115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38324508)
1. Glandular doses and diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for Saudi breast cancer screening programme (2012-2021).
Albeshan SM; Alhulail AA; Almuqbil MM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Apr; 200(5):467-472. PubMed ID: 38324508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammography Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) in Ghana.
Dzidzornu E; Angmorterh SK; Ofori-Manteaw BB; Aboagye S; Dzefi-Tettey K; Ofori EK
Radiography (Lond); 2021 May; 27(2):611-616. PubMed ID: 33342686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Mammography in Dubai.
Abdulwahid Noor K; Mohd Norsuddin N; Abdul Karim MK; Che Isa IN; Alshamsi W
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38201317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. INSTITUTIONAL BREAST DOSES IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY.
Lekatou A; Metaxas V; Messaris G; Antzele P; Tzavellas G; Panayiotakis G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(2):239-251. PubMed ID: 30753684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in a Tertiary Hospital in Malaysia.
Mohd Norsuddin N; Segar S; Ravintaran R; Mohd Zain N; Abdul Karim MK
Healthcare (Basel); 2022 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 36292364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient dose in digital mammography.
Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Setting Scottish diagnostic reference levels for mammography incorporating both craniocaudal and oblique projections between 30 and 80 mm.
Weir A; Schofield KA; McCurrach A
J Radiol Prot; 2021 Feb; 41(1):. PubMed ID: 33684070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Regression Analysis between the Different Breast Dose Quantities Reported in Digital Mammography and Patient Age, Breast Thickness, and Acquisition Parameters.
Dhou S; Dalah E; AlGhafeer R; Hamidu A; Obaideen A
J Imaging; 2022 Jul; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 36005454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose management software implementation in mammography.
Samara ET; Tsapaki V; Sramek D
Phys Med; 2019 Dec; 68():88-95. PubMed ID: 31765886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of average glandular dose (AGD) in screening and diagnostic digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) towards establishing a reference dose range band (DRB): a developing country experience.
Jeyasugiththan J; Maheshika Bandara BGU; Wickramarathna SHD; Thenuwara H; Satharasinghe D; Pallewatte AS; Hettiarachchi P
J Radiol Prot; 2023 Jul; 43(3):. PubMed ID: 37463573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends in patient dose and compression force for digital (DR) mammography systems over an eleven-year period.
Ramnarain J; Cartwright L; Diffey J
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2024 Mar; 47(1):215-222. PubMed ID: 38019445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A survey on mean glandular dose in mammography examination and the factors affecting it in Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd, Iran.
Asadollahzadeh N; Razavi S; Zare MH
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38811346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of average glandular dose and investigation of the relationship with compressed breast thickness in dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Fusco R; Raiano N; Raiano C; Maio F; Vallone P; Mattace Raso M; Setola SV; Granata V; Rubulotta MR; Barretta ML; Petrosino T; Petrillo A
Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108912. PubMed ID: 32151787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimated Average Glandular Dose for 1,828 Mammography Procedures in China: A Multicenter Study.
DU X; Wang J; Zhu BL
Biomed Environ Sci; 2019 Apr; 32(4):242-249. PubMed ID: 31217060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) for full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) procedures in Morocco.
Talbi M; Mansouri ME; Nhila O; Tahiri Z; Eddaoui K; Khalis M
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2022 Jun; 53(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 35365437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Local diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography: Two hospitals study in northwest, Nigeria.
Garba I; Bashir HS; Bello F; Nuhu KS; Mohammed S; Mansur Y; Lawal Y
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 52(3):435-442. PubMed ID: 33896746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Towards proposition of a diagnostic reference level for mammographic examination in the greater Khorasan Province, Iran.
Bahreyni Toossi MT; Zare H; Bayani Roodi Sh; Hashemi M; Akbari F; Malekzadeh M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 23209184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of patient dose during a digital breast tomosynthesis.
Shakya S; Sulwathura U; Wickramanayake M; Dulshara T; Herath LHMIM; Wickramasinghe WMIS; Senanayake G
Radiography (Lond); 2023 May; 29(3):573-576. PubMed ID: 36996507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: Improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force.
de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Branderhorst W; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081901. PubMed ID: 23927315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
