146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38317597)
1. Automatic end-to-end VMAT treatment planning for rectal cancers.
Huang K; Chung C; Ludmir EB; Zhang L; Owens CA; Vega JG; Duryea J; Zhao Y; Chen X; Fuentes D; Cardenas CE; Briere TM; Beddar S; Court LE; Das P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 25(4):e14259. PubMed ID: 38317597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Self-configuring nnU-Net for automatic delineation of the organs at risk and target in high-dose rate cervical brachytherapy, a low/middle-income country's experience.
Duprez D; Trauernicht C; Simonds H; Williams O
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 24(8):e13988. PubMed ID: 37042449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing an AI-assisted planning pipeline for hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiotherapy.
Lin CY; Chou LS; Wu YH; Kuo JS; Mehta MP; Shiau AC; Liang JA; Hsu SM; Wang TH
Radiother Oncol; 2023 Apr; 181():109528. PubMed ID: 36773828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the clinical acceptability of deep learning contours of prostate and organs-at-risk in an automated prostate treatment planning process.
Duan J; Bernard M; Downes L; Willows B; Feng X; Mourad WF; St Clair W; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2570-2581. PubMed ID: 35147216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contour similarity and its implication on inverse prostate SBRT treatment planning.
Yan C; Guo B; Tendulkar R; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 24(2):e13809. PubMed ID: 36300837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers.
Wong J; Huang V; Wells D; Giambattista J; Giambattista J; Kolbeck C; Otto K; Saibishkumar EP; Alexander A
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jun; 16(1):101. PubMed ID: 34103062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for locally advanced rectal cancer: feasibility and efficiency.
Hirotaki K; Tomizawa K; Moriya S; Oyoshi H; Raturi V; Ito M; Sakae T
Radiat Oncol; 2023 Sep; 18(1):147. PubMed ID: 37670390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
Tran A; Zhang J; Woods K; Yu V; Nguyen D; Gustafson G; Rosen L; Sheng K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The dosimetric impact of deep learning-based auto-segmentation of organs at risk on nasopharyngeal and rectal cancer.
Guo H; Wang J; Xia X; Zhong Y; Peng J; Zhang Z; Hu W
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jun; 16(1):113. PubMed ID: 34162410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of Conebeam CT-based online adaptive radiotherapy for neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer.
de Jong R; Visser J; van Wieringen N; Wiersma J; Geijsen D; Bel A
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 16(1):136. PubMed ID: 34301300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial Evaluation of a Novel Cone-Beam CT-Based Semi-Automated Online Adaptive Radiotherapy System for Head and Neck Cancer Treatment - A Timing and Automation Quality Study.
Yoon SW; Lin H; Alonso-Basanta M; Anderson N; Apinorasethkul O; Cooper K; Dong L; Kempsey B; Marcel J; Metz J; Scheuermann R; Li T
Cureus; 2020 Aug; 12(8):e9660. PubMed ID: 32923257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. VMAT planning study in rectal cancer patients.
Shang J; Kong W; Wang YY; Ding Z; Yan G; Zhe H
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Oct; 9():219. PubMed ID: 25319073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical feasibility of deep learning-based auto-segmentation of target volumes and organs-at-risk in breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery.
Chung SY; Chang JS; Choi MS; Chang Y; Choi BS; Chun J; Keum KC; Kim JS; Kim YB
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Feb; 16(1):44. PubMed ID: 33632248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospects for daily online adaptive radiotherapy via ethos for prostate cancer patients without nodal involvement using unedited CBCT auto-segmentation.
Moazzezi M; Rose B; Kisling K; Moore KL; Ray X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 22(10):82-93. PubMed ID: 34432932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric and feasibility evaluation of a CBCT-based daily adaptive radiotherapy protocol for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Branco D; Mayadev J; Moore K; Ray X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jan; 24(1):e13783. PubMed ID: 36208134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic segmentation of the clinical target volume and organs at risk in the planning CT for rectal cancer using deep dilated convolutional neural networks.
Men K; Dai J; Li Y
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6377-6389. PubMed ID: 28963779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of deep learning-based automatic clinical target volume segmentation: a single-institution multi-site tumor experience.
Hou Z; Gao S; Liu J; Yin Y; Zhang L; Han Y; Yan J; Li S
Radiol Med; 2023 Oct; 128(10):1250-1261. PubMed ID: 37597126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Online adaptive radiotherapy compared to plan selection for rectal cancer: quantifying the benefit.
de Jong R; Crama KF; Visser J; van Wieringen N; Wiersma J; Geijsen ED; Bel A
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jul; 15(1):162. PubMed ID: 32641080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a commercial DIR platform for contour propagation in prostate cancer patients treated with IMRT/VMAT.
Hammers JE; Pirozzi S; Lindsay D; Kaidar-Person O; Tan X; Chen RC; Das SK; Mavroidis P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):14-25. PubMed ID: 32058663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of auto-contouring softwares in delineation of organs at risk in lung cancer and rectal cancer.
Chen W; Wang C; Zhan W; Jia Y; Ruan F; Qiu L; Yang S; Li Y
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):23002. PubMed ID: 34836989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
