These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38331648)
1. Evaluation of ground reaction forces and centers of pressure predicted by AnyBody Modeling System during load reaching/handling activities and effects of the prediction errors on model-estimated spinal loads. Daroudi S; Arjmand N; Mohseni M; El-Rich M; Parnianpour M J Biomech; 2024 Feb; 164():111974. PubMed ID: 38331648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An artificial neural network for full-body posture prediction in dynamic lifting activities and effects of its prediction errors on model-estimated spinal loads. Hosseini N; Arjmand N J Biomech; 2024 Jan; 162():111896. PubMed ID: 38072705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex-Dependent Estimation of Spinal Loads During Static Manual Material Handling Activities-Combined Firouzabadi A; Arjmand N; Pan F; Zander T; Schmidt H Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():750862. PubMed ID: 34796167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical Assessment of the NIOSH Lifting Equation in Asymmetric Load-Handling Activities Using a Detailed Musculoskeletal Model. Behjati M; Arjmand N Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 30222936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marker-less versus marker-based driven musculoskeletal models of the spine during static load-handling activities. Asadi F; Arjmand N J Biomech; 2020 Nov; 112():110043. PubMed ID: 32950760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of obesity on spinal loads during load-reaching activities: A subject- and kinematics-specific musculoskeletal modeling approach. Bahramian M; Arjmand N; El-Rich M; Parnianpour M J Biomech; 2023 Dec; 161():111770. PubMed ID: 37633816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the AnyBody full body musculoskeletal model in computing lumbar spine loads at L4L5 level. Bassani T; Stucovitz E; Qian Z; Briguglio M; Galbusera F J Biomech; 2017 Jun; 58():89-96. PubMed ID: 28521951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamically adjustable foot-ground contact model to estimate ground reaction force during walking and running. Jung Y; Jung M; Ryu J; Yoon S; Park SK; Koo S Gait Posture; 2016 Mar; 45():62-8. PubMed ID: 26979885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of predicted kinetic variables between Parkinson's disease patients and healthy age-matched control using a depth sensor-driven full-body musculoskeletal model. Oh J; Eltoukhy M; Kuenze C; Andersen MS; Signorile JF Gait Posture; 2020 Feb; 76():151-156. PubMed ID: 31862662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Weight Generates Different Spine Loads in Load-Handling Activity Performed Using Stoop, Semi-squat and Full-Squat Techniques; a Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model Study. Dehghan P; Arjmand N Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1387-1398. PubMed ID: 36433743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting. Arjmand N; Ekrami O; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Parnianpour M J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(8):1454-62. PubMed ID: 23541615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial neural networks to predict 3D spinal posture in reaching and lifting activities; Applications in biomechanical models. Gholipour A; Arjmand N J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2946-2952. PubMed ID: 27452877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Concurrent prediction of ground reaction forces and moments and tibiofemoral contact forces during walking using musculoskeletal modelling. Peng Y; Zhang Z; Gao Y; Chen Z; Xin H; Zhang Q; Fan X; Jin Z Med Eng Phys; 2018 Feb; 52():31-40. PubMed ID: 29269224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coupled artificial neural networks to estimate 3D whole-body posture, lumbosacral moments, and spinal loads during load-handling activities. Aghazadeh F; Arjmand N; Nasrabadi AM J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109332. PubMed ID: 31540822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of different lifting analysis tools in estimating lower spinal loads - Evaluation of NIOSH criterion. Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Arjmand N J Biomech; 2020 Nov; 112():110024. PubMed ID: 32961423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of ground reaction forces during stair climbing in patients with ACL reconstruction using a depth sensor-driven musculoskeletal model. Oh J; Kuenze C; Signorile JF; Andersen MS; Letter M; Best TM; Ripic Z; Emerson C; Eltoukhy M Gait Posture; 2021 Feb; 84():232-237. PubMed ID: 33383533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Lower limb joint contact forces and ground reaction forces analysis based on Azure Kinect motion capture]. Peng Y; Wang L; Chen Z; Dang X; Chen F; Li G Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Aug; 41(4):751-757. PubMed ID: 39218601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subject-specific regression equations to estimate lower spinal loads during symmetric and asymmetric static lifting. Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; El Ouaaid Z; Plamondon A; Arjmand N J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109550. PubMed ID: 31932024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ground reaction force estimation using an insole-type pressure mat and joint kinematics during walking. Jung Y; Jung M; Lee K; Koo S J Biomech; 2014 Aug; 47(11):2693-9. PubMed ID: 24917473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of six quantitative lifting tools to estimate spine loads during static activities. Rajaee MA; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Schmidt H Appl Ergon; 2015 May; 48():22-32. PubMed ID: 25683528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]