These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38340824)

  • 1. Toward a remote sensing method based on commercial LiDAR sensors for the measurement of spray drift and potential drift reduction.
    Li L; Zhang R; Chen L; Hewitt AJ; He X; Ding C; Tang Q; Liu B
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Mar; 918():170819. PubMed ID: 38340824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spray drift evaluation with point clouds data of 3D LiDAR as a potential alternative to the sampling method.
    Li L; Zhang R; Chen L; Liu B; Zhang L; Tang Q; Ding C; Zhang Z; Hewitt AJ
    Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():939733. PubMed ID: 35923876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of Spray Drift with a Specifically Designed Lidar System.
    Gregorio E; Torrent X; Planas de Martí S; Solanelles F; Sanz R; Rocadenbosch F; Masip J; Ribes-Dasi M; Rosell-Polo JR
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Apr; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 27070613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eye-safe lidar system for pesticide spray drift measurement.
    Gregorio E; Rocadenbosch F; Sanz R; Rosell-Polo JR
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Feb; 15(2):3650-70. PubMed ID: 25658395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of spray deposition, drift and mass balance from unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer using an artificial vineyard.
    Wang C; Herbst A; Zeng A; Wongsuk S; Qiao B; Qi P; Bonds J; Overbeck V; Yang Y; Gao W; He X
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jul; 777():146181. PubMed ID: 33689892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of a terrestrial LIDAR sensor for drift detection in vineyard spraying.
    Gil E; Llorens J; Llop J; Fàbregas X; Gallart M
    Sensors (Basel); 2013 Jan; 13(1):516-34. PubMed ID: 23282583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of spray drift and buffer zones in 3D crops using the ISO standard and new LiDAR methodologies.
    Torrent X; Gregorio E; Rosell-Polo JR; Arnó J; Peris M; van de Zande JC; Planas S
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 714():136666. PubMed ID: 31986387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Field evaluation of spray drift and environmental impact using an agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer.
    Wang G; Han Y; Li X; Andaloro J; Chen P; Hoffmann WC; Han X; Chen S; Lan Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Oct; 737():139793. PubMed ID: 32526578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of spray drift potential reduction for hollow-cone nozzles: Part 2. LiDAR technique.
    Gregorio E; Torrent X; Planas S; Rosell-Polo JR
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Oct; 687():967-977. PubMed ID: 31412500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 2: wind tunnel experiments.
    Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):757-61. PubMed ID: 19226825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.
    Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Droplet Size, Coverage, and Drift Potential from UAV Application Methods and Ground Application Methods on Row Crops.
    Gibbs J; Peters TM; Heck LP
    Trans ASABE; 2021; 64(3):819-828. PubMed ID: 37667776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of air support on droplet characteristics and spray drift.
    Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 18399426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spray Drift from Three Airblast Sprayer Technologies in a Modern Orchard Work Environment.
    Kasner EJ; Fenske RA; Hoheisel GA; Galvin K; Blanco MN; Seto EYW; Yost MG
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2020 Jan; 64(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 31786605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and assessment of a novel servo-controlled spraying system for real time adjustment of the orientation angle of the nozzles of a boom sprayer.
    Bayat A; İtmeç M; Özlüoymak ÖB
    Pest Manag Sci; 2023 Nov; 79(11):4439-4450. PubMed ID: 37405577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Off-target loss in ornamental nurseries with different spray techniques.
    Zhu H; Derksen RC; Krause CR; Zondag RH
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 20218508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental, bystander and resident exposure from orchard applications using an agricultural unmanned aerial spraying system.
    Dubuis PH; Droz M; Melgar A; Zürcher UA; Zarn JA; Gindro K; König SLB
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jul; 881():163371. PubMed ID: 37044339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of flight velocity on droplet deposition and drift of combined pesticides sprayed using an unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer in a peach orchard.
    Li L; Hu Z; Liu Q; Yi T; Han P; Zhang R; Pan L
    Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():981494. PubMed ID: 36247584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Real-Time Monitoring of Spray Drift from Three Different Orchard Sprayers.
    Blanco MN; Fenske RA; Kasner EJ; Yost MG; Seto E; Austin E
    Chemosphere; 2019 May; 222():46-55. PubMed ID: 30690400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DRIFT POTENTIAL OF TILTED SHIELDED ROTARY ATOMISERS BASED ON WIND TUNNEL MEASUREMENTS.
    Salah SO; Massinon M; De Cock N; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2015; 80(3):303-12. PubMed ID: 27141728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.