These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38330672)

  • 21. [Character of refractive errors in population study performed by the Area Military Medical Commission in Lodz].
    Nowak MS; Goś R; Smigielski J
    Klin Oczna; 2008; 110(1-3):55-9. PubMed ID: 18669085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prevalence and predictors of undercorrected refractive errors in the Victorian population.
    Liou HL; McCarty CA; Jin CL; Taylor HR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1999 May; 127(5):590-6. PubMed ID: 10334353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [An investigation on professional performance of optometric refraction in spectacles stores in Anyang city of Henan Province].
    Liang XT; Kang MT; Li SM; Sun YY; Wei SF; Gan JH; Wang NL
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 55(8):576-581. PubMed ID: 31422635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Humphrey Vision Analyzer tm: reliability and validity of refractive-error measures.
    Kratz LD; Flom MC
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1977 Oct; 54(10):653-9. PubMed ID: 605920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Population-based survey of refractive error among school-aged children in rural northern China: the Heilongjiang eye study.
    Li Z; Xu K; Wu S; Lv J; Jin D; Song Z; Wang Z; Liu P
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014; 42(4):379-84. PubMed ID: 23952961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Refractive, biometric and topographic changes among Portuguese university science students: a 3-year longitudinal study.
    Jorge J; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 17470242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Application of big-data for epidemiological studies of refractive error.
    Moore M; Loughman J; Butler JS; Ohlendorf A; Wahl S; Flitcroft DI
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250468. PubMed ID: 33891638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of cycloplegia on the determination of refractive error by the Ophthalmetron.
    Keech PM
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1979 Apr; 56(4):228-30. PubMed ID: 517624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Standardized patient methodology to assess refractive error reproducibility.
    Shah R; Edgar DF; Rabbetts R; Harle DE; Evans BJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 May; 86(5):517-28. PubMed ID: 19319010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using electronic medical record data to establish and monitor the distribution of refractive errors
    Longwill S; Moore M; Flitcroft DI; Loughman J
    J Optom; 2022; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S32-S42. PubMed ID: 36220741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The prevalence of refractive and ocular anomalies among 1242 institutionalized mentally retarded persons.
    Woodruff ME; Cleary TE; Bader D
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1980 Feb; 57(2):70-84. PubMed ID: 7377284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exploring the optometric application of expert computer systems: refractive error correction.
    Madsen EM; Reinke AR; Rehrs MH; Yolton RL
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Aug; 62(8):621-9. PubMed ID: 1813572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the new self-contained darkroom refractive screener versus table-top autorefractor and cycloplegia retinoscopy in detecting refractive error.
    Wei X; Li L; Jiang L; Lu H; Huang H; Zhong D; Pan L; Wei D; Han Y; Lin H; Chen Q
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):487. PubMed ID: 38012552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prevalence, associations and characteristics of severe uncorrected refractive error in the Australian National Eye Health Survey.
    Keel S; McGuinness MB; Foreman J; Scheetz J; Taylor HR; Dirani M
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 31574581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prevalence of habitual refractive errors and anisometropia among Dutch schoolchildren and hospital employees.
    Hendricks TJ; de Brabander J; Vankan-Hendricks MH; van der Horst FG; Hendrikse F; Knottnerus JA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 87(5):538-43. PubMed ID: 19416112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Refractive errors as causes of visual impairment in children from public schools of the Botucatu region - SP].
    Oliveira CA; Hisatomi KS; Leite CP; Schellini SA; Padovani CR; Padovani CR
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19466328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prevalence of uncorrected refractive errors among school-age children in the School District of Philadelphia.
    Mayro EL; Hark LA; Shiuey E; Pond M; Siam L; Hill-Bennett T; Tran J; Khanna N; Silverstein M; Donaghy J; Zhan T; Murchison AP; Levin AV
    J AAPOS; 2018 Jun; 22(3):214-217.e2. PubMed ID: 29660392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Refractive errors in children: analysis among preschool and school children in Tuzla city, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
    Nadarević Vodenčarević A; Halilbašić M; Međedović A; Jusufović V; Pilavdžić A; Drljević A; Burgić M
    Med Glas (Zenica); 2021 Feb; 18(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 32815670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Routine optometric care in nursing homes: a retrospective study.
    Goetzinger GJ; Wingert TA; McAlister WH
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Apr; 73(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 8728491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. School vision screening, ages 5-16 years: the evidence-base for content, provision and efficacy.
    Logan NS; Gilmartin B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):481-92. PubMed ID: 15491475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.