These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38317389)

  • 1.
    Sonkesriya S; Subramanian D; Saha P; Roy P; Panda S; Reddy U; Baig MM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Dec; 24(12):936-939. PubMed ID: 38317389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials-an in-vitro multi-centre study.
    Tejo SK; Kumar AG; Kattimani VS; Desai PD; Nalla S; Chaitanya K K
    Head Face Med; 2012 Oct; 8():27. PubMed ID: 23039395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative evaluation of three dimensional accuracy of different types of interocclusal recording materials - an
    Dwivedi A; Maru K; Sharma A
    Med Pharm Rep; 2020 Jul; 93(3):280-286. PubMed ID: 32832893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linear Dimensional Changes of Five Interocclusal Recording Materials When Immersed in Two Disinfectants for Different Time Intervals.
    Patel RK; Pai SA; Nagaraj T; Kohli A; Kj MJ; Bg S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jun; 20(6):732-737. PubMed ID: 31358718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Dimensional Stability and Surface Hardness of Interocclusal Recording Materials at Various Time Intervals: An
    Kumar P; Pacharne AP; Mishra SK
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(Suppl 1):S222-S224. PubMed ID: 36110786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records.
    Vergos VK; Tripodakis AP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 12956489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of dimensional stability, compressive resistance, and detail reproduction of thermoplastic resin (
    Koppolu SK; Manoharan PS; Rajkumar E; Ezhumalai G
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 36588377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility of interocclusal recording for mandibular removable partial denture in bilateral distal extension cases.
    Togano H; Hideshima M; Ohyama T
    J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Mar; 50(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12715920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of loading forces on the vertical accuracy of interocclusal records.
    Ghazal M; Kern M
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Feb; 41(2):e31-5. PubMed ID: 20165738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models.
    Sweeney S; Smith DK; Messersmith M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 26232833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Compressibility of two polyvinyl siloxane interocclusal record materials and its effect on mounted cast relationships.
    Campos AA; Nathanson D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Oct; 82(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 10512966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal recording materials.
    Ghazal M; Ludwig K; Habil RN; Kern M
    Quintessence Int; 2008 Oct; 39(9):727-32. PubMed ID: 19093044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional stability and surface hardness of inter-occlusal recording materials.
    N Gosai K; B Patel I; Poonia P; Sutaria B; Trivedi M; Mori S
    Bioinformation; 2024; 20(4):344-348. PubMed ID: 38854758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An
    Khan SA; Singh S; Neyaz N; Jaiswal MM; Tanwar AS; Singh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 34257178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and precision of occlusal contacts of stereolithographic casts mounted by digital interocclusal registrations.
    Krahenbuhl JT; Cho SH; Irelan J; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 27068319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation and comparison of resistance to compression of various interocclusal recording media: an in vitro study.
    Chandu GS; Khan MF; Mishra SK; Asnani P
    J Int Oral Health; 2015 May; 7(5):24-9. PubMed ID: 26028898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of three interocclusal recording materials used to mount a working cast.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL; Kinderknecht KE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Mar; 71(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 8164168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographic Appearance of Interocclusal Record Materials for Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Implant Surgeries.
    Mohunta VV; McGlumphy EA; Kim DG; Azer SS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(3):489-495. PubMed ID: 28494032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and dimension stability of scannable versus conventional interocclusal registration materials: An in vitro study.
    Yazigi C; Elsayed A; Wille S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):119-123. PubMed ID: 34736765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The ability of different materials to reproduce accurate records of interocclusal relationships in the vertical dimension.
    Ghazal M; Albashaireh ZS; Kern M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):816-20. PubMed ID: 18482345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.