These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38335411)

  • 1. Accreditation of the handheld 3-dimensional scanner and conventional photo images for area measurement.
    Chang CW; Hsieh MC; Lin IW; Chen RF; Kuo YR; Lee SS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Feb; 103(6):e35376. PubMed ID: 38335411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ways to increase precision and accuracy of wound area measurement using smart devices: Advanced app Planimator.
    Foltynski P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0192485. PubMed ID: 29505569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of accuracy of photogrammetry with 3D scanning and conventional impression method for craniomaxillofacial defects using a software analysis.
    Beri A; Pisulkar SK; Bagde AD; Bansod A; Dahihandekar C; Paikrao B
    Trials; 2022 Dec; 23(1):1048. PubMed ID: 36575547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing photogrammetry-based techniques for three-dimensional surface documentation in forensic pathology.
    Urbanová P; Hejna P; Jurda M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 May; 250():77-86. PubMed ID: 25818581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of three-dimensional facial imaging captured with smartphone-based photogrammetry application in comparison to stereophotogrammetry system.
    Andrews J; Alwafi A; Bichu YM; Pliska BT; Mostafa N; Zou B
    Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e15834. PubMed ID: 37180897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chairside virtual patient protocol. Part 1: Free vs Guided face scan protocol.
    Raffone C; Gianfreda F; Bollero P; Pompeo MG; Miele G; Canullo L
    J Dent; 2022 Jan; 116():103881. PubMed ID: 34762986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of RGB-D camera-based and stereophotogrammetric facial scanners: a comparative study.
    Pan F; Liu J; Cen Y; Chen Y; Cai R; Zhao Z; Liao W; Wang J
    J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104302. PubMed ID: 36152954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new neuroanatomical two-dimensional fitting three-dimensional imaging techniques in neuroanatomy education.
    Shao X; Qiang D; Yuan Q
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 May; 23(1):333. PubMed ID: 37179320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and precision of the three-dimensional assessment of the facial surface using a 3-D laser scanner.
    Kovacs L; Zimmermann A; Brockmann G; Baurecht H; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Papadopoulos MA; Sader R; Biemer E; Zeilhofer HF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Jun; 25(6):742-54. PubMed ID: 16768239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of two handheld devices against a non-portable three-dimensional surface scanner and assessment of potential use for intraoperative facial imaging.
    Koban KC; Perko P; Etzel L; Li Z; Schenck TL; Giunta RE
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Jan; 73(1):141-148. PubMed ID: 31519501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Facial Scan for Facial Deformities in Clinics: A New Evaluation Method for Facial Scanner Accuracy.
    Zhao YJ; Xiong YX; Wang Y
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169402. PubMed ID: 28056044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the accuracy of different handheld-type scanners in three-dimensional facial image recognition.
    Tsuchida Y; Shiozawa M; Handa K; Takahashi H; Nikawa H
    J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Apr; 67(2):222-230. PubMed ID: 35768278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Smartphone Application as a Low-Cost Alternative for Digitizing Facial Defects: Is It Accurate Enough for Clinical Application?
    Elbashti ME; Sumita YI; Aswehlee AM; Seelaus R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(6):541-543. PubMed ID: 31664272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement accuracy of 3-Dimensional mapping technologies versus standard goniometry for angle assessment.
    Siapno AED; Yi BC; Daniels D; Bolagani A; Kwan L; Walker D; Aninwene GE; Eleswarapu S; Joshi SH; Sturm RM
    J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Oct; 16(5):547-554. PubMed ID: 32980263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laser scanner for 3D reconstruction of a wound's edge and topology.
    Zhao YM; Currie EH; Kavoussi L; Rabbany SY
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2021 Oct; 16(10):1761-1773. PubMed ID: 34424457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wound area measurement with 3D transformation and smartphone images.
    Liu C; Fan X; Guo Z; Mo Z; Chang EI; Xu Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):724. PubMed ID: 31852433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Handheld 3-dimensional wound measuring system.
    Pavlovčič U; Jezeršek M
    Skin Res Technol; 2018 May; 24(2):326-333. PubMed ID: 29377336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Error rate of automated calculation for wound surface area using a digital photography.
    Yang S; Park J; Lee H; Lee JB; Lee BU; Oh BH
    Skin Res Technol; 2018 Feb; 24(1):117-122. PubMed ID: 28718523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementing a superimposition and measurement model for 3D sagittal analysis of therapy-induced changes in facial soft tissue: a pilot study.
    Hoefert CS; Bacher M; Herberts T; Krimmel M; Reinert S; Hoefert S; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2010 May; 71(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 20503004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The accuracy of a three-dimensional face model reconstructing method based on conventional clinical two-dimensional photos.
    Mao B; Li J; Tian Y; Zhou Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Sep; 22(1):413. PubMed ID: 36123646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.