123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38329868)
1. Multi Degree of Freedom Hybrid FES and Robotic Control of the Upper Limb.
Dunkelberger N; Carlson SA; Berning J; Schearer EM; O'Malley MK
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2024; 32():956-966. PubMed ID: 38329868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hybrid FES-exoskeleton control: Using MPC to distribute actuation for elbow and wrist movements.
Dunkelberger N; Berning J; Schearer EM; O'Malley MK
Front Neurorobot; 2023; 17():1127783. PubMed ID: 37091069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A review of methods for achieving upper limb movement following spinal cord injury through hybrid muscle stimulation and robotic assistance.
Dunkelberger N; Schearer EM; O'Malley MK
Exp Neurol; 2020 Jun; 328():113274. PubMed ID: 32145251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shared Control of Elbow Movements with Functional Electrical Stimulation and Exoskeleton Assistance.
Dunkelberger N; Carlson SA; Berning J; Stovicek KC; Schearer EM; O'Malley MK
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2022 Jul; 2022():1-6. PubMed ID: 36176144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Myoelectric Control Interface for Upper-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury.
McDonald CG; Sullivan JL; Dennis TA; O'Malley MK
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Apr; 28(4):978-987. PubMed ID: 32167899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptive Cooperative Control for Hybrid FES-Robotic Upper Limb Devices: a Simulation Study.
Bardi E; Dalla Gasperina S; Pedrocchi A; Ambrosini E
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():6398-6401. PubMed ID: 34892576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptive hybrid robotic system for rehabilitation of reaching movement after a brain injury: a usability study.
Resquín F; Gonzalez-Vargas J; Ibáñez J; Brunetti F; Dimbwadyo I; Carrasco L; Alves S; Gonzalez-Alted C; Gomez-Blanco A; Pons JL
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Oct; 14(1):104. PubMed ID: 29025427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybrid FES-robot cooperative control of ambulatory gait rehabilitation exoskeleton.
del-Ama AJ; Gil-Agudo A; Pons JL; Moreno JC
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Mar; 11():27. PubMed ID: 24594302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modifying upper-limb inter-joint coordination in healthy subjects by training with a robotic exoskeleton.
Proietti T; Guigon E; Roby-Brami A; Jarrassé N
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 14(1):55. PubMed ID: 28606179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robustness and Tracking Performance Evaluation of PID Motion Control of 7 DoF Anthropomorphic Exoskeleton Robot Assisted Upper Limb Rehabilitation.
Ahmed T; Islam MR; Brahmi B; Rahman MH
Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 35632155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Model-Based Shared Control of a Hybrid FES-Exoskeleton: An Application in Participant-Specific Robotic Rehabilitation.
Kavianirad H; Forouhar M; Sadeghian H; Endo S; Haddadin S; Hirche S
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2023 Sep; 2023():1-6. PubMed ID: 37941166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring Torque Production with a Robotic Exoskeleton during Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation.
Mahan E; Dunkelberger N; Oh J; Simmons M; Varghese B; Sayenko D; O'Malley MK
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2022 Jul; 2022():1-5. PubMed ID: 36176117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low cost exoskeleton manipulator using bidirectional triboelectric sensors enhanced multiple degree of freedom sensory system.
Zhu M; Sun Z; Chen T; Lee C
Nat Commun; 2021 May; 12(1):2692. PubMed ID: 33976216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Model-Based Comparison of Passive and Active Assistance Designs in an Occupational Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Lifting.
Zhou X; Zheng L
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2021; 9(3-4):167-185. PubMed ID: 34254566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A muscle-driven approach to restore stepping with an exoskeleton for individuals with paraplegia.
Chang SR; Nandor MJ; Li L; Kobetic R; Foglyano KM; Schnellenberger JR; Audu ML; Pinault G; Quinn RD; Triolo RJ
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 May; 14(1):48. PubMed ID: 28558835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combining FES and Exoskeletons in a Hybrid Haptic System for Enhancing VR Experience.
de Mongeot LB; Galofaro E; Ramadan F; D'Antonio E; Missiroli F; Lotti N; Casadio M; Masia L
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():4812-4820. PubMed ID: 37971913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Design and kinematical performance analysis of the 7-DOF upper-limb exoskeleton toward improving human-robot interface in active and passive movement training.
Meng Q; Fei C; Jiao Z; Xie Q; Dai Y; Fan Y; Shen Z; Yu H
Technol Health Care; 2022; 30(5):1167-1182. PubMed ID: 35342067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Architectural design and development of an upper-limb rehabilitation device: a modular synthesis approach.
Gupta S; Agrawal A; Singla E
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Jan; 19(1):139-153. PubMed ID: 35549593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive control based on an on-line parameter estimation of an upper limb exoskeleton.
Riani A; Madani T; Hadri AE; Benallegue A
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():695-701. PubMed ID: 28813901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) and robot hybrid system for multi-joint coordinated upper limb rehabilitation after stroke.
Rong W; Li W; Pang M; Hu J; Wei X; Yang B; Wai H; Zheng X; Hu X
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Apr; 14(1):34. PubMed ID: 28446181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
