These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38340346)

  • 1. Banff scoring of kidney allograft biopsies: "Manual" application vs software-assisted sign-out.
    Demetris AJ; Lesniak AJ; Popp BA; Frencho RJ; Minervini MI; Nalesnik MA; El Hag MI; Hariharan S; Randhawa PS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2024 Jun; 161(6):543-552. PubMed ID: 38340346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thirty years of the International Banff Classification for Allograft Pathology: the past, present, and future of kidney transplant diagnostics.
    Loupy A; Mengel M; Haas M
    Kidney Int; 2022 Apr; 101(4):678-691. PubMed ID: 34922989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 2013 Banff Criteria for Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection Are Superior to 2007 Banff Criteria in the Diagnosis and Assessment of Renal Allograft Outcomes.
    Hassler J; Tanriover B; Ariyamutu V; Burguete D; Hendricks AR; Torrealba JR
    Transplant Proc; 2019; 51(6):1791-1795. PubMed ID: 31301854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital pathology evaluation of complement C4d component deposition in the kidney allograft biopsies is a useful tool to improve reproducibility of the scoring.
    Brazdziute E; Laurinavicius A
    Diagn Pathol; 2011 Mar; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. PubMed ID: 21489200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Banff Component Scoring-based Histologic Assessment of Bortezomib-based Antibody-mediated Rejection Therapy.
    Sadaka B; Ejaz NS; Shields AR; Cardi MA; Wadih G; Witte D; Abu Jawdeh BG; Alloway RR; Woodle ES
    Transplantation; 2015 Aug; 99(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 25803498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of the Banff classification of early renal allograft biopsies and correlation with outcome.
    Bates WD; Davies DR; Welsh K; Gray DW; Fuggle SV; Morris PJ
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1999 Oct; 14(10):2364-9. PubMed ID: 10528659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An automated histological classification system for precision diagnostics of kidney allografts.
    Yoo D; Goutaudier V; Divard G; Gueguen J; Astor BC; Aubert O; Raynaud M; Demir Z; Hogan J; Weng P; Smith J; Garro R; Warady BA; Zahr RS; Sablik M; Twombley K; Couzi L; Berney T; Boyer O; Duong-Van-Huyen JP; Giral M; Alsadi A; Gourraud PA; Morelon E; Le Quintrec M; Brouard S; Legendre C; Anglicheau D; Villard J; Zhong W; Kamar N; Bestard O; Djamali A; Budde K; Haas M; Lefaucheur C; Rabant M; Loupy A
    Nat Med; 2023 May; 29(5):1211-1220. PubMed ID: 37142762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using computer-assisted morphometrics of 5-year biopsies to identify biomarkers of late renal allograft loss.
    Denic A; Morales MC; Park WD; Smith BH; Kremers WK; Alexander MP; Cosio FG; Rule AD; Stegall MD
    Am J Transplant; 2019 Oct; 19(10):2846-2854. PubMed ID: 30947386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology.
    Racusen LC; Solez K; Colvin RB; Bonsib SM; Castro MC; Cavallo T; Croker BP; Demetris AJ; Drachenberg CB; Fogo AB; Furness P; Gaber LW; Gibson IW; Glotz D; Goldberg JC; Grande J; Halloran PF; Hansen HE; Hartley B; Hayry PJ; Hill CM; Hoffman EO; Hunsicker LG; Lindblad AS; Yamaguchi Y
    Kidney Int; 1999 Feb; 55(2):713-23. PubMed ID: 9987096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: updates and future directions.
    Solez K; Colvin RB; Racusen LC; Haas M; Sis B; Mengel M; Halloran PF; Baldwin W; Banfi G; Collins AB; Cosio F; David DS; Drachenberg C; Einecke G; Fogo AB; Gibson IW; Glotz D; Iskandar SS; Kraus E; Lerut E; Mannon RB; Mihatsch M; Nankivell BJ; Nickeleit V; Papadimitriou JC; Randhawa P; Regele H; Renaudin K; Roberts I; Seron D; Smith RN; Valente M
    Am J Transplant; 2008 Apr; 8(4):753-60. PubMed ID: 18294345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unsatisfactory reproducibility of interstitial inflammation scoring in allograft kidney biopsy.
    Huang SC; Lin YJ; Wen MC; Lin WC; Fang PW; Liang PI; Chuang HW; Chien HP; Chen TD
    Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):7095. PubMed ID: 37127772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Significance of Perivascular Aggregates in Kidney Allografts: Evaluation of 1-Year Protocol Biopsies Using Recent Banff Classification.
    Masutani K; Nakagawa K; Matsukuma Y; Ueki K; Ataka E; Tsuchimoto A; Okabe Y; Nakamura M; Kitazono T; Nakano T
    Transplant Proc; 2024 Apr; 56(3):499-504. PubMed ID: 38320868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A blinded retrospective analysis of renal allograft pathology using the Banff schema: implications for clinical management.
    Dean DE; Kamath S; Peddi VR; Schroeder TJ; First MR; Cavallo T
    Transplantation; 1999 Sep; 68(5):642-5. PubMed ID: 10507482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-assisted topological analysis of renal allograft inflammation adds to risk evaluation at diagnosis of humoral rejection.
    Sicard A; Meas-Yedid V; Rabeyrin M; Koenig A; Ducreux S; Dijoud F; Hervieu V; Badet L; Morelon E; Olivo-Marin JC; Dubois V; Thaunat O
    Kidney Int; 2017 Jul; 92(1):214-226. PubMed ID: 28318622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Key Points of the Banff 2019 Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology.
    Tsuji T
    Nephron; 2023; 147 Suppl 1():6-8. PubMed ID: 37231863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Archetype Analysis Identifies Distinct Profiles in Renal Transplant Recipients with Transplant Glomerulopathy Associated with Allograft Survival.
    Aubert O; Higgins S; Bouatou Y; Yoo D; Raynaud M; Viglietti D; Rabant M; Hidalgo L; Glotz D; Legendre C; Delahousse M; Shah N; Sis B; Campbell P; Mengel M; Jouven X; Duong Van Huyen JP; Lefaucheur C; Loupy A
    J Am Soc Nephrol; 2019 Apr; 30(4):625-639. PubMed ID: 30872323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of the Banff 2013 classification on the diagnosis of suspicious versus conclusive late antibody-mediated rejection in allografts without acute dysfunction.
    Gimeno J; Redondo D; Pérez-Sáez MJ; Naranjo-Hans D; Pascual J; Crespo M
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2016 Nov; 31(11):1938-1946. PubMed ID: 27312147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Significance of the Banff borderline biopsy.
    Schweitzer EJ; Drachenberg CB; Anderson L; Papadimetriou JC; Kuo PC; Johnson LB; Klassen DK; Hoehn-Saric E; Weir MR; Bartlett ST
    Am J Kidney Dis; 1996 Oct; 28(4):585-8. PubMed ID: 8840950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method to reduce variability in scoring antibody-mediated rejection in renal allografts: implications for clinical trials - a retrospective study.
    Smith B; Cornell LD; Smith M; Cortese C; Geiger X; Alexander MP; Ryan M; Park W; Morales Alvarez MC; Schinstock C; Kremers W; Stegall M
    Transpl Int; 2019 Feb; 32(2):173-183. PubMed ID: 30179275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Banff 2022 Kidney Meeting Work Plan: Data-driven refinement of the Banff Classification for renal allografts.
    Roufosse C; Naesens M; Haas M; Lefaucheur C; Mannon RB; Afrouzian M; Alachkar N; Aubert O; Bagnasco SM; Batal I; Bellamy COC; Broecker V; Budde K; Clahsen-Van Groningen M; Coley SM; Cornell LD; Dadhania D; Demetris AJ; Einecke G; Farris AB; Fogo AB; Friedewald J; Gibson IW; Horsfield C; Huang E; Husain SA; Jackson AM; Kers J; Kikić Ž; Klein A; Kozakowski N; Liapis H; Mangiola M; Montgomery RA; Nankinvell B; Neil DAH; Nickerson P; Rabant M; Randhawa P; Riella LV; Rosales I; Royal V; Sapir-Pichhadze R; Sarder P; Sarwal M; Schinstock C; Stegall M; Solez K; van der Laak J; Wiebe C; Colvin RB; Loupy A; Mengel M
    Am J Transplant; 2024 Mar; 24(3):350-361. PubMed ID: 37931753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.