These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38318949)

  • 1. Projected Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality Based on Observed Adherence to Colonoscopy and Sequential Stool-Based Screening.
    Meester RGS; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Winawer SJ; Church TR; Allen JI; Feld AD; Mills G; Jordan PA; Corley DA; Doubeni CA; Hahn AI; Lobaugh SM; Fleisher M; O'Brien MJ; Zauber AG
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2024 Jul; 119(7):1392-1401. PubMed ID: 38318949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized Trial of Facilitated Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy vs Sequential Fecal-Based Blood Test.
    Zauber AG; Winawer SJ; O'Brien MJ; Mills GM; Allen JI; Feld AD; Jordan PA; Fleisher M; Orlow I; Meester RGS; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Knudsen AB; Mandelson M; Shaukat A; Mendelsohn RB; Hahn AI; Lobaugh SM; Soto Palmer B; Serrano V; Kumar JR; Fischer SE; Chen JC; Bayuga-Miller S; Kuk D; O'Connell K; Church TR
    Gastroenterology; 2023 Jul; 165(1):252-266. PubMed ID: 36948424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the impact of differential adherence on the comparative effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening using the CRC-AIM microsimulation model.
    Piscitello A; Saoud L; Fendrick AM; Borah BJ; Hassmiller Lich K; Matney M; Ozbay AB; Parton M; Limburg PJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244431. PubMed ID: 33373409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Patient Adherence to Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening and Colonoscopy Following a Positive Test on Clinical Outcomes.
    Fendrick AM; Fisher DA; Saoud L; Ozbay AB; Karlitz JJ; Limburg PJ
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2021 Sep; 14(9):845-850. PubMed ID: 34021023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interval Colorectal Cancer Incidence Among Subjects Undergoing Multiple Rounds of Fecal Immunochemical Testing.
    van der Vlugt M; Grobbee EJ; Bossuyt PMM; Bos A; Bongers E; Spijker W; Kuipers EJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Aug; 153(2):439-447.e2. PubMed ID: 28483499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying the impact of adherence to screening strategies on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.
    D'Andrea E; Ahnen DJ; Sussman DA; Najafzadeh M
    Cancer Med; 2020 Jan; 9(2):824-836. PubMed ID: 31777197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2009; 9(10):1-40. PubMed ID: 23074514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longitudinal Adherence to Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing vs Guaiac-based FOBT in an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.
    Benito L; Travier N; Binefa G; Vidal C; Espinosa J; Milà N; Garcia M
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2019 May; 12(5):327-334. PubMed ID: 30890542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Healthcare costs, resource utilization, and productivity loss associated with colorectal cancer screening.
    Engel-Nitz NM; Miller-Wilson LA; Le L; Fisher DA
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2023; 23(7):843-852. PubMed ID: 37462667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rescreening of persons with a negative colonoscopy result: results from a microsimulation model.
    Knudsen AB; Hur C; Gazelle GS; Schrag D; McFarland EG; Kuntz KM
    Ann Intern Med; 2012 Nov; 157(9):611-20. PubMed ID: 23128861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-world cost-effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening in a Medicare population.
    Fisher DA; Karlitz JJ; Jeyakumar S; Smith N; Limburg P; Lieberman D; Fendrick AM
    J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):654-664. PubMed ID: 33902366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
    Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is the patient activation measure associated with adherence to colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test result?
    Azulay R; Valinsky L; Hershkowitz F; Magnezi R
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2018 Dec; 7(1):74. PubMed ID: 30577883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Lin JS; Perdue LA; Henrikson NB; Bean SI; Blasi PR
    JAMA; 2021 May; 325(19):1978-1998. PubMed ID: 34003220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immunochemical testing of individuals positive for guaiac faecal occult blood test in a screening programme for colorectal cancer: an observational study.
    Fraser CG; Matthew CM; Mowat NA; Wilson JA; Carey FA; Steele RJ
    Lancet Oncol; 2006 Feb; 7(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 16455476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a microsimulation modelling study.
    Buskermolen M; Cenin DR; Helsingen LM; Guyatt G; Vandvik PO; Haug U; Bretthauer M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    BMJ; 2019 Oct; 367():l5383. PubMed ID: 31578177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-Effectiveness of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing vs Colonoscopy or Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Alaska Native People.
    Redwood DG; Dinh TA; Kisiel JB; Borah BJ; Moriarty JP; Provost EM; Sacco FD; Tiesinga JJ; Ahlquist DA
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2021 May; 96(5):1203-1217. PubMed ID: 33840520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Knudsen AB; Zauber AG; Rutter CM; Naber SK; Doria-Rose VP; Pabiniak C; Johanson C; Fischer SE; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuntz KM
    JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2595-609. PubMed ID: 27305518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Faecal immunochemical tests versus colonoscopy for post-polypectomy surveillance: an accuracy, acceptability and economic study.
    Atkin W; Cross AJ; Kralj-Hans I; MacRae E; Piggott C; Pearson S; Wooldrage K; Brown J; Lucas F; Prendergast A; Marchevsky N; Patel B; Pack K; Howe R; Skrobanski H; Kerrison R; Swart N; Snowball J; Duffy SW; Morris S; von Wagner C; Halloran S
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jan; 23(1):1-84. PubMed ID: 30618357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies.
    Inadomi JM; Vijan S; Janz NK; Fagerlin A; Thomas JP; Lin YV; Muñoz R; Lau C; Somsouk M; El-Nachef N; Hayward RA
    Arch Intern Med; 2012 Apr; 172(7):575-82. PubMed ID: 22493463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.