133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38324231)
1. Cell block practices in European cytopathology laboratories.
Srebotnik Kirbis I; Kholova I; Huhtala H; Bongiovanni M; Strojan Flezar M; Hodgson C; Cochand-Priollet B
Cancer Cytopathol; 2024 Apr; 132(4):250-259. PubMed ID: 38324231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immunocytochemistry practices in European cytopathology laboratories-Review of European Federation of Cytology Societies (EFCS) online survey results with best practice recommendations.
Srebotnik Kirbiš I; Rodrigues Roque R; Bongiovanni M; Strojan Fležar M; Cochand-Priollet B
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Oct; 128(10):757-766. PubMed ID: 32598103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated Cellient(™) cytoblocks: better, stronger, faster?
Prendeville S; Brosnan T; Browne TJ; McCarthy J
Cytopathology; 2014 Dec; 25(6):372-80. PubMed ID: 24943912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cell Block in Cytological Diagnostics: Review of Preparatory Techniques.
Krogerus L; Kholová I
Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 29909418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cell blocks in cytopathology: An update.
Nambirajan A; Jain D
Cytopathology; 2018 Dec; 29(6):505-524. PubMed ID: 30153355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cell blocks in cytology: review of preparation methods, advantages, and limitations.
Torous VF; Cuda JM; Manucha V; Randolph ML; Shi Q; VandenBussche CJ;
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2023; 12(2):77-88. PubMed ID: 36528492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The state of cell block variation and satisfaction in the era of molecular diagnostics and personalized medicine.
Crapanzano JP; Heymann JJ; Monaco S; Nassar A; Saqi A
Cytojournal; 2014; 11():7. PubMed ID: 24799951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cell blocks in cytopathology: a review of preparative methods, utility in diagnosis and role in ancillary studies.
Jain D; Mathur SR; Iyer VK
Cytopathology; 2014 Dec; 25(6):356-71. PubMed ID: 25113785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Novel disposable cell block processing device and method for high cellular yield.
Saqi A; Yeager KJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 May; 127(5):316-324. PubMed ID: 31025829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel method for making cell blocks with higher cellular yield.
Liu H; Huang Z; Li W; Cao Z; Luo B; Peng Y; Liu Y; Zheng G; He Q
Diagn Cytopathol; 2023 Mar; 51(3):182-190. PubMed ID: 36422056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sodium Alginate versus Plasma Thrombin Cell Blocks in Diagnostic Cytopathology: A Comparative Analysis.
Gupta S; Gautam U; Susheilia S; Bansal B; Uppal R; Srinivasan R
Acta Cytol; 2022; 66(1):72-78. PubMed ID: 34718240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A study of cellular counting to determine minimum thresholds for adequacy for liquid-based cervical cytology using a survey and counting protocol.
Kitchener HC; Gittins M; Desai M; Smith JH; Cook G; Roberts C; Turnbull L
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Mar; 19(22):i-xix, 1-64. PubMed ID: 25774649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of plasma-thrombin, HistoGel, and CellGel cell block preparation methods with paired ThinPrep slides in the setting of mediastinal granulomatous disease.
Torous VF; Chen Y; VanderLaan PA
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(2):52-60. PubMed ID: 31287420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immunohistochemistry practices of cytopathology laboratories: a survey of participants in the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program.
Fischer AH; Schwartz MR; Moriarty AT; Wilbur DC; Souers R; Fatheree L; Booth CN; Clayton AC; Kurtyz DF; Padmanabhan V; Crothers BA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Sep; 138(9):1167-72. PubMed ID: 24840035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-contamination in cytology processing: a review of current practice.
Roberson J; Cuda JM; Davis Floyd AD; McGrath CM; Russell DK; Wendel-Spiczka A; VandenBussche CJ; Reynolds JP;
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2022; 11(4):194-200. PubMed ID: 35610099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. It is all in the bag: collodion bag versus HistoGel cell block method.
Wilgenbusch H; Molm C; Aslan D; Berg B
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(1):20-25. PubMed ID: 31422016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical proficiency in cytopathology: assessment through external quality assurance.
Cummings MC; Greaves J; Shukor RA; Perkins G; Ross J
Cytopathology; 2017 Apr; 28(2):149-156. PubMed ID: 27678252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cytology-histology correlation of cervical Papanicolaou smears and biopsies performed at a single institution compared to those performed at different institutions.
Nikolaus Y; Mujumdar V; Padgaonkar P; Buchanan E; Goldberg A
Cytopathology; 2023 Jan; 34(1):61-65. PubMed ID: 36148769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Practice Patterns in Urinary Cytopathology Prior to the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.
Barkan GA; Tabatabai ZL; Kurtycz DFI; Padmanabhan V; Souers RJ; Nayar R; Sturgis CD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 Feb; 144(2):172-176. PubMed ID: 31295017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of CytoMatrix for the diagnosis of melanoma metastases on FNA cytology samples: Performance of a novel cell block method.
Montella M; Cozzolino I; Zito Marino F; Clery E; Carraturo E; Brancaccio G; Argenziano G; Troiani T; Savarese G; Berretta M; Franco R; Ronchi A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2023 Aug; 131(8):516-525. PubMed ID: 37195098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
