120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38336133)
1. Editorial Comment on "Impact of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on Professional Decision-Making among Urology Applicants".
Hampson LA; Hacker EC
Urology; 2024 May; 187():56. PubMed ID: 38336133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Editorial Comment on "Impact of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on Professional Decision-Making among Urology Applicants".
Griebling TL
Urology; 2024 May; 187():55. PubMed ID: 38490279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reply to Editorial Comment on "Impact of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on Professional Decision-Making among Urology Applicants" by Griebling.
Velez D; Seideman CA
Urology; 2024 May; 187():57. PubMed ID: 38521209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Attitudes Among Society of Women in Urology Members Toward Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
Peters CE; Lee J; Holt SK; Wolff E; Gore JL; Seideman CA
Urology; 2023 Oct; 180():295-302. PubMed ID: 37390972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on Professional Decision-Making Among Urology Applicants.
Peters CE; Seideman CA; Kauderer S; Gore JL; Holt SK; Mehta A; Singer EA; Tabakin AL; Thavaseelan S; Vemulakonda V; Posid T; Velez D
Urology; 2024 May; 187():49-54. PubMed ID: 38431159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Society of Women in Urology (SWIU) Statement on Dobbs vs Jackson Women's Health Organization.
Seideman CA;
Urology; 2022 Oct; 168():12. PubMed ID: 35901999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the
Jozkowski KN; Bueno X; Turner RC; Crawford BL; Lo WJ
Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2233794. PubMed ID: 37565622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of
Herr A
Am J Law Med; 2023 Dec; 49(4):471-492. PubMed ID: 38563269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion needs expressed on Reddit after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision in the United States.
John JN; Martin ZC
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2024 Mar; 56(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 38439171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implications of
Palacio H
Am J Public Health; 2023 Apr; 113(4):388-389. PubMed ID: 36888955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Society for Medical Anthropology Statement on Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Buchbinder M; Mishtal J; Singer EO; Wendland CL
Med Anthropol Q; 2022 Dec; 36(4):433-441. PubMed ID: 36433774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Global workforce implications of Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization.
Strasser J; Ouedraogo R; Baird S; Coast E
Lancet; 2024 Jun; 403(10445):2669-2671. PubMed ID: 38795715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The unrecognized vulnerability to the practice of allergy posed by Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization.
Greenhawt M
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2022 Dec; 129(6):653-654. PubMed ID: 36007693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022): consequences one year on.
Ottley E; Szopa K; Fletcher J
Med Law Rev; 2023 Aug; 31(3):457-468. PubMed ID: 37491697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A LOSS OF FACE: The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act post Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
Roden GJ
Issues Law Med; 2023; 38(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 37642453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-Term Changes in Vasectomy Consults and Procedures Following
Zhu A; Nam CS; Gingrich D; Patel N; Black K; Andino JJ; Daignault-Newton S; Telang J; Dupree JM; Quallich S; Ohl D; Hadj-Moussa M
Urol Pract; 2024 May; 11(3):517-525. PubMed ID: 38315830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protecting our Patients and Trainees: The Complex Consequences of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Ruling.
Ponce SB; Bajaj A; Baniel C; Seldon C; Sim A; Franco I; Pinnix C; Fields E; Jimenez RB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2022 Nov; 114(3):393-395. PubMed ID: 35963469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.
Rader B; Upadhyay UD; Sehgal NKR; Reis BY; Brownstein JS; Hswen Y
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(20):2041-2047. PubMed ID: 36318194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Addressing Moral Distress After Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization : A Professional Virtues-Based Approach.
Chen R; Gordon M; Chervenak F; Coverdale J
Acad Med; 2024 Jan; 99(1):12-15. PubMed ID: 37816216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
