang Z; Jia X; Wang Z; Shi L; Li C; Wolynes PG; Zheng S
Nat Commun; 2024 Feb; 15(1):1071. PubMed ID: 38316797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Free Energy Calculations Using the Movable Type Method with Molecular Dynamics Driven Protein-Ligand Sampling.
Liu W; Liu Z; Liu H; Westerhoff LM; Zheng Z
J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5645-5665. PubMed ID: 36282990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advancements in Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations Towards Ligand-receptor Interactions and Structure-function Relationships.
Naqvi AAT; Mohammad T; Hasan GM; Hassan MI
Curr Top Med Chem; 2018; 18(20):1755-1768. PubMed ID: 30360721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ensemble-based docking using biased molecular dynamics.
Campbell AJ; Lamb ML; Joseph-McCarthy D
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):2127-38. PubMed ID: 24881672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conformational transitions upon ligand binding: holo-structure prediction from apo conformations.
Seeliger D; de Groot BL
PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Jan; 6(1):e1000634. PubMed ID: 20066034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Equivariant Flexible Modeling of the Protein-Ligand Binding Pose with Geometric Deep Learning.
Dong T; Yang Z; Zhou J; Chen CY
J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Nov; 19(22):8446-8459. PubMed ID: 37938978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AutoPH4: An Automated Method for Generating Pharmacophore Models from Protein Binding Pockets.
Jiang S; Feher M; Williams C; Cole B; Shaw DE
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4326-4338. PubMed ID: 32639159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Holo-like and Druggable Protein Conformations from Enhanced Sampling of Binding Pocket Volume and Shape.
Basciu A; Malloci G; Pietrucci F; Bonvin AMJJ; Vargiu AV
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Apr; 59(4):1515-1528. PubMed ID: 30883122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. FINDSITE
Zhou H; Cao H; Skolnick J
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Nov; 58(11):2343-2354. PubMed ID: 30278128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ensemble Docking in Drug Discovery: How Many Protein Configurations from Molecular Dynamics Simulations are Needed To Reproduce Known Ligand Binding?
Evangelista Falcon W; Ellingson SR; Smith JC; Baudry J
J Phys Chem B; 2019 Jun; 123(25):5189-5195. PubMed ID: 30695645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Small Glycols Discover Cryptic Pockets on Proteins for Fragment-Based Approaches.
Bansia H; Mahanta P; Yennawar NH; Ramakumar S
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Mar; 61(3):1322-1333. PubMed ID: 33570386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Structure-Based Analysis of Cryptic-Site Opening.
Sun Z; Wakefield AE; Kolossvary I; Beglov D; Vajda S
Structure; 2020 Feb; 28(2):223-235.e2. PubMed ID: 31810712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic Docking: A Paradigm Shift in Computational Drug Discovery.
Gioia D; Bertazzo M; Recanatini M; Masetti M; Cavalli A
Molecules; 2017 Nov; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 29165360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coupling Molecular Dynamics and Deep Learning to Mine Protein Conformational Space.
Degiacomi MT
Structure; 2019 Jun; 27(6):1034-1040.e3. PubMed ID: 31031199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring Large Domain Motions in Proteins Using Atomistic Molecular Dynamics with Enhanced Conformational Sampling.
Dokainish HM; Sugita Y
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Dec; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 33383937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ligand-Binding-Site Refinement to Generate Reliable Holo Protein Structure Conformations from Apo Structures.
Guterres H; Park SJ; Jiang W; Im W
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Jan; 61(1):535-546. PubMed ID: 33337877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of Cryptic Binding Sites Using MixMD with Standard and Accelerated Molecular Dynamics.
Smith RD; Carlson HA
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Mar; 61(3):1287-1299. PubMed ID: 33599485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Significant enhancement of docking sensitivity using implicit ligand sampling.
Xu M; Lill MA
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Mar; 51(3):693-706. PubMed ID: 21375306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are induced fit protein conformational changes caused by ligand-binding predictable? A molecular dynamics investigation.
Gao C; Desaphy J; Vieth M
J Comput Chem; 2017 Jun; 38(15):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 28419481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CryptoSite: Expanding the Druggable Proteome by Characterization and Prediction of Cryptic Binding Sites.
Cimermancic P; Weinkam P; Rettenmaier TJ; Bichmann L; Keedy DA; Woldeyes RA; Schneidman-Duhovny D; Demerdash ON; Mitchell JC; Wells JA; Fraser JS; Sali A
J Mol Biol; 2016 Feb; 428(4):709-719. PubMed ID: 26854760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
