141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38327609)
21. Unidimensional IRT Item Parameter Estimates Across Equivalent Test Forms With Confounding Specifications Within Dimensions.
Matlock KL; Turner R
Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Apr; 76(2):258-279. PubMed ID: 29795865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Comparison of ML, WLSMV, and Bayesian Methods for Multilevel Structural Equation Models in Small Samples: A Simulation Study.
Holtmann J; Koch T; Lochner K; Eid M
Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):661-680. PubMed ID: 27594086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Estimating meaningful thresholds for multi-item questionnaires using item response theory.
Terluin B; Koopman JE; Hoogendam L; Griffiths P; Terwee CB; Bjorner JB
Qual Life Res; 2023 Jun; 32(6):1819-1830. PubMed ID: 36780033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Score-based measurement invariance checks for Bayesian maximum-a-posteriori estimates in item response theory.
Debelak R; Pawel S; Strobl C; Merkle EC
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 Nov; 75(3):728-752. PubMed ID: 35670000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Arab Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS) by Item Response Theory Modeling (IRT).
Khazaal Y; El Abiddine FZ; Penzenstadler L; Berbiche D; Bteich G; Valizadeh-Haghi S; Rochat L; Achab S; Khan R; Chatton A
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36231401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Exploration and analysis of a generalized one-parameter item response model with flexible link functions.
Wang X; Zhang J; Lu J; Cheng G; Shi N
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1248454. PubMed ID: 37711320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Accuracy of Bayesian Model Fit Indices in Selecting Among Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models.
Fujimoto KA; Falk CF
Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Apr; 84(2):217-244. PubMed ID: 38898878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Hierarchical Multi-Unidimensional IRT Approach for Analyzing Sparse, Multi-Group Data for Integrative Data Analysis.
Huo Y; de la Torre J; Mun EY; Kim SY; Ray AE; Jiao Y; White HR
Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):834-55. PubMed ID: 25265910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An Investigation of Age-Related Differential Item Functioning in the EQ-5D-5L Using Item Response Theory and Logistic Regression.
Penton H; Dayson C; Hulme C; Young T
Value Health; 2022 Sep; 25(9):1566-1574. PubMed ID: 35487819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Parameter Recovery in Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models Under Complexity and Nonnormality.
Svetina D; Valdivia A; Underhill S; Dai S; Wang X
Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Oct; 41(7):530-544. PubMed ID: 29881104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.
Lee H; Smith WZ
Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):578-603. PubMed ID: 32425220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.
Park YS; Lee YS; Xing K
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():255. PubMed ID: 26941699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Impact of Sample Size and Various Other Factors on Estimation of Dichotomous Mixture IRT Models.
Sen S; Cohen AS
Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Jun; 83(3):520-555. PubMed ID: 37187690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Joint modeling of the two-alternative multidimensional forced-choice personality measurement and its response time by a Thurstonian D-diffusion item response model.
Bunji K; Okada K
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):1091-1107. PubMed ID: 32394181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Revisiting the 4-Parameter Item Response Model: Bayesian Estimation and Application.
Culpepper SA
Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1142-1163. PubMed ID: 26400070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Compromised item detection: A Bayesian change-point perspective.
Du Y; Zhang S; Chang HH
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):131-153. PubMed ID: 36069306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of globally obtained informative priors on bayesian safety performance functions developed for Australian crash data.
Afghari AP; Haque MM; Washington S; Smyth T
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():55-65. PubMed ID: 31108237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Scoring Depression on a Common Metric: A Comparison of EAP Estimation, Plausible Value Imputation, and Full Bayesian IRT Modeling.
Fischer HF; Rose M
Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):85-99. PubMed ID: 30235003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
