130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38334793)
1. Increasing auditory intensity enhances temporal but deteriorates spatial accuracy in a virtual interception task.
Tolentino-Castro JW; Schroeger A; Cañal-Bruland R; Raab M
Exp Brain Res; 2024 Apr; 242(4):937-947. PubMed ID: 38334793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Impact of Pitch on Tempo-Spatial Accuracy and Precision in Intercepting a Virtually Moving Ball.
Tolentino-Castro JW; Schroeger A; Cañal-Bruland R; Raab M
J Mot Behav; 2022; 54(2):158-172. PubMed ID: 34180782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of visual blur and contrast on spatial and temporal precision in manual interception.
Schroeger A; Tolentino-Castro JW; Raab M; Cañal-Bruland R
Exp Brain Res; 2021 Nov; 239(11):3343-3358. PubMed ID: 34480594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tau and kappa in interception - how perceptual spatiotemporal interrelations affect movements.
Schroeger A; Raab M; Cañal-Bruland R
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):1925-1943. PubMed ID: 35705842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adapting to altered auditory cues: Generalization from manual reaching to head pointing.
Valzolgher C; Todeschini M; Verdelet G; Gatel J; Salemme R; Gaveau V; Truy E; Farnè A; Pavani F
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0263509. PubMed ID: 35421095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli.
Shafiro V
Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):775-90. PubMed ID: 18596641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory capture of visual apparent motion, both laterally and looming.
McBeath MK; Addie JD; Krynen RC
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():105-112. PubMed ID: 30602130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intercepting virtual balls approaching under different gravity conditions: evidence for spatial prediction.
Russo M; Cesqui B; La Scaleia B; Ceccarelli F; Maselli A; Moscatelli A; Zago M; Lacquaniti F; d'Avella A
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Oct; 118(4):2421-2434. PubMed ID: 28768737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Playing 'Pong' Together: Emergent Coordination in a Doubles Interception Task.
Benerink NH; Zaal FT; Casanova R; Bonnardel N; Bootsma RJ
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1910. PubMed ID: 27999557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution.
Shafiro V
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):401-20. PubMed ID: 18344871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hearing water temperature: Characterizing the development of nuanced perception of sound sources.
Agrawal T; Schachner A
Dev Sci; 2023 May; 26(3):e13321. PubMed ID: 36068928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stimulus intensity affects early sensory processing: sound intensity modulates auditory evoked gamma-band activity in human EEG.
Schadow J; Lenz D; Thaerig S; Busch NA; Fründ I; Herrmann CS
Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 17531341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Superior side sound localisation performance in a full-chassis driving simulator.
Achtemeier JD; Craig CM; Morris NL; Davis B
Ergonomics; 2020 May; 63(5):538-547. PubMed ID: 32149581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. No sound is more distracting than the one you're trying not to hear: delayed costs of mental control of task-irrelevant neutral and emotional sounds.
Kolbeinsson Ö; Asutay E; Enström M; Sand J; Hesser H
BMC Psychol; 2022 Feb; 10(1):33. PubMed ID: 35189964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Task-irrelevant sounds influence both temporal order and apparent-motion judgments about tactile stimuli applied to crossed and uncrossed hands.
Badde S; Röder B; Bruns P
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):773-783. PubMed ID: 29282652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Active Sound Localization Sharpens Spatial Tuning in Human Primary Auditory Cortex.
van der Heijden K; Rauschecker JP; Formisano E; Valente G; de Gelder B
J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(40):8574-8587. PubMed ID: 30126968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical test performance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions using new stimulus conditions.
Johnson TA; Neely ST; Kopun JG; Dierking DM; Tan H; Gorga MP
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 19701088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective control in catching: the persistent Angle-of-approach effect in lateral interception.
Ledouit S; Casanova R; Zaal FT; Bootsma RJ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80827. PubMed ID: 24278324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differing Bilateral Benefits for Spatial Release From Masking and Sound Localization Accuracy Using Bone Conduction Devices.
Denanto FM; Wales J; Tideholm B; Asp F
Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1708-1720. PubMed ID: 35588503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of virtual speaker density and room reverberation on spatiotemporal thresholds of audio-visual motion coherence.
Sankaran N; Leung J; Carlile S
PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108437. PubMed ID: 25269061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
