120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38342661)
21. An interpretable machine learning prognostic system for risk stratification in oropharyngeal cancer.
Alabi RO; Almangush A; Elmusrati M; Leivo I; Mäkitie AA
Int J Med Inform; 2022 Dec; 168():104896. PubMed ID: 36279655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Interpretable machine learning for in-hospital mortality risk prediction in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary interventions.
Shakhgeldyan KI; Kuksin NS; Domzhalov IG; Rublev VY; Geltser BI
Comput Biol Med; 2024 Mar; 170():107953. PubMed ID: 38224666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An explainable supervised machine learning predictor of acute kidney injury after adult deceased donor liver transplantation.
Zhang Y; Yang D; Liu Z; Chen C; Ge M; Li X; Luo T; Wu Z; Shi C; Wang B; Huang X; Zhang X; Zhou S; Hei Z
J Transl Med; 2021 Jul; 19(1):321. PubMed ID: 34321016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Application of machine learning model in predicting the likelihood of blood transfusion after hip fracture surgery.
Chen X; Pan J; Li Y; Tang R
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2023 Nov; 35(11):2643-2656. PubMed ID: 37733228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interpretable prediction of mortality in liver transplant recipients based on machine learning.
Zhang X; Gavaldà R; Baixeries J
Comput Biol Med; 2022 Dec; 151(Pt A):106188. PubMed ID: 36306583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predicting sepsis in-hospital mortality with machine learning: a multi-center study using clinical and inflammatory biomarkers.
Zhang G; Shao F; Yuan W; Wu J; Qi X; Gao J; Shao R; Tang Z; Wang T
Eur J Med Res; 2024 Mar; 29(1):156. PubMed ID: 38448999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Major Complications After Cytoreductive Surgery.
Deng H; Eftekhari Z; Carlin C; Veerapong J; Fournier KF; Johnston FM; Dineen SP; Powers BD; Hendrix R; Lambert LA; Abbott DE; Vande Walle K; Grotz TE; Patel SH; Clarke CN; Staley CA; Abdel-Misih S; Cloyd JM; Lee B; Fong Y; Raoof M
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 May; 5(5):e2212930. PubMed ID: 35612856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury after Extracorporeal Cardiac Surgery (CSA-AKI) by Machine Learning Algorithms.
Tong Y; Niu X; Liu F
Heart Surg Forum; 2023 Oct; 26(5):E537-E551. PubMed ID: 37920093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Exploring the significance of novel immune-related gene signatures in the prognosis and immune features of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Chen B; Hu C; Jiang L; Xiang Z; Zuo Z; Lin Y; Liu C
Int Immunopharmacol; 2021 Mar; 92():107359. PubMed ID: 33465729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. CVD22: Explainable artificial intelligence determination of the relationship of troponin to D-Dimer, mortality, and CK-MB in COVID-19 patients.
Kırboğa KK; Küçüksille EU; Naldan ME; Işık M; Gülcü O; Aksakal E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 May; 233():107492. PubMed ID: 36965300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Immune-Stromal Score Signature: Novel Prognostic Tool of the Tumor Microenvironment in Lung Adenocarcinoma.
Qi X; Qi C; Qin B; Kang X; Hu Y; Han W
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():541330. PubMed ID: 33072571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma associated immune-gene signature as a novo risk factor for clinical prognosis prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Dai L; Mugaanyi J; Cai X; Lu C; Lu C
Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11944. PubMed ID: 35831362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantification of m6A RNA methylation modulators pattern was a potential biomarker for prognosis and associated with tumor immune microenvironment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Wang L; Zhang S; Li H; Xu Y; Wu Q; Shen J; Li T; Xu Y
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jul; 21(1):876. PubMed ID: 34332578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Identification of a tumor microenvironment-related seven-gene signature for predicting prognosis in bladder cancer.
Wang Z; Tu L; Chen M; Tong S
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(1):692. PubMed ID: 34112144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Identification of the Real Hub Gene and Construction of a Novel Prognostic Signature for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Based on the Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator Algorithms.
Yuan Q; Ren J; Wang Z; Ji L; Deng D; Shang D
Front Genet; 2021; 12():692953. PubMed ID: 34490033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Predicting Colorectal Cancer Survival Using Time-to-Event Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Yang X; Qiu H; Wang L; Wang X
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Oct; 25():e44417. PubMed ID: 37883174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Construction and Validation of an Immune-Based Prognostic Model for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Based on Public Databases.
Mao M; Ling H; Lin Y; Chen Y; Xu B; Zheng R
Front Genet; 2021; 12():702102. PubMed ID: 34335699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Prognostic Model of m5C Related immune Genes in Lung Adenocarcinoma.
Cao X; Ji Y; Li J; Liu Z; Chen C
Cancer Control; 2024; 31():10732748241237414. PubMed ID: 38537151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Using Automated Machine Learning to Predict the Mortality of Patients With COVID-19: Prediction Model Development Study.
Ikemura K; Bellin E; Yagi Y; Billett H; Saada M; Simone K; Stahl L; Szymanski J; Goldstein DY; Reyes Gil M
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Feb; 23(2):e23458. PubMed ID: 33539308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Explainable machine learning model to predict refeeding hypophosphatemia.
Choi TY; Chang MY; Heo S; Jang JY
Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2021 Oct; 45():213-219. PubMed ID: 34620320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
