BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38341881)

  • 1. Value of
    Zhang J; Jin F; Li C; Jiang W; Liu C; Zeng L; Jiang Y; Xu A; Fang N; Wang Y
    Clin Imaging; 2024 Apr; 108():110100. PubMed ID: 38341881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recurrent bladder carcinoma: clinical and prognostic role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT.
    Alongi P; Caobelli F; Gentile R; Stefano A; Russo G; Albano D; Baldari S; Gilardi MC; Midiri M
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Feb; 44(2):224-233. PubMed ID: 27565154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk stratification in patients with advanced-stage breast cancer by pretreatment [(18) F]FDG PET/CT.
    Chen S; Ibrahim NK; Yan Y; Wong ST; Wang H; Wong FC
    Cancer; 2015 Nov; 121(22):3965-74. PubMed ID: 26249241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The correlation of
    Qu YH; Long N; Ran C; Sun J
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Mar; 23(3):620-627. PubMed ID: 32683540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Prognostic value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer].
    Ding CY; Guo Z; Li YY; Li TR
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 39(11):828-834. PubMed ID: 29151289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic implication of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with recurrent papillary thyroid cancer.
    Kang JH; Jung DW; Pak KJ; Kim IJ; Kim HJ; Cho JK; Shin SC; Wang SG; Lee BJ
    Head Neck; 2018 Jan; 40(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 29130586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8.
    Peng L; Du B; Cui Y; Luan Q; Li Y; Li X
    Clin Lung Cancer; 2022 Nov; 23(7):608-619. PubMed ID: 36089482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic significance of metabolic parameters measured by
    Chang H; Lee SJ; Lim J; Lee JS; Kim YJ; Lee WW
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2019 May; 145(5):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 30900157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on
    Hui Z; Wei F; Ren H; Xu W; Ren X
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2020 Oct; 146(10):2595-2605. PubMed ID: 32494919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic impact of maximum standardized uptake value on
    Qiu X; Liang H; Zhong W; Zhao J; Chen M; Zhu Z; Xu Y; Wang M
    Thorac Cancer; 2021 Mar; 12(6):845-853. PubMed ID: 33512768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The correlation between PD-L1 expression and metabolic parameters of
    Xu X; Li J; Yang Y; Sang S; Deng S
    Clin Imaging; 2022 Sep; 89():120-127. PubMed ID: 35797878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does Measurement of First-Order and Heterogeneity Parameters Improve Response Assessment of Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer Compared to SUV
    Azad GK; Cousin F; Siddique M; Taylor B; Goh V; Cook GJR
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Aug; 21(4):781-789. PubMed ID: 30250989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic Significance of FDG Uptake of Bone Marrow on PET/CT in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Curative Surgical Resection.
    Lee JW; Na JO; Kang DY; Lee SY; Lee SM
    Clin Lung Cancer; 2017 Mar; 18(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 27495385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    Li Y; Wu X; Huang Y; Bian D; Jiang L
    Ann Nucl Med; 2020 May; 34(5):314-321. PubMed ID: 32088884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 18F-FDG PET/CT and circulating tumor cells in treatment-naive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Zhang F; Wu X; Zhu J; Huang Y; Song X; Jiang L
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Sep; 48(10):3250-3259. PubMed ID: 33630146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic performance and prognostic value of preoperative
    Chen S; Zhao Y; Tang Q; Wu C; Wang A; Ma L; Zhang X; Chen J; Gao Y; Liao X; Feng N; Fan Y; Zhang J; Li X; Liu M
    Cancer Imaging; 2022 Nov; 22(1):65. PubMed ID: 36435856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic value of
    Lee JR; Almuhaimid TM; Roh JL; Oh JS; Kim SJ; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
    J Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 118(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 30132891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting the accuracy of
    Kutluturk K; Simsek A; Comak A; Gonultas F; Unal B; Kekilli E
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jan; 22(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 30666022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The prognostic value of SUV
    Diao W; Tian F; Jia Z
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Aug; 105():1-7. PubMed ID: 30017264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.