121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38331250)
1. Correlation between pre-radical prostatectomy standardized SUVmax ratios detected on 68Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT and final histopathology outcomes: an in-depth analysis.
Arıkan MG; Soyluoğlu S; Korkmaz Ü; Taştekin E; Elboğa U; Arda E
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2024; 43(2):100-106. PubMed ID: 38331250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which Patients with Prostate Cancer and Lymph Node Uptake at Preoperative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography Scan Are at a Higher Risk of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy? Identifying Indicators of Systemic Disease by Integrating Clinical, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Functional Imaging Parameters.
Mazzone E; Gandaglia G; Robesti D; Rajwa P; Gomez Rivas J; Ibáñez L; Soeterik TFW; Bianchi L; Afferi L; Kesch C; Darr C; Guo H; Zhuang J; Zattoni F; Fendler WP; Amparore D; Huebner NA; Giesen A; Joniau S; Schiavina R; Brunocilla E; Mattei A; Dal Moro F; Moreno Sierra J; Porpiglia F; Picchio M; Chiti A; van den Bergh R; Shariat SF; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Apr; 7(2):231-240. PubMed ID: 37689506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical utility of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in initial staging of patients with prostate cancer and importance of intraprostatic SUVmax values.
Rogic I; Golubic AT; Zuvic M; Smitran T; Jukic N; Gamulin M; Kastelan Z; Huic D
Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2024; 27(0):6-12. PubMed ID: 38680016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mp-MRI in regard to local staging for prostate cancer with histopathological results: A retrospective study.
Ucar T; Gunduz N; Demirci E; Culpan M; Gunel H; Kir G; Atis RG; Yildirim A
Prostate; 2022 Nov; 82(15):1462-1468. PubMed ID: 35915579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lymph node staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer suitable for radical prostatectomy managed in a prostate cancer unit.
Maestroni UV; Campobasso D; Guarino G; Acampora A; Scarlattei M; Ziglioli F; Dinale F; Baldari G; Migliari S; Gasparro D; Ferretti S; Silini EM; Ruffini L
Chin Clin Oncol; 2023 Jun; 12(3):22. PubMed ID: 37417288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Role of 68GA-PSMA PET/CT Scan In Patients with Prostate Adenocarcinoma who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy.
Gultekin MH; Demirci E; Turegun FA; Kabasakal L; Sahin OE; Ocak M; Onal B; Erozenci A
Urol J; 2020 Dec; 18(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 33349912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardised uptake values as determined on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography is associated with oncological outcomes in patients with prostate cancer.
Bodar YJL; Veerman H; Meijer D; de Bie K; van Leeuwen PJ; Donswijk ML; van Moorselaar RJA; Hendrikse NH; Boellaard R; Oprea-Lager DE; Vis AN
BJU Int; 2022 Jun; 129(6):768-776. PubMed ID: 35166426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of PSMA PET/CT to predict upgrading in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for ISUP grade group 1 prostate cancer.
Esen B; Seymen H; Gurses B; Armutlu A; Koseoglu E; Tarim K; Ertoy Baydar D; Sarikaya AF; Canda AE; Balbay D; Kordan Y; Tilki D; Esen T; Demirkol MO
Prostate; 2024 Jan; 84(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 37661579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11.
Klingenberg S; Jochumsen MR; Ulhøi BP; Fredsøe J; Sørensen KD; Borre M; Bouchelouche K
J Nucl Med; 2021 Feb; 62(2):214-220. PubMed ID: 32444374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlations of
Topuz ÖV; Aksu A; Erinç SR; Tamam MÖ
Hell J Nucl Med; 2021; 24(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33866340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of
Scheltema MJ; Chang JI; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Nguyen QA; Ho B; Delprado W; Lee J; Thompson JE; Cusick T; Spriensma AS; Siriwardana AR; Yuen C; Kooner R; Hruby G; O'Neill G; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124 Suppl 1():42-49. PubMed ID: 31287613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is there a nonnegligible effect of maximum standardized uptake value in the staging and management of prostate cancer with 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography imaging? A single-center experience.
Ekmekcioglu O; Yavuzsan AH; Arican P; Kirecci SL
J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(6):1351-1357. PubMed ID: 34916365
[TBL] [Abstract]
