These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38334809)

  • 1. A multi-label transformer-based deep learning approach to predict focal visual field progression.
    Chen L; Tseng VS; Tsung TH; Lu DW
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2024 Jul; 262(7):2227-2235. PubMed ID: 38334809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of Visual Field Progression with Baseline and Longitudinal Structural Measurements Using Deep Learning.
    Mohammadzadeh V; Wu S; Besharati S; Davis T; Vepa A; Morales E; Edalati K; Rafiee M; Martinyan A; Zhang D; Scalzo F; Caprioli J; Nouri-Mahdavi K
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2024 Jun; 262():141-152. PubMed ID: 38354971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of visual field progression with serial optic disc photographs using deep learning.
    Mohammadzadeh V; Wu S; Davis T; Vepa A; Morales E; Besharati S; Edalati K; Martinyan J; Rafiee M; Martynian A; Scalzo F; Caprioli J; Nouri-Mahdavi K
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 Jul; 108(8):1107-1113. PubMed ID: 37833037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing Glaucoma Progression Using Machine Learning Trained on Longitudinal Visual Field and Clinical Data.
    Dixit A; Yohannan J; Boland MV
    Ophthalmology; 2021 Jul; 128(7):1016-1026. PubMed ID: 33359887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reversal of Glaucoma Hemifield Test Results and Visual Field Features in Glaucoma.
    Wang M; Pasquale LR; Shen LQ; Boland MV; Wellik SR; De Moraes CG; Myers JS; Wang H; Baniasadi N; Li D; Silva RNE; Bex PJ; Elze T
    Ophthalmology; 2018 Mar; 125(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 29103791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Opportunities for Improving Glaucoma Clinical Trials via Deep Learning-Based Identification of Patients with Low Visual Field Variability.
    Wang R; Bradley C; Herbert P; Hou K; Hager GD; Breininger K; Unberath M; Ramulu P; Yohannan J
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2024; 7(3):222-231. PubMed ID: 38296108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting rates of visual field progression in glaucoma patients with optic disc hemorrhage.
    Prata TS; De Moraes CG; Teng CC; Tello C; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 19896197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transformer-Based Deep Learning Prediction of 10-Degree Humphrey Visual Field Tests From 24-Degree Data.
    Shi M; Lokhande A; Tian Y; Luo Y; Eslami M; Kazeminasab S; Elze T; Shen LQ; Pasquale LR; Wellik SR; De Moraes CG; Myers JS; Zebardast N; Friedman DS; Boland MV; Wang M
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 Aug; 13(8):11. PubMed ID: 39110574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting eyes at risk for rapid glaucoma progression based on an initial visual field test using machine learning.
    Shuldiner SR; Boland MV; Ramulu PY; De Moraes CG; Elze T; Myers J; Pasquale L; Wellik S; Yohannan J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249856. PubMed ID: 33861775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deep Learning Approaches Predict Glaucomatous Visual Field Damage from OCT Optic Nerve Head En Face Images and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps.
    Christopher M; Bowd C; Belghith A; Goldbaum MH; Weinreb RN; Fazio MA; Girkin CA; Liebmann JM; Zangwill LM
    Ophthalmology; 2020 Mar; 127(3):346-356. PubMed ID: 31718841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing glaucoma progression on 24-2 and 10-2 visual field examinations.
    Rao HL; Begum VU; Khadka D; Mandal AK; Senthil S; Garudadri CS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0127233. PubMed ID: 25978316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting Visual Field Worsening with Longitudinal OCT Data Using a Gated Transformer Network.
    Hou K; Bradley C; Herbert P; Johnson C; Wall M; Ramulu PY; Unberath M; Yohannan J
    Ophthalmology; 2023 Aug; 130(8):854-862. PubMed ID: 37003520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of focal lamina cribrosa defect on glaucomatous visual field progression.
    Faridi OS; Park SC; Kabadi R; Su D; De Moraes CG; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1524-30. PubMed ID: 24697910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forecasting Risk of Future Rapid Glaucoma Worsening Using Early Visual Field, OCT, and Clinical Data.
    Herbert P; Hou K; Bradley C; Hager G; Boland MV; Ramulu P; Unberath M; Yohannan J
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(5):466-473. PubMed ID: 36944385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parapapillary Deep-Layer Microvasculature Dropout and Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma.
    Kwon JM; Weinreb RN; Zangwill LM; Suh MH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 200():65-75. PubMed ID: 30578786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Progression of patterns (POP): a machine classifier algorithm to identify glaucoma progression in visual fields.
    Goldbaum MH; Lee I; Jang G; Balasubramanian M; Sample PA; Weinreb RN; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA; Anderson DR; Zangwill LM; Fredette MJ; Jung TP; Medeiros FA; Bowd C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 53(10):6557-67. PubMed ID: 22786913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Many Visual Fields Are Required to Precisely Predict Future Test Results in Glaucoma Patients When Using Different Trend Analyses?
    Taketani Y; Murata H; Fujino Y; Mayama C; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jun; 56(6):4076-82. PubMed ID: 26114484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting Glaucoma Progression Using Guided Progression Analysis with OCT and Visual Field Assessment in Eyes Classified by International Classification of Disease Severity Codes.
    Nguyen AT; Greenfield DS; Bhakta AS; Lee J; Feuer WJ
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2019; 2(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 32672556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Central Visual Field Defects in Patients with Distinct Glaucomatous Optic Disc Phenotypes.
    Ekici E; Moghimi S; Hou H; Proudfoot J; Zangwill LM; Do JL; Oh WH; Kamalipour A; Liebmann JM; De Moraes CG; Girkin CA; El-Nimri N; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Mar; 223():229-240. PubMed ID: 33129812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applying "Lasso" Regression to Predict Future Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Patients.
    Fujino Y; Murata H; Mayama C; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 56(4):2334-9. PubMed ID: 25698708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.