174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38321439)
1. Breast cancer screening and early diagnosis in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis on 10.72 million women.
Li M; Wang H; Qu N; Piao H; Zhu B
BMC Womens Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):97. PubMed ID: 38321439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang L; Wang S; Zhang L; Sheng C; Song F; Wang P; Huang Y
BMC Cancer; 2020 Jun; 20(1):499. PubMed ID: 32487106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Breast ultrasound optimization process analysis based on breast cancer screening for 1 501 753 rural women in China].
Ma L; Lian ZQ; Zhao YX; Di JL; Song B; Ren WH; Miao HZ; Wu JL; Wang Q
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 43(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 33902214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Volumetric breast density and risk of advanced cancers after a negative screening episode: a cohort study.
Puliti D; Zappa M; Giorgi Rossi P; Pierpaoli E; Manneschi G; Ambrogetti D; Ventura L; Mantellini P;
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Aug; 20(1):95. PubMed ID: 30092817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis or Mammography: A Meta-analysis of Cancer Detection and Recall.
Marinovich ML; Hunter KE; Macaskill P; Houssami N
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2018 Sep; 110(9):942-949. PubMed ID: 30107542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Dense Breasts and Negative Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hussein H; Abbas E; Keshavarzi S; Fazelzad R; Bukhanov K; Kulkarni S; Au F; Ghai S; Alabousi A; Freitas V
Radiology; 2023 Mar; 306(3):e221785. PubMed ID: 36719288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Higher Detection Rates of Biologically Aggressive Breast Cancers in Mammography Screening than in the Biennial Interval.
Prange A; Bokhof B; Polzer P; Tio J; Radke I; Heidinger O; Heindel W; Weigel S
Rofo; 2019 Feb; 191(2):130-136. PubMed ID: 30103233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An individual participant data meta-analysis of breast cancer detection and recall rates for digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography population screening.
Libesman S; Zackrisson S; Hofvind S; Seidler AL; Bernardi D; Lång K; Robledo KP; Houssami N
Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Jul; 22(5):e647-e654. PubMed ID: 35246389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer detection using single-reading of breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) compared to double-reading of 2D-mammography: Evidence from a population-based trial.
Houssami N; Bernardi D; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Macaskill P
Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 47():94-99. PubMed ID: 28192742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital Mammography Screening: Does Age Influence the Detection Rates of Low-, Intermediate-, and High-Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ?
Weigel S; Hense HW; Heidrich J; Berkemeyer S; Heindel W; Heidinger O
Radiology; 2016 Mar; 278(3):707-13. PubMed ID: 26505802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meta-analysis of prospective studies evaluating breast cancer detection and interval cancer rates for digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography population screening.
Houssami N; Zackrisson S; Blazek K; Hunter K; Bernardi D; Lång K; Hofvind S
Eur J Cancer; 2021 May; 148():14-23. PubMed ID: 33706172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.
Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA
Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of digital mammography on screening a young cohort of women for breast cancer in an urban specialist breast unit.
Perry NM; Patani N; Milner SE; Pinker K; Mokbel K; Allgood PC; Duffy SW
Eur Radiol; 2011 Apr; 21(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 20886340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and evaluation of the screening performance of a low-cost high-risk screening strategy for breast cancer.
Huang Y; Wang H; Lyu Z; Dai H; Liu P; Zhu Y; Song F; Chen K
Cancer Biol Med; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1375-84. PubMed ID: 34570443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a population-based breast cancer screening in North China.
Wu S; Liang D; Shi J; Li D; Liu Y; Hao Y; Shi M; Du X; He Y
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Sep; 149(12):10119-10130. PubMed ID: 37266660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Accuracy and direct medical cost of different screening modalities for breast cancer among Chinese women].
Kang M; Zhao Y; Huang Y; Li J; Liu L; Li H
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 36(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 24785288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of Screening Ultrasonography as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography in Women Across the Spectrum of Breast Cancer Risk.
Lee JM; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Smith RA; Henderson LM; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
JAMA Intern Med; 2019 May; 179(5):658-667. PubMed ID: 30882843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is there any added value to substitute the 2D digital MLO projection for a MLO tomosynthesis projection and its synthetic view when a 2D standard digital mammography is used in a one-stop-shop immediate reading mammography screening?
Mesurolle B; El Khoury M; Travade A; Bagard C; Pétrou A; Monghal C
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9529-9539. PubMed ID: 34047846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Jänsch A; Hacker A; Weinand S; Vogelmann T
Eur Radiol; 2022 Apr; 32(4):2301-2312. PubMed ID: 34694451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
