These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38344550)

  • 1. Clinical Evaluation of Single Versus Repeated Micro-Osteoperforations During Orthodontic Canine Retraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Hashem BA; El-Hassanein EH; El-Awady AA; Mohamed AA; Hashem MI; Alsarani MM; Hussein FA
    Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e52026. PubMed ID: 38344550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional assessment of the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction in adults with Class II malocclusion: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Alkebsi A; Al-Maaitah E; Al-Shorman H; Abu Alhaija E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jun; 153(6):771-785. PubMed ID: 29853235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effectiveness of Micro-osteoperforations during Canine Retraction: A Three-dimensional Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Alqadasi B; Aldhorae K; Halboub E; Mahgoub N; Alnasri A; Assiry A; Xia HY
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2019; 9(6):637-645. PubMed ID: 32039085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial.
    Aboalnaga AA; Salah Fayed MM; El-Ashmawi NA; Soliman SA
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Jun; 20(1):21. PubMed ID: 31155698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Canine and molar movement, rotation and tipping by NiTi coils versus elastomeric chains in first maxillary premolar extraction orthodontic adolescents: A randomized split-mouth study.
    Hashemzadeh H; Soleimani M; Golbar M; Dehghani Soltani A; Mirmalek SP
    Int Orthod; 2022 Mar; 20(1):100601. PubMed ID: 34866026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative effect of micro-osteoperforation and Photo-biomodulation on the rate of maxillary canine retraction: A split mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Bajaj I; Garg AK; Gupta DK; Singla L
    Clin Ter; 2022 Feb; 173(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 35147645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of mini-screw-facilitated micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a single-center, split-mouth, randomized, controlled trial.
    Babanouri N; Ajami S; Salehi P
    Prog Orthod; 2020 Mar; 21(1):7. PubMed ID: 32147751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of Flapless Laser Corticotomy in Upper and Lower Canine Retraction: A Split-mouth, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Bakr AR; Nadim MA; Sedky YW; El Kady AA
    Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37191. PubMed ID: 37159786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and expression of biomarkers: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Raghav P; Khera AK; Preeti P; Jain S; Mohan S; Tiwari A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(1):e2219403. PubMed ID: 35674571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of micro-osteoperforation of the alveolar bone by using mini-screw for acceleration of maxillary canine retraction in young adult orthodontic patients: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Golshah A; Moradi P; Nikkerdar N
    Int Orthod; 2021 Dec; 19(4):601-611. PubMed ID: 34696998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Frequency of Micro-osteoperforation on Miniscrew- supported Canine Retraction: A Single-centered, Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Venkatachalapathy S; Natarajan R; Ramachandran UM; Rajakumar P; Rangarajan S; Patil D; Manickavasagam V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Aug; 23(8):781-787. PubMed ID: 37283011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the efficacy of two-time versus one-time micro-osteoperforation on maxillary canine retraction in orthodontic patients: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Jaiswal AA; Siddiqui HP; Samrit VD; Duggal R; Kharbanda OP; Rajeswari MR
    Int Orthod; 2021 Sep; 19(3):415-424. PubMed ID: 34281788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Using Self-ligating Brackets on Maxillary Canine Retraction: A Split-mouth Design Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hassan SE; Hajeer MY; Alali OH; Kaddah AS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jun; 17(6):496-503. PubMed ID: 27484605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on rate of space closure by mini-implant supported maxillary anterior en-masse retraction: A randomized clinical trial.
    Raghav P; Khera AK; Bhasin P
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2021; 11(2):185-191. PubMed ID: 33598396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Corticotomy and Micro-osteoperforation during Canine Retraction: A Split-Mouth Design.
    Perez-Cisneros C; Elías-Boneta AR; Rivas-Tumanyan S; Rodríguez-Reyes M; Polo M
    P R Health Sci J; 2023 Dec; 42(4):311-317. PubMed ID: 38104288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of different micro-osteoperforation depths on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A single-center, single-blind, randomized clinical trial.
    Ozkan TH; Arici S
    Korean J Orthod; 2021 May; 51(3):157-165. PubMed ID: 33984223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics.
    Shpack N; Davidovitch M; Sarne O; Panayi N; Vardimon AD
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces.
    Yee JA; Türk T; Elekdağ-Türk S; Cheng LL; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):150.e1-9; discussion 150-1. PubMed ID: 19651334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of Flapless Cortico-Alveolar Perforations Using Mechanical Drills Versus Traditional Corticotomy on the Retraction of Maxillary Canines in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Alfailany DT; Hajeer MY; Al-Bitar MI; Alsino HI; Jaber ST; Brad B; Darwich K
    Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e44190. PubMed ID: 37641723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of Er,Cr Laser incision Corticotomy in Rapid Maxillary Canine Retraction: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Mahmoudzadeh M; Poormoradi B; Alijani S; Farhadian M; Kazemisaleh A
    J Lasers Med Sci; 2020; 11(4):442-449. PubMed ID: 33425295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.