These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38333555)

  • 1. Genetic parameters and genomic prediction of growth and breast morphological traits in a crossbreed duck population.
    Cai W; Hu J; Fan W; Xu Y; Tang J; Xie M; Zhang Y; Guo Z; Zhou Z; Hou S
    Evol Appl; 2024 Feb; 17(2):e13638. PubMed ID: 38333555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strategies to improve genomic predictions for 35 duck carcass traits in an F
    Cai W; Hu J; Fan W; Xu Y; Tang J; Xie M; Zhang Y; Guo Z; Zhou Z; Hou S
    J Anim Sci Biotechnol; 2023 May; 14(1):74. PubMed ID: 37147656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Different Single-Step Strategies to Improve the Efficiency of Genomic Prediction on Body Measurement Traits in Pig.
    Song H; Zhang J; Zhang Q; Ding X
    Front Genet; 2018; 9():730. PubMed ID: 30693018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Genomic Selection for Agricultural Economic Traits in Maize, Cattle, and Pig Populations.
    Zhang H; Yin L; Wang M; Yuan X; Liu X
    Front Genet; 2019; 10():189. PubMed ID: 30923535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-step genomic evaluation for growth traits in a Mexican Braunvieh cattle population.
    Valerio-Hernández JE; Ruíz-Flores A; Nilforooshan MA; Pérez-Rodríguez P
    Anim Biosci; 2023 Jul; 36(7):1003-1009. PubMed ID: 36915917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic selection for meat quality traits in Pekin duck.
    Zhang F; Zhu F; Yang FX; Hao JP; Hou ZC
    Anim Genet; 2022 Feb; 53(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 34841553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategies to improve the accuracy and reduce costs of genomic prediction in aquaculture species.
    Song H; Hu H
    Evol Appl; 2022 Apr; 15(4):578-590. PubMed ID: 35505889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic studies with preselected markers reveal dominance effects influencing growth traits in Eucalyptus nitens.
    Thumma BR; Joyce KR; Jacobs A
    G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 34791210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of marker density and population structure on the genomic prediction accuracy for growth trait in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei.
    Wang Q; Yu Y; Yuan J; Zhang X; Huang H; Li F; Xiang J
    BMC Genet; 2017 May; 18(1):45. PubMed ID: 28514941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of pedigree and genomic predictions of carcass and novel meat quality traits in multi-breed sheep data assessed by cross-validation.
    Daetwyler HD; Swan AA; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Nov; 44(1):33. PubMed ID: 23146144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic Predictions in Korean Hanwoo Cows: A Comparative Analysis of Genomic BLUP and Bayesian Methods for Reproductive Traits.
    Haque MA; Lee YM; Ha JJ; Jin S; Park B; Kim NY; Won JI; Kim JJ
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38200758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genome-wide association study and prediction of genomic breeding values for fatty-acid composition in Korean Hanwoo cattle using a high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism array.
    Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Kim HJ; Lee DH; Lee SH; Yoon HB; Lee SH
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4063-4075. PubMed ID: 30265318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic prediction in an admixed population of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Odegård J; Moen T; Santi N; Korsvoll SA; Kjøglum S; Meuwissen TH
    Front Genet; 2014; 5():402. PubMed ID: 25484890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic Prediction Accuracies for Growth and Carcass Traits in a Brangus Heifer Population.
    Peters SO; Kızılkaya K; Sinecen M; Mestav B; Thiruvenkadan AK; Thomas MG
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Apr; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37048528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Opportunities for genomic selection in American mink: A simulation study.
    Karimi K; Sargolzaei M; Plastow GS; Wang Z; Miar Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213873. PubMed ID: 30870528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving genomic prediction of growth and wood traits in Eucalyptus using phenotypes from non-genotyped trees by single-step GBLUP.
    Cappa EP; de Lima BM; da Silva-Junior OB; Garcia CC; Mansfield SD; Grattapaglia D
    Plant Sci; 2019 Jul; 284():9-15. PubMed ID: 31084883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.