137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38320330)
1. FDG PET/CT may replace bone marrow biopsy for the evaluation of bone marrow involvement in selected mature T- and natural killer-cell lymphomas: A meta-analysis.
Guo L; Wang R; Hou N; Kuang A; Shen G
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Mar; 172():111353. PubMed ID: 38320330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT in detecting bone marrow involvement in newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma: is bone marrow biopsy still necessary?
Adams HJ; Kwee TC; de Keizer B; Fijnheer R; de Klerk JM; Littooij AS; Nievelstein RA
Ann Oncol; 2014 May; 25(5):921-7. PubMed ID: 24351400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FDG-PET/CT versus bone marrow biopsy in bone marrow involvement in newly diagnosed paediatric lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li Z; Li C; Chen B; Shi L; Gao F; Wang P; Sun W
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Aug; 16(1):482. PubMed ID: 34372894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone marrow 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography cannot replace bone marrow biopsy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Adams HJ; Kwee TC; Fijnheer R; Dubois SV; Nievelstein RA; de Klerk JM
Am J Hematol; 2014 Jul; 89(7):726-31. PubMed ID: 24711255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic Importance of Bone Marrow Uptake on Baseline
Soydal C; Koksoy EB; Yasar A; Turgal E; Erdogan BD; Akbulut H; Kucuk NO
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2016 Dec; 31(10):361-365. PubMed ID: 27996313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PET/CT-based bone-marrow assessment shows potential in replacing routine bone-marrow biopsy in part of patients newly diagnosed with extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma.
Wang Y; Xie L; Tian R; Deng Y; Zhang W; Zou L; Zhang H; Liu J; Zhao S; Ding W; Liu W; Jiang M
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 145(10):2529-2539. PubMed ID: 31485768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct comparison of visual and quantitative bone marrow FDG-PET/CT findings with bone marrow biopsy results in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: does bone marrow FDG-PET/CT live up to its promise?
Adams HJ; Kwee TC; Fijnheer R; Dubois SV; Nievelstein RA; de Klerk JM
Acta Radiol; 2015 Oct; 56(10):1230-5. PubMed ID: 25387723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Prognostic value of bone marrow (18)F-FDG uptake pattern of pretreatment PET-CT in extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma].
Zhang Y; Zhou J; Wang L; Li JY; Ding CY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 42(10):885-890. PubMed ID: 33113633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of
Jitani AK; Dutta S; Mandal PK; De R; Jajodia E; Baul S; Chakrabarti P; Dolai TK
Indian J Med Res; 2021 May; 154(5):691-698. PubMed ID: 35532587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. FDG PET/CT for the detection of bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Adams HJ; Kwee TC; de Keizer B; Fijnheer R; de Klerk JM; Nievelstein RA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Mar; 41(3):565-74. PubMed ID: 24281821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Whole-body MRI, FDG-PET/CT, and bone marrow biopsy, for the assessment of bone marrow involvement in patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma.
Albano D; Patti C; Lagalla R; Midiri M; Galia M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Apr; 45(4):1082-1089. PubMed ID: 27603267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of Bone Marrow Involvement in Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma: Positron Emission Tomography versus Bone Marrow Biopsy, and the Significance of Minimal Involvement by EBV+ Cells (KROG 18-09).
Lee TH; Kim HJ; Lee JH; Lee J; Kim JH; Oh D; Eom KY
Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Apr; 56(2):688-696. PubMed ID: 38097921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of FDG PET/CT in identification of bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma: comparison with iliac crest bone marrow biopsy.
Teagle AR; Barton H; Charles-Edwards E; Dizdarevic S; Chevassut T
Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1476-1484. PubMed ID: 28382828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is it sufficient to evaluate bone marrow involvement in newly diagnosed lymphomas using
Hao B; Zhao L; Luo NN; Ruan D; Pang YZ; Guo W; Fu H; Guo XY; Luo ZM; Wu J; Chen HJ; Wu H; Sun L
BMC Cancer; 2018 Nov; 18(1):1192. PubMed ID: 30497426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, determination of bone marrow involvement with 18F-FDG PET/CT provides better diagnostic performance and prognostic stratification than does biopsy.
Berthet L; Cochet A; Kanoun S; Berriolo-Riedinger A; Humbert O; Toubeau M; Dygai-Cochet I; Legouge C; Casasnovas O; Brunotte F
J Nucl Med; 2013 Aug; 54(8):1244-50. PubMed ID: 23674577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone Marrow Involvement in Malignant Lymphoma: Evaluation of Quantitative PET and MRI Biomarkers.
Asenbaum U; Nolz R; Karanikas G; Furtner J; Woitek R; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Raderer M; Mayerhoefer ME
Acad Radiol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 29199055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct comparison of diagnostic accuracies of F-18 FDG PET and MRI for detection of bone marrow involvement in lymphoma patients; A meta-analysis.
Kim K; Kim SJ
Leuk Res; 2020 Dec; 99():106475. PubMed ID: 33189988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pre-treatment [
Chen J; Zhao Y
Hematology; 2024 Dec; 29(1):2325317. PubMed ID: 38465661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utilization of 18F-FDG PET/CT as a staging tool in patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma.
Cho SF; Chang CC; Liu YC; Chang CS; Hsiao HH; Liu TC; Huang CT; Lin SF
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 Mar; 31(3):130-7. PubMed ID: 25744235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FDG PET/CT to detect bone marrow involvement in the initial staging of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results from the prospective, multicenter PETAL and OPTIMAL>60 trials.
Kaddu-Mulindwa D; Altmann B; Held G; Angel S; Stilgenbauer S; Thurner L; Bewarder M; Schwier M; Pfreundschuh M; Löffler M; Menhart K; Grosse J; Ziepert M; Herrmann K; Dührsen U; Hüttmann A; Barbato F; Poeschel V; Hellwig D
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Oct; 48(11):3550-3559. PubMed ID: 33928400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
