123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3831943)
1. The effect of screening on the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in Finland.
Hakulinen T; Hakama M
Nowotwory; 1985; 35(4):290-6. PubMed ID: 3831943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of population screening for carcinoma of the uterine cervix in Finland.
Hakama M
Maturitas; 1985 May; 7(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 4021826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organised screening programmes.
Lăără E; Day NE; Hakama M
Lancet; 1987 May; 1(8544):1247-9. PubMed ID: 2884378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mass screening programmes and trends in cervical cancer in Finland and the Netherlands.
van der Aa MA; Pukkala E; Coebergh JW; Anttila A; Siesling S
Int J Cancer; 2008 Apr; 122(8):1854-8. PubMed ID: 18067129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical cancer screening programme in Finland.
Anttila A; Nieminen P
Eur J Cancer; 2000 Nov; 36(17):2209-14. PubMed ID: 11072206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in Finland].
Kallio M; Nieminen P; Hakama M
Duodecim; 1995; 111(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 8654284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A screening programme for cervical cancer that worked.
Hakama M; Louhivuori K
Cancer Surv; 1988; 7(3):403-16. PubMed ID: 3242792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical cancer incidence and mortality trends in Finland and Estonia: a screened vs. an unscreened population.
Aareleid T; Pukkala E; Thomson H; Hakama M
Eur J Cancer; 1993; 29A(5):745-9. PubMed ID: 8471334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of organised screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Finland, 1963-1995: recent increase in cervical cancer incidence.
Anttila A; Pukkala E; Söderman B; Kallio M; Nieminen P; Hakama M
Int J Cancer; 1999 Sep; 83(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 10449609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Organization and quality control in screening for cervical cancer in Finland.
Kauraniemi T
Nowotwory; 1985; 35(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 3831942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer.
Louhivuori K
Cancer Detect Prev; 1991; 15(6):471-5. PubMed ID: 1782637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The (in)efficiency of cervical screening in Europe.
Miller AB
Eur J Cancer; 2002 Feb; 38(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 11818195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical cancer. Mass screening, incidence and mortality in Finland.
Timonen S; Pyörälä T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1977; 67():13-9. PubMed ID: 269640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Letter: Cervical screening.
Timonen S; Nieminen U; Kauraniemi T
Lancet; 1974 Mar; 1(7854):401-2. PubMed ID: 4131045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the impact of screening for cancer of the cervix.
Miller AB
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):149-60. PubMed ID: 3570400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.
Day NE
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 6717876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The significance of organized screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark during 1968-1987].
Lynge E; Engholm G; Madsen M
Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(19):1330-4. PubMed ID: 1598705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lessons from a cervical screening programme: are they transferable?
Fleischl J
Nurs Prax N Z; 1993 Jul; 8(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 8364340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Does screening for cervical cancer affect incidence and mortality trends? The Belgian experience.
de Schryver A
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol; 1989 Feb; 25(2):395-9. PubMed ID: 2702994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cancer screening: a time for reappraisal in Canada.
Miller AB
Can J Public Health; 1988; 79(2):90-1. PubMed ID: 3383066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
