120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38330735)
1. The influence of femoral lytic tumors segmentation on autonomous finite element analysis.
Rachmil O; Myers K; Merose O; Sternheim A; Yosibash Z
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2024 Feb; 112():106192. PubMed ID: 38330735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of deep learning-based lesion segmentation on failure load calculations of metastatic femurs using finite element analysis.
Ataei A; Eggermont F; Verdonschot N; Lessmann N; Tanck E
Bone; 2024 Feb; 179():116987. PubMed ID: 38061504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modification to Mirels scoring system location component improves fracture prediction for metastatic disease of the proximal femur.
Amendola RL; Miller MA; Kaupp SM; Cleary RJ; Damron TA; Mann KA
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Jan; 24(1):65. PubMed ID: 36694156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finite element analysis and CT-based structural rigidity analysis to assess failure load in bones with simulated lytic defects.
Anez-Bustillos L; Derikx LC; Verdonschot N; Calderon N; Zurakowski D; Snyder BD; Nazarian A; Tanck E
Bone; 2014 Jan; 58():160-7. PubMed ID: 24145305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathological fracture risk assessment in patients with femoral metastases using CT-based finite element methods. A retrospective clinical study.
Sternheim A; Giladi O; Gortzak Y; Drexler M; Salai M; Trabelsi N; Milgrom C; Yosibash Z
Bone; 2018 May; 110():215-220. PubMed ID: 29475110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image-based anatomical reconstruction and pharmaco-mediated bone remodeling model applied to a femur with subtrochanteric fracture: A subject-specific finite element study.
Bahia MT; Hecke MB; Mercuri EGF
Med Eng Phys; 2019 Jul; 69():58-71. PubMed ID: 31171487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated segmentation of cortical and trabecular bone to generate finite element models for femoral bone mechanics.
Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Venäläinen MS; Matikka H; Zheng Y; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Med Eng Phys; 2019 Aug; 70():19-28. PubMed ID: 31280927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the influence of computed tomography's slice thickness on computer tomography based finite element analyses results.
Eliyahu L; Yosibash Z; Avivi I; Cohen YC; Ariel G; Sadovnic O; Sternheim A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 Feb; 102():105889. PubMed ID: 36774735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Location of atypical femoral fracture can be determined by tensile stress distribution influenced by femoral bowing and neck-shaft angle: a CT-based nonlinear finite element analysis model for the assessment of femoral shaft loading stress.
Oh Y; Fujita K; Wakabayashi Y; Kurosa Y; Okawa A
Injury; 2017 Dec; 48(12):2736-2743. PubMed ID: 28982480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subject specific finite element modelling of periprosthetic femoral fractures in different load cases.
Hennicke NS; Saemann M; Kluess D; Bader R; Sander M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():105059. PubMed ID: 34995835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In situ parameter identification of optimal density-elastic modulus relationships in subject-specific finite element models of the proximal femur.
Cong A; Buijs JO; Dragomir-Daescu D
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Mar; 33(2):164-73. PubMed ID: 21030287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fully automatic segmentation of femurs with medullary canal definition in high and in low resolution CT scans.
Almeida DF; Ruben RB; Folgado J; Fernandes PR; Audenaert E; Verhegghe B; De Beule M
Med Eng Phys; 2016 Dec; 38(12):1474-1480. PubMed ID: 27751655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interactive graph-cut segmentation for fast creation of finite element models from clinical ct data for hip fracture prediction.
Pauchard Y; Fitze T; Browarnik D; Eskandari A; Pauchard I; Enns-Bray W; Pálsson H; Sigurdsson S; Ferguson SJ; Harris TB; Gudnason V; Helgason B
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016 Dec; 19(16):1693-1703. PubMed ID: 27161828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Potential bone fragility of mid-shaft atypical femoral fracture: Biomechanical analysis by a CT-based nonlinear finite element method.
Tano A; Oh Y; Fukushima K; Kurosa Y; Wakabayashi Y; Fujita K; Yoshii T; Okawa A
Injury; 2019 Nov; 50(11):1876-1882. PubMed ID: 31519437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical Gains Associated With Virtual Prophylactic Intramedullary Nail Fixation in Femurs With Metastatic Disease.
Johnson JE; Figueroa AV; Brouillette MJ; Miller BJ; Goetz JE
Iowa Orthop J; 2023 Dec; 43(2):70-78. PubMed ID: 38213856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The risk assessment of pathological fracture in the proximal femur using a CT-based finite element method.
Kawabata Y; Matsuo K; Nezu Y; Kamiishi T; Inaba Y; Saito T
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Sep; 22(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28688810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hip Fracture Risk Assessment in Elderly and Diabetic Patients: Combining Autonomous Finite Element Analysis and Machine Learning.
Yosibash Z; Trabelsi N; Buchnik I; Myers KW; Salai M; Eshed I; Barash Y; Klang E; Tripto-Shkolnik L
J Bone Miner Res; 2023 Jun; 38(6):876-886. PubMed ID: 36970838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validated finite element models of the proximal femur using two-dimensional projected geometry and bone density.
Op Den Buijs J; Dragomir-Daescu D
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Nov; 104(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 21159405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental validation of finite element model for proximal composite femur using optical measurements.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Amin Yavari S; Weinans H; Jurvelin JS; Zadpoor AA; Isaksson H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 May; 21():86-94. PubMed ID: 23510970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association of atypical femoral fracture location and lower limb mechanical axis: a computed tomography-based finite element analysis.
Hwang D; Kim CH; Lee Y; Kim JW
Osteoporos Int; 2022 Jun; 33(6):1285-1293. PubMed ID: 35112136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
