These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38335320)

  • 1. Miettinen and Nurminen score statistics revisited.
    Martín Andrés A; Gayá Moreno F; Álvarez Hernández M; Herranz Tejedor I
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Feb; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 38335320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple imputation analysis of Miettinen-Nurminen interval for difference in proportions.
    Lu K; Guo H
    Pharm Stat; 2022 Jan; 21(1):196-208. PubMed ID: 34390131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementation of Miettinen-Nurminen score method with or without stratification in R.
    Lee MH; Bae KS
    Transl Clin Pharmacol; 2022 Sep; 30(3):155-162. PubMed ID: 36247746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Approximate interval estimation of the ratio of binomial parameters: a review and corrections for skewness.
    Gart JJ; Nam J
    Biometrics; 1988 Jun; 44(2):323-38. PubMed ID: 3291957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
    Gu X; Lee JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A quasi-exact method for the confidence intervals of the difference of two independent binomial proportions in small sample cases.
    Chen X
    Stat Med; 2002 Mar; 21(6):943-56. PubMed ID: 11870826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A class of two-sample nonparametric statistics for binary and time-to-event outcomes.
    Bofill Roig M; Gómez Melis G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Feb; 31(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 34870495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods.
    Newcombe RG
    Stat Med; 1998 Apr; 17(8):873-90. PubMed ID: 9595617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One-tailed asymptotic inferences for the difference of proportions: Analysis of 97 methods of inference.
    Hernández MÁ; Andrés AM; Tejedor IH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1090-1104. PubMed ID: 29608389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-tailed asymptotic inferences for the odds ratio in cross-sectional studies: evaluation of fifteen old and new methods of inference.
    Andrés AM; García JMT; Moreno FG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 30(5):900-915. PubMed ID: 32419581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tests for 2 x K contingency tables with clustered ordered categorical data.
    Jung SH; Kang SH
    Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(5):785-94. PubMed ID: 11241576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unconditional inferences on the difference of two proportions in cross-sectional studies.
    Martín Andrés A; Tapia García JM; Del Moral Avila MJ
    Biom J; 2005 Apr; 47(2):177-87. PubMed ID: 16389914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confidence interval of risk difference by different statistical methods and its impact on the study conclusion in antibiotic non-inferiority trials.
    Bai AD; Komorowski AS; Lo CKL; Tandon P; Li XX; Mokashi V; Cvetkovic A; Findlater A; Liang L; Tomlinson G; Loeb M; Mertz D;
    Trials; 2021 Oct; 22(1):708. PubMed ID: 34656155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust Test Statistics Based on Restricted Minimum Rényi's Pseudodistance Estimators.
    Jaenada M; Miranda P; Pardo L
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Apr; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 35626501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of exposure-specific risks from two independent samples: a simulation study.
    Reichmann WM; Gagnon D; Horsburgh CR; Losina E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Jan; 11():1. PubMed ID: 21208427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Longitudinal analysis of arterial Doppler parameters in growth retarded fetuses].
    Miković Z; Mandić V; Djukić M; Egić A; Filimonović D; Cerović N; Popovac M
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2003; 131(1-2):21-5. PubMed ID: 14608857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpretation and estimation of summary ratios under heterogeneity.
    Greenland S
    Stat Med; 1982; 1(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 7187095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Equal-tailed confidence intervals for comparison of rates.
    Laud PJ
    Pharm Stat; 2017 Sep; 16(5):334-348. PubMed ID: 28639426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Authors' response: Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.
    Reuter M; Rigó M; Formazin M; Liebers F; Latza U; Castell S; Jöckel KH; Greiser KH; Michels KB; Krause G; Albrecht S; Öztürk I; Kuss O; Berger K; Lampl BMJ; Leitzmann M; Zeeb H; Starke KR; Schipf S; Meinke-Franze C; Ahrens W; Seidler A; Klee B; Pischon T; Andreas Deckert AD; Schmidt B; Mikolajczyk R; Karch A; Bohn B; Brenner H; Holleczek B; Dragano N
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2022 Sep; 48(7):588-590. PubMed ID: 36153787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.