These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38342526)
21. Production of coffee (Coffea arabica) inoculated with yeasts: impact on quality. Martins PMM; Ribeiro LS; Miguel MGDCP; Evangelista SR; Schwan RF J Sci Food Agric; 2019 Oct; 99(13):5638-5645. PubMed ID: 31124153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Coinoculation of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts increases the quality of wet fermented Arabica coffee. Cassimiro DMJ; Batista NN; Fonseca HC; Naves JAO; Dias DR; Schwan RF Int J Food Microbiol; 2022 May; 369():109627. PubMed ID: 35305516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reduction of Tinoco NAB; Pacheco S; Godoy RLO; Bizzo HR; de Aguiar PF; Leite SGF; Rezende CM Food Res Int; 2019 Jan; 115():487-492. PubMed ID: 30599969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Wet fermentation of Coffea canephora by lactic acid bacteria and yeasts using the self-induced anaerobic fermentation (SIAF) method enhances the coffee quality. Cassimiro DMJ; Batista NN; Fonseca HC; Oliveira Naves JA; Coelho JM; Bernardes PC; Dias DR; Schwan RF Food Microbiol; 2023 Apr; 110():104161. PubMed ID: 36462817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Traditional management of microorganisms in fermented beverages from cactus fruits in Mexico: an ethnobiological approach. Ojeda-Linares CI; Vallejo M; Lappe-Oliveras P; Casas A J Ethnobiol Ethnomed; 2020 Jan; 16(1):1. PubMed ID: 31924218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ecological diversity, evolution and metabolism of microbial communities in the wet fermentation of Australian coffee beans. Elhalis H; Cox J; Zhao J Int J Food Microbiol; 2020 May; 321():108544. PubMed ID: 32086129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Microbial diversity and chemical characteristics of Coffea canephora grown in different environments and processed by dry method. Pereira PV; Bravim DG; Grillo RP; Bertoli LD; Osório VM; da Silva Oliveira D; da Cruz Pedrozo Miguel MG; Schwan RF; de Assis Silva S; Coelho JM; Bernardes PC World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2021 Feb; 37(3):51. PubMed ID: 33594606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of Various Processing Parameters on the Microbial Community Dynamics, Metabolomic Profiles, and Cup Quality During Wet Coffee Processing. Zhang SJ; De Bruyn F; Pothakos V; Contreras GF; Cai Z; Moccand C; Weckx S; De Vuyst L Front Microbiol; 2019; 10():2621. PubMed ID: 31798557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. New propositions about coffee wet processing: Chemical and sensory perspectives. Pereira LL; Guarçoni RC; Pinheiro PF; Osório VM; Pinheiro CA; Moreira TR; Ten Caten CS Food Chem; 2020 Apr; 310():125943. PubMed ID: 31816532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Characterization of the Rhizosphere Bacterial Microbiome and Coffee Bean Fermentation in the Castillo-Tambo and Bourbon Varieties in the Popayán-Colombia Plateau. Pino AFS; Espinosa ZYD; Cabrera EVR BMC Plant Biol; 2023 Apr; 23(1):217. PubMed ID: 37098489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Organic acids produced during fermentation and sensory perception in specialty coffee using yeast starter culture. Bressani APP; Martinez SJ; Sarmento ABI; Borém FM; Schwan RF Food Res Int; 2020 Feb; 128():108773. PubMed ID: 31955746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Espresso coffee design based on non-monotonic granulometric distribution of aromatic profile. De Vivo A; Tricarico MC; Sarghini F Food Res Int; 2019 Sep; 123():650-661. PubMed ID: 31285015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Microbiomes associated with Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora in four different floristic domains of Brazil. Veloso TGR; da Silva MCS; Moreira TR; da Luz JMR; Moreli AP; Kasuya MCM; Pereira LL Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18477. PubMed ID: 37898712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of three post-harvest methods and roasting degree on sensory profile of Turkish coffee assessed by Turkish and Brazilian panelists. Elmacı İ; Gok I J Sci Food Agric; 2021 Oct; 101(13):5368-5377. PubMed ID: 33650176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Inoculation of starter cultures in a semi-dry coffee (Coffea arabica) fermentation process. Evangelista SR; Miguel MG; Cordeiro Cde S; Silva CF; Pinheiro AC; Schwan RF Food Microbiol; 2014 Dec; 44():87-95. PubMed ID: 25084650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biogenic amine profile in unripe Arabica coffee beans processed according to dry and wet methods. Dias EC; Pereira RG; Borém FM; Mendes E; de Lima RR; Fernandes JO; Casal S J Agric Food Chem; 2012 Apr; 60(16):4120-5. PubMed ID: 22429054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Rhizosphere Microbiomes of Five Species of Coffee Trees. de Sousa LP; Guerreiro-Filho O; Mondego JMC Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Apr; 10(2):e0044422. PubMed ID: 35289671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Fermentation of Coffea canephora inoculated with yeasts: Microbiological, chemical, and sensory characteristics. da Silva BL; Pereira PV; Bertoli LD; Silveira DL; Batista NN; Pinheiro PF; de Souza Carneiro J; Schwan RF; de Assis Silva S; Coelho JM; Bernardes PC Food Microbiol; 2021 Sep; 98():103786. PubMed ID: 33875214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]