These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38340824)
1. Toward a remote sensing method based on commercial LiDAR sensors for the measurement of spray drift and potential drift reduction. Li L; Zhang R; Chen L; Hewitt AJ; He X; Ding C; Tang Q; Liu B Sci Total Environ; 2024 Mar; 918():170819. PubMed ID: 38340824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spray drift evaluation with point clouds data of 3D LiDAR as a potential alternative to the sampling method. Li L; Zhang R; Chen L; Liu B; Zhang L; Tang Q; Ding C; Zhang Z; Hewitt AJ Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():939733. PubMed ID: 35923876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of Spray Drift with a Specifically Designed Lidar System. Gregorio E; Torrent X; Planas de Martí S; Solanelles F; Sanz R; Rocadenbosch F; Masip J; Ribes-Dasi M; Rosell-Polo JR Sensors (Basel); 2016 Apr; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 27070613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eye-safe lidar system for pesticide spray drift measurement. Gregorio E; Rocadenbosch F; Sanz R; Rosell-Polo JR Sensors (Basel); 2015 Feb; 15(2):3650-70. PubMed ID: 25658395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of spray deposition, drift and mass balance from unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer using an artificial vineyard. Wang C; Herbst A; Zeng A; Wongsuk S; Qiao B; Qi P; Bonds J; Overbeck V; Yang Y; Gao W; He X Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jul; 777():146181. PubMed ID: 33689892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk assessment of environmental and bystander exposure from agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle sprayers in golden coconut plantations: Effects of droplet size and spray volume. Lan X; Wang J; Chen P; Liang Q; Zhang L; Ma C Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2024 Sep; 282():116675. PubMed ID: 38971099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a terrestrial LIDAR sensor for drift detection in vineyard spraying. Gil E; Llorens J; Llop J; Fàbregas X; Gallart M Sensors (Basel); 2013 Jan; 13(1):516-34. PubMed ID: 23282583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of spray drift and buffer zones in 3D crops using the ISO standard and new LiDAR methodologies. Torrent X; Gregorio E; Rosell-Polo JR; Arnó J; Peris M; van de Zande JC; Planas S Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 714():136666. PubMed ID: 31986387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Field evaluation of spray drift and environmental impact using an agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer. Wang G; Han Y; Li X; Andaloro J; Chen P; Hoffmann WC; Han X; Chen S; Lan Y Sci Total Environ; 2020 Oct; 737():139793. PubMed ID: 32526578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of spray drift potential reduction for hollow-cone nozzles: Part 2. LiDAR technique. Gregorio E; Torrent X; Planas S; Rosell-Polo JR Sci Total Environ; 2019 Oct; 687():967-977. PubMed ID: 31412500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 2: wind tunnel experiments. Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):757-61. PubMed ID: 19226825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model. Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Droplet Size, Coverage, and Drift Potential from UAV Application Methods and Ground Application Methods on Row Crops. Gibbs J; Peters TM; Heck LP Trans ASABE; 2021; 64(3):819-828. PubMed ID: 37667776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adjuvant use for the management of pesticide drift, leaching and runoff. Hewitt AJ Pest Manag Sci; 2024 Oct; 80(10):4819-4827. PubMed ID: 38895885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of air support on droplet characteristics and spray drift. Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 18399426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the potential spray drift of a six-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer using a test bench and airborne drift collectors under low wind velocities: impact of atomization characteristics and application parameters. Wongsuk S; Zhu Z; Zheng A; Qi P; Li Y; Huang Z; Han H; Wang C; He X Pest Manag Sci; 2024 Dec; 80(12):6053-6067. PubMed ID: 39030971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spray Drift from Three Airblast Sprayer Technologies in a Modern Orchard Work Environment. Kasner EJ; Fenske RA; Hoheisel GA; Galvin K; Blanco MN; Seto EYW; Yost MG Ann Work Expo Health; 2020 Jan; 64(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 31786605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and assessment of a novel servo-controlled spraying system for real time adjustment of the orientation angle of the nozzles of a boom sprayer. Bayat A; İtmeç M; Özlüoymak ÖB Pest Manag Sci; 2023 Nov; 79(11):4439-4450. PubMed ID: 37405577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Off-target loss in ornamental nurseries with different spray techniques. Zhu H; Derksen RC; Krause CR; Zondag RH Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 20218508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental, bystander and resident exposure from orchard applications using an agricultural unmanned aerial spraying system. Dubuis PH; Droz M; Melgar A; Zürcher UA; Zarn JA; Gindro K; König SLB Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jul; 881():163371. PubMed ID: 37044339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]