120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38335742)
21. Monte Carlo calculation of detector perturbation and quality correction factors in a 1.5 T magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy small photon beams.
Cervantes Y; Duchaine J; Billas I; Duane S; Bouchard H
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Nov; 66(22):. PubMed ID: 34700311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. MR compatible detectors assessment for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning.
Chea M; Croisé M; Huet C; Bassinet C; Benadjaoud MA; Jenny C
Radiat Oncol; 2024 Mar; 19(1):40. PubMed ID: 38509543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Proton dosimetry in a magnetic field: Measurement and calculation of magnetic field correction factors for a plane-parallel ionization chamber.
Gebauer B; Baumann KS; Fuchs H; Georg D; Oborn BM; Looe HK; Lühr A
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2293-2305. PubMed ID: 37898105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Determination of the KQclinfclin,Qmsr fmsr correction factors for detectors used with an 800 MU/min CyberKnife(®) system equipped with fixed collimators and a study of detector response to small photon beams using a Monte Carlo method.
Moignier C; Huet C; Makovicka L
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071702. PubMed ID: 24989371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Water calorimetry in MR-linac: Direct measurement of absorbed dose and determination of chamber
D'Souza M; Nusrat H; Iakovenko V; Keller B; Sahgal A; Renaud J; Sarfehnia A
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6458-6469. PubMed ID: 32970325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Absolute dosimetry of a 1.5 T MR-guided accelerator-based high-energy photon beam in water and solid phantoms using Aerrow.
Renaud J; Sarfehnia A; Bancheri J; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1291-1304. PubMed ID: 31834640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Monte Carlo calculation of perturbation correction factors for air-filled ionization chambers in clinical proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT.
Baumann KS; Kaupa S; Bach C; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
Z Med Phys; 2021 May; 31(2):175-191. PubMed ID: 33775521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. ACPSEM position paper: dosimetry for magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators.
Begg J; Jelen U; Moutrie Z; Oliver C; Holloway L; Brown R;
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2023 Mar; 46(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 36806156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Consequences of air around an ionization chamber: Are existing solid phantoms suitable for reference dosimetry on an MR-linac?
Hackett SL; van Asselen B; Wolthaus JW; Kok JG; Woodings SJ; Lagendijk JJ; Raaymakers BW
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):3961. PubMed ID: 27370114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development and evaluation of a GEANT4-based Monte Carlo Model of a 0.35 T MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) linear accelerator.
Khan AU; Simiele EA; Lotey R; DeWerd LA; Yadav P
Med Phys; 2021 Apr; 48(4):1967-1982. PubMed ID: 33555052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Monte Carlo simulated beam quality and perturbation correction factors for ionization chambers in monoenergetic proton beams.
Kretschmer J; Dulkys A; Brodbek L; Stelljes TS; Looe HK; Poppe B
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5890-5905. PubMed ID: 32989779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Experimental verification of EGSnrc Monte Carlo calculated depth doses within a realistic parallel magnetic field in a polystyrene phantom.
Ghila A; Steciw S; Fallone BG; Rathee S
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4804-4815. PubMed ID: 28626920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [A Survey of Dosimetry in the Magnetic Field of MR-Linacs].
Sato Y; Abe K; Tsuneda M; Yasui K; Kawachi T; Tohyama N; Mizuno H; Fujita Y
Igaku Butsuri; 2023; 43(4):107-124. PubMed ID: 38417889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Output and ([Formula: see text]) correction factors measured and calculated in very small circular fields for microDiamond and EFD-3G detectors.
Alhakeem E; Zavgorodni S
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(15):155002. PubMed ID: 29952318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Monte Carlo simulation for proton dosimetry in magnetic fields: Fano test and magnetic field correction factors
Marot M; Jäger F; Greilich S; Karger CP; Jäkel O; Burigo LN
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Aug; 68(17):. PubMed ID: 37567226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Technical Note: Consistency of PTW30013 and FC65-G ion chamber magnetic field correction factors.
Woodings SJ; van Asselen B; van Soest TL; de Prez LA; Lagendijk JJW; Raaymakers BW; Wolthaus JWH
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3739-3745. PubMed ID: 31131902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. On the implementation of the plan-class specific reference field using multidimensional clustering of plan features and alternative strategies for improved dosimetry in modulated clinical linear accelerator treatments.
Desai VK; Labby ZE; DeWerd LA; Culberson WS
Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3621-3635. PubMed ID: 32337734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Small field correction factors determination for several active detectors using a Monte Carlo method in the Elekta Axesse linac equipped with circular cones.
Girardi A; Fiandra C; Giglioli FR; Gallio E; Ali OH; Ragona R
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 64(11):11NT01. PubMed ID: 31051491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. VMAT and IMRT plan-specific correction factors for linac-based ionization chamber dosimetry.
Desai VK; Labby ZE; Hyun MA; DeWerd LA; Culberson WS
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):913-924. PubMed ID: 30449040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Relative dosimetry with an MR-linac: Response of ion chambers, diamond, and diode detectors for off-axis, depth dose, and output factor measurements.
O'Brien DJ; Dolan J; Pencea S; Schupp N; Sawakuchi GO
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):884-897. PubMed ID: 29178457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
