These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38325145)

  • 1. Reliabilty of recording occlusal contacts by using intraoral scanner and articulating paper - A prospective study.
    Esposito R; Masedu F; Cicciù M; Tepedino M; Denaro M; Ciavarella D
    J Dent; 2024 Mar; 142():104872. PubMed ID: 38325145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Insights into Occlusal Analysis: Articulating Paper versus Digital Devices.
    Manziuc MM; Savu MM; Almăşan O; Leucuţa DC; Tăut M; Ifrim C; Berindean D; Kui A; Negucioiu M; Buduru S
    J Clin Med; 2024 Aug; 13(15):. PubMed ID: 39124772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical study comparing the accuracy of interocclusal records, digitally obtained by three different devices.
    Fraile C; Ferreiroa A; Romeo M; Alonso R; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1957-1962. PubMed ID: 34519908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraoral versus extraoral digital occlusal records: a pilot study.
    Fraile C; Ferreiroa A; Solaberrieta E; Pradíes G
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(4):329-333. PubMed ID: 30539175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical study on the accuracy of occlusal contacts on digital model].
    Liu HL; Liu XG; Tian YM; Ni L; Zheng DX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 55(10):737-742. PubMed ID: 33045784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Study of Occlusal Contact Marking Indicators.
    Bozhkova TP
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2020 Mar; 62(1):180-184. PubMed ID: 32337889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Preliminary study on three digital analysis methods for analyzing the distribution and area of occlusal contacts].
    Xiao N; Sun YC; Zhao YJ; Wang Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):144-151. PubMed ID: 32071478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical investigations of the comparability of different methods used to display occlusal contact points.
    Heuser F; Bourauel C; Stark H; Dörsam I
    Int J Comput Dent; 2020; 23(3):245-255. PubMed ID: 32789312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aspects of Occlusal Recordings Performed with the T-Scan System and with the Medit Intraoral Scanner.
    Popa AD; Vlăduțu DE; Turcu AA; Târtea DA; Ionescu M; Păunescu C; Stan RS; Mercuț V
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Jul; 14(13):. PubMed ID: 39001349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Study Qualitative and Quantitative Techniques in the Study of Occlusion.
    Bozhkova T; Musurlieva N; Slavchev D
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():1163874. PubMed ID: 34604379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Influence of intraoral scan and dental cast scan on occlusal quantitative analysis of virtual dental model].
    Cheng MX; Jiang T; Sun YC; Zhang HY
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Feb; 50(1):136-140. PubMed ID: 29483736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of digital and conventional systems in locating occlusal contacts: A clinical study.
    Rovira-Lastra B; Khoury-Ribas L; Flores-Orozco EI; Ayuso-Montero R; Chaurasia A; Martinez-Gomis J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):115-122. PubMed ID: 37612195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of the agreement between virtual and clinical occlusal registrations: A comparative clinical study.
    Biadsee A; Biadsee A; Khalifa A; Mtanis T; Ormianer Z
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37612193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinician accuracy when subjectively interpreting articulating paper markings.
    Kerstein RB; Radke J
    Cranio; 2014 Jan; 32(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 24660642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks using transparent acetate sheet.
    Davies S; Al-Ani Z; Jeremiah H; Winston D; Smith P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):458-61. PubMed ID: 16275307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A digital poll of dentists testing the accuracy of paper mark subjective interpretation.
    Sutter BA
    Cranio; 2018 Nov; 36(6):396-403. PubMed ID: 28792294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A method for three-dimensional analysis of occlusal contacts from digital dental casts].
    Zhao YJ; Wang Y; LV PJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2008 Feb; 40(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 18278153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Construction of virtual intercuspal occlusion: Considering tooth displacement.
    Li L; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 2021 Jun; 48(6):701-710. PubMed ID: 33486815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of load and indicator type upon occlusal contact markings.
    Saad MN; Weiner G; Ehrenberg D; Weiner S
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2008 Apr; 85(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17618516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of qualitative occlusal tooth wear evaluation using an intraoral scanner: A pilot study.
    Travassos da Rosa Moreira Bastos R; Teixeira da Silva P; Normando D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0249119. PubMed ID: 33765042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.