These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38343383)

  • 1. Intra-mediary expertise: Trans-science and expert understanding of the public.
    Kumaki H
    Soc Stud Sci; 2024 Aug; 54(4):512-535. PubMed ID: 38343383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical Issues Related to the Promotion of a "100 mSv Threshold Assumption" in Japan after the Fukushima Nuclear Accident in 2011: Background and Consequences.
    Tsuda T; Lindahl L; Tokinobu A
    Curr Environ Health Rep; 2017 Jun; 4(2):119-129. PubMed ID: 28429301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Review of engagement activities to promote awareness of radiation and its associated risk amongst the Japanese public before and after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident.
    Sakoda A; Nomura N; Kuroda Y; Kono T; Naito W; Yoshida H
    J Radiol Prot; 2021 Nov; 41(4):. PubMed ID: 34816800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiological protection issues arising during and after the Fukushima nuclear reactor accident.
    González AJ; Akashi M; Boice JD; Chino M; Homma T; Ishigure N; Kai M; Kusumi S; Lee JK; Menzel HG; Niwa O; Sakai K; Weiss W; Yamashita S; Yonekura Y
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Sep; 33(3):497-571. PubMed ID: 23803462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Further disorientation in the hall of mirrors.
    Wynne B
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 24434714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. STS as science or politics?
    Collins H; Evans R; Weinel M
    Soc Stud Sci; 2017 Aug; 47(4):580-586. PubMed ID: 28639540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Healing Fukushima: Radiation hazards and disaster medicine in post-3.11 Japan.
    Loh SL; Amir S
    Soc Stud Sci; 2019 Jun; 49(3):333-354. PubMed ID: 31185875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diversity of Concerns in Recovery after a Nuclear Accident: A Perspective from Fukushima.
    Sato A; Lyamzina Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 29462905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hybrid regimes of knowledge? Challenges for constructing scientific evidence in the context of the GMO-debate.
    Böschen S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Jul; 16(5):508-20. PubMed ID: 19452181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Another implementation science is possible: engaging an 'intelligent public' in knowledge translation.
    Heinsch M; Cootes H; Tickner C
    Health Sociol Rev; 2023 Mar; 32(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 36880797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SAGE advice and political decision-making: 'Following the science' in times of epistemic uncertainty.
    Evans R
    Soc Stud Sci; 2022 Feb; 52(1):53-78. PubMed ID: 34963397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Ten Years from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident: Were the Predicted Effects Reported by Worldwide Experts Correct?].
    Yasuda H
    Igaku Butsuri; 2021; 41(3):127-133. PubMed ID: 34744123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Post-political uncertainties: Governing nuclear controversies in post-Fukushima Japan.
    Polleri M
    Soc Stud Sci; 2020 Aug; 50(4):567-588. PubMed ID: 31749407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Communicating With Residents About Risks Following the Fukushima Nuclear Accident.
    Murakami M; Sato A; Matsui S; Goto A; Kumagai A; Tsubokura M; Orita M; Takamura N; Kuroda Y; Ochi S
    Asia Pac J Public Health; 2017 Mar; 29(2_suppl):74S-89S. PubMed ID: 28330403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Science to the rescue or contingent progress? Comparing 10 years of public, expert and policy discourses on new and emerging science and technology in the United Kingdom.
    Smallman M
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Aug; 27(6):655-673. PubMed ID: 28490253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The benefits of acquiring interactional expertise: Why (some) philosophers of science should engage scientific communities.
    Plaisance KS
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2020 Oct; 83():53-62. PubMed ID: 32958281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. COVID-19 Science Policy, Experts, and Publics: Why Epistemic Democracy Matters in Ecological Crises.
    Boschele M
    OMICS; 2020 Aug; 24(8):479-482. PubMed ID: 32644877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy.
    Burgess MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 24434712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voluntary Health Registry of French Nationals after the Great East Japan Earthquake, Tsunami, and Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident: Methods, Results, Implications, and Feedback.
    Motreff Y; Pirard P; Lagrée C; Roudier C; Empereur-Bissonnet P
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2016 Jun; 31(3):326-9. PubMed ID: 27018710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.