These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38341089)

  • 1. Diagnostic accuracy of the Oakland score versus haemoglobin for predicting outcomes in lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Garcia-Iglesias P; Machlab S; Martinez-Bauer E; Lira A; Campo R; Marín S; Raurich-Seguí M; Calvet X; Brullet E
    Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38341089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An External Validation Study of the Oakland and Glasgow-Blatchford Scores for Predicting Adverse Outcomes of Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in an Asian Population.
    Quach DT; Vo UP; Nguyen NT; Le LT; Vo MH; Ho PT; Nguyen TN; Bo PK; Nguyen NH; Vu KT; Van Dang M; Dinh MC; Nguyen TQ; Van Nguyen X; Le ST; Tran CP
    Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2021; 2021():8674367. PubMed ID: 33505461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NOBLADS-External Validation of a Risk Scoring System for Severe Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Brito M; Patita M; Nunes G; Canhoto M; Fonseca J
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Feb; 65(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 34636778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. External Validation of the Oakland Score to Assess Safe Hospital Discharge Among Adult Patients With Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the US.
    Oakland K; Kothiwale S; Forehand T; Jackson E; Bucknall C; Sey MSL; Singh S; Jairath V; Perlin J
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e209630. PubMed ID: 32633766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Risk Scores for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Li C; Linghu E; Chen C
    Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2024; 2024():3111414. PubMed ID: 38550954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. External Validation of the Oakland Score for Predicting Safe Discharge in Patients Presenting With Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding at the William Harvey Hospital in the United Kingdom.
    Whiteway J; Yim S; Leong N; Shah A
    Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e55497. PubMed ID: 38440205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Derivation, validation, and comparison of a new prognostic scoring system for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Smith C; Leggett G; Jayaprakash A; Khan M; Thomson JM; Vijayan B; Fraser A; Leeds JS
    DEN Open; 2024 Apr; 4(1):e323. PubMed ID: 38089922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Risk Scores for Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Almaghrabi M; Gandhi M; Guizzetti L; Iansavichene A; Yan B; Wilson A; Oakland K; Jairath V; Sey M
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 May; 5(5):e2214253. PubMed ID: 35622365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single center assessment of the role of Oakland score among patients admitted for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Nieto LM; Bezabih Y; Narvaez SI; Rouse C; Perry C; Vega KJ; Kinnucan J
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2024 Jul; 24(1):225. PubMed ID: 39009983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. External validation of the SHA
    Gonzalez-Gonzalez L; Iborra I; Fortuny M; Mañosa M; Calm A; Colan J; Cañete F; Caballero N; Calafat M; Domènech E
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38902406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development, Validation, and Comparative Assessment of an International Scoring System to Determine Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Oakland K; Kahan BC; Guizzetti L; Martel M; Bryant RV; Brahmania M; Singh S; Nguyen NQ; Sey MSL; Barkun A; Jairath V
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 17(6):1121-1129.e2. PubMed ID: 30268566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. External Validation of the Oakland Score for Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Raqi I; Potier P; Lagasse JP
    Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e57264. PubMed ID: 38686245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. External validation of the Oakland Score to assess safe hospital discharge among adult patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding in a single New Zealand Centre.
    Amer M; Haddow JB
    ANZ J Surg; 2024 Apr; 94(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 38059545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Prospective, Multicenter Study of the AIMS65 Score Compared With the Glasgow-Blatchford Score in Predicting Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Outcomes.
    Abougergi MS; Charpentier JP; Bethea E; Rupawala A; Kheder J; Nompleggi D; Liang P; Travis AC; Saltzman JR
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2016 Jul; 50(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 26302496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.
    Robertson M; Ng J; Abu Shawish W; Swaine A; Skardoon G; Huynh A; Deshpande S; Low ZY; Sievert W; Angus P
    Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rockall risk score in predicting 30 days non-variceal upper gastrointestinal rebleeding in a Malaysian population.
    Lip HT; Heah HT; Huei TJ; Premaa S; Sarojah A
    Med J Malaysia; 2016 Oct; 71(5):225-230. PubMed ID: 28064286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.