These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38330339)

  • 1. A novel demonstration of preparation in pop-out search.
    Sclodnick B; Sun H; Milliken B
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2024 Jun; 78(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 38330339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expectations and perceptual priming in a visual search task: Evidence from eye movements and behavior.
    Shurygina O; Kristjánsson Á; Tudge L; Chetverikov A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):489-499. PubMed ID: 30816788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual search for feature singletons: multiple mechanisms produce sequence effects in visual search.
    Rangelov D; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    J Vis; 2013 Aug; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23912066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. False pop out.
    Orsten-Hooge KD; Portillo MC; Pomerantz JR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1623-33. PubMed ID: 26214500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Failure to pop out: Feature singletons do not capture attention under low signal-to-noise ratio conditions.
    Rangelov D; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 May; 146(5):651-671. PubMed ID: 28368190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the contributions of spatial and non-spatial working memory to priming of pop-out.
    Ahn J; Patel TN; Buetti S; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1012-1026. PubMed ID: 28176214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Saccadic repulsion in pop-out search: how a target's dodgy history can push the eyes away from it.
    Caddigan E; Lleras A
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):9. PubMed ID: 21135256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An imagery-induced reversal of intertrial priming in visual search.
    Cochrane BA; Nwabuike AA; Thomson DR; Milliken B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):572-587. PubMed ID: 29094983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection and response bias as determinants of priming of pop-out search: Revelations from diffusion modeling.
    Burnham BR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2389-2397. PubMed ID: 29725950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Top-down then automatic: Instructions can continue to influence visual search when no longer actively implemented.
    Cochrane BA; Pratt J; Milliken B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jan; 85(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 36045313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative contributions of task-relevant and task-irrelevant dimensions in priming of pop-out.
    Michal AL; Lleras A; Beck DM
    J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25311302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Permeability of priming of pop out to expectations.
    Pascucci D; Mastropasqua T; Turatto M
    J Vis; 2012 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 23024358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual target search: Attention tuned to relative features, both within and across feature dimensions.
    York AA; Sewell DK; Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1368-1386. PubMed ID: 32881554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Training top-down attention improves performance on a triple-conjunction search task.
    Baluch F; Itti L
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9127. PubMed ID: 20174622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
    Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Priming of pop-out modulates attentional target selection in visual search: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.
    Eimer M; Kiss M; Cheung T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1353-61. PubMed ID: 19895829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanisms of priming of pop-out: Stored representations or feature-gain modulations?
    Lee H; Mozer MC; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1059-71. PubMed ID: 19525537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.