131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38329221)
1. The experiences of the elderly regarding the use of rehabilitation assistive technologies: a directed qualitative content analysis.
Goodarzi F; Barati M; Bashirian S; Ayubi E; Rahbar S; Cheraghi P
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Feb; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 38329221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What factors determine therapists' acceptance of new technologies for rehabilitation – a study using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT).
Liu L; Miguel Cruz A; Rios Rincon A; Buttar V; Ranson Q; Goertzen D
Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(5):447-55. PubMed ID: 24901351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comprehensive Senior Technology Acceptance Model of Daily Living Assistive Technology for Older Adults With Frailty: Cross-sectional Study.
Shin HR; Um SR; Yoon HJ; Choi EY; Shin WC; Lee HY; Kim YS
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Apr; 25():e41935. PubMed ID: 37036760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technology acceptance and perceptions of robotic assistive devices by older adults - implications for exoskeleton design.
Shore L; de Eyto A; O'Sullivan L
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2022 Oct; 17(7):782-790. PubMed ID: 32988251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting adoption of the assistive technology open platform: extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology.
Kim AJ; An KO; Yang J; Rho ER; Shim J; Eun SD
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Feb; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 38357965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of assistive technologies after stroke is debunking the myths about the elderly.
Tomšič M; Domajnko B; Zajc M
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 25(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 28934907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assistive technologies after stroke: self-management or fending for yourself? A focus group study.
Demain S; Burridge J; Ellis-Hill C; Hughes AM; Yardley L; Tedesco-Triccas L; Swain I
BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Aug; 13():334. PubMed ID: 23968362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Restorative rehabilitation robotics to promote function, independence and dignity: users' perspectives on clinical applications.
Hampshire L; Dehghani-Sanij A; O'Connor RJ
J Med Eng Technol; 2022 Aug; 46(6):527-535. PubMed ID: 35730525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Child and parent perceptions of acceptability and therapeutic value of a socially assistive robot used during pediatric rehabilitation.
Butchart J; Harrison R; Ritchie J; Martí F; McCarthy C; Knight S; Scheinberg A
Disabil Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 43(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 31120794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Geospatial assistive technologies for wheelchair users: a scoping review of usability measures and criteria for mobile user interfaces and their potential applicability.
Prémont MÉ; Vincent C; Mostafavi MA; Routhier F
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Feb; 15(2):119-131. PubMed ID: 30663444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring the experience of clients with tetraplegia utilizing assistive technology for computer access.
Folan A; Barclay L; Cooper C; Robinson M
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2015 Jan; 10(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 24050283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefits and challenges of using assistive technology in the education and rehabilitation of Individuals with visual impairments.
Alimović S
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 38685705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital personal assistants are smart ways for assistive technology to aid the health and wellbeing of patients and carers.
Balasubramanian GV; Beaney P; Chambers R
BMC Geriatr; 2021 Nov; 21(1):643. PubMed ID: 34781881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assistive technology and active aging according to professionals working in community groups.
Leite ES; Pimenta CJL; Costa MS; Oliveira FB; Moreira MASP; Silva AO
Rev Esc Enferm USP; 2018 Sep; 52():e03355. PubMed ID: 30231117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring Barriers to Implementing Telerehabilitation from experiences of managers, policymakers, and providers of rehabilitation services in Iran: A Qualitative Study.
Rabanifar N; Hoseini MA; Abdi K
Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2022; 36():157. PubMed ID: 36660003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Detecting physical abilities through smartphone sensors: an assistive technology application.
Whittington P; Dogan H; Phalp K; Jiang N
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2022 Nov; 17(8):974-985. PubMed ID: 33258392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cognitive remediation and cognitive assistive technologies in schizophrenia].
Sablier J; Stip E; Franck N
Encephale; 2009 Apr; 35(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 19393385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing virtual reality acceptance in long-term care facilities: a quantitative study with older adults.
Hosseini M; Thomas R; Pilutti L; Fallavollita P; Jutai JW
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Dec; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 38146956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assistive technology and daily living challenges among students with disabilities at University of Gondar, Ethiopia: a qualitative study.
Kibret AK; Yilma TM; Davies TC; Alemayehu Genetu Z; Mekonone ST; Alene BM; Addis BM; Nigussie K; Ayele RG; Mekonnen Araya B
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Jul; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 38949131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A qualitative study of factors influencing ePHR adoption by caregivers and care providers of Alzheimer's patients: An extension of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model.
Amiri P; Pirnejad H; Bahaadinbeigy K; Baghini MS; Khazaee PR; Niazkhani Z
Health Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e1394. PubMed ID: 37425233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
