These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38344276)
1. The power of meaningful numbers: Attorney guidance and jury deliberation improve the reliability and gist validity of damage awards. Reed K; Hans VP; Rotenstein V; Helm RK; Rodriguez A; McKendall P; Reyna VF Law Hum Behav; 2024 Apr; 48(2):83-103. PubMed ID: 38602803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of information and deliberation on the consistency of preferences for prioritization in health care - evidence from discrete choice experiments undertaken alongside citizens' juries. Whitty JA; Littlejohns P; Ratcliffe J; Rixon K; Wilson A; Kendall E; Burton P; Chalkidou K; Scuffham PA J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):1237-1249. PubMed ID: 37738383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal Decision-Making in an Adult Rape Case Involving DNA Evidence. Mecikalski AA; Golding JM; Burke KC; Neuschatz JS Violence Against Women; 2024 Apr; ():10778012241247199. PubMed ID: 38659414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Facial Expression Recognition for Measuring Jurors' Attention in Acoustic Jury Tests. Jamali R; Generosi A; Villafan JY; Mengoni M; Pelagalli L; Battista G; Martarelli M; Chiariotti P; Mansi SA; Arnesano M; Castellini P Sensors (Basel); 2024 Apr; 24(7):. PubMed ID: 38610510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of implicit narrator reliability on production of information. Houts AR; Levine WH Mem Cognit; 2024 Feb; 52(2):390-400. PubMed ID: 37759074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do cognitive abilities reduce eyewitness susceptibility to the misinformation effect? A systematic review. Brassil M; O'Mahony C; Greene CM Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38696106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The brain under sexual attack: A brief report on neurobiological disturbances in trauma memory. Dixon K Psychol Trauma; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38512167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Wise Adviser Trap: Catastrophic Decision-Making in Herodotus and Thucydides. Lunbeck E; Stone R J Hist Ideas; 2023; 84(3):417-439. PubMed ID: 38588287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Jury Duty: I Saw the Origin and the Aftermath. Schindler JM Anesth Analg; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38470844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cognitive and human factors in legal layperson decision making: Sources of bias in juror decision making. Curley LJ; Munro J; Dror IE Med Sci Law; 2022 Jul; 62(3):206-215. PubMed ID: 35175157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Jury decision making research: are researchers focusing on the mouse and not the elephant in the room? Nuñez N; McCrea SM; Culhane SE Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):439-51. PubMed ID: 21351132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of misinformation presented during jury deliberation on juror memory and decision-making. Cullen HJ; Dilevski N; Nitschke FT; Ribeiro G; Brind S; Woolley N Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1232228. PubMed ID: 38344276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory. Ruva CL; Guenther CC Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Jurors' cognitive depletion and performance during jury deliberation as a function of jury diversity and defendant race. Peter-Hagene L Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 43(3):232-249. PubMed ID: 31120276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation. Ruva CL; Guenther CC Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]