These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38344550)

  • 21. Effects of miniscrew-facilitated micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement : A split-mouth, randomized controlled trial.
    Bolat Gümüş E; Kınsız E
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Apr; 84(Suppl 2):104-110. PubMed ID: 35024875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of physiodispenser assisted micro-osteoperforation on the rate of tooth movement and associated periodontal tissue status during individual canine retraction in first premolar extraction cases: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Thomas S; Das SK; Barik AK; Raj SC; Rajasekaran A; Mishra M
    J World Fed Orthod; 2021 Sep; 10(3):89-97. PubMed ID: 34112627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of micro-osteoperforations on orthodontic space closure investigated over 12 weeks: a split-mouth, randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Li J; Papadopoulou AK; Gandedkar N; Dalci K; Darendeliler MA; Dalci O
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Aug; 44(4):427-435. PubMed ID: 35134142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A CBCT assessment of bone density changes after accelerated orthodontic retraction of canine by microosteoperforations.
    Alfawazan AA; Manas A; Verghese Y; Kochhar AS; AlMogbel AM; Patil S
    J Orthod Sci; 2022; 11():26. PubMed ID: 35754424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the Effect of Combined Low Energy Laser Application and Micro-Osteoperforations versus the Effect of Application of Each Technique Separately On the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement.
    Abdelhameed AN; Refai WMM
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2018 Nov; 6(11):2180-2185. PubMed ID: 30559886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Canine retraction and anchorage loss: self-ligating versus conventional brackets in a randomized split-mouth study.
    da Costa Monini A; Júnior LG; Martins RP; Vianna AP
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 24592906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comprehensive comparison of canine retraction using NiTi closed coil springs vs elastomeric chains.
    Barsoum HA; ElSayed HS; El Sharaby FA; Palomo JM; Mostafa YA
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Jul; 91(4):441-448. PubMed ID: 34181721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of GUMMETAL® and stainless steel alloy during canine retraction: A pilot split-mouth randomized controlled trial.
    Ravlyk L; Warunek S; Covell D; Tanberg W; Al-Jewair T
    Int Orthod; 2023 Dec; 21(4):100810. PubMed ID: 37774499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tooth movement rate and anchorage lost during canine retraction:
    da C Monini A; Gandini LG; Vianna AP; Martins RP; Jacob HB
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Jul; 89(4):559-565. PubMed ID: 30741577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Three-dimensional assessment of accelerating orthodontic tooth movement-micro-osteoperforations vs piezocision: A randomized, parallel-group and split-mouth controlled clinical trial.
    Alqadasi B; Xia HY; Alhammadi MS; Hasan H; Aldhorae K; Halboub E
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Aug; 24(3):335-343. PubMed ID: 33124098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of lower canine retraction and loss of anchorage between conventional and self-ligating brackets: a single-center randomized split-mouth controlled trial.
    da Costa Monini A; Júnior LGG; Vianna AP; Martins RP
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1047-1053. PubMed ID: 27246754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Anchorage loss during canine retraction using intermittent versus continuous force distractions; a split mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Mowafy MI; Zaher AR
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 23021114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of Mini-implant assisted Micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement-A randomized clinical trial.
    Singh S; Jain AK; Prasad RR; Sahu A; Priya P; Kumari P
    J Orthod Sci; 2023; 12():62. PubMed ID: 38234639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Split-Mouth Design With Dual Force Cuspid Retractor and T-loop Segmental Arch: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nandan H; Kumar CS; Jha P
    Cureus; 2023 Feb; 15(2):e35288. PubMed ID: 36968913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of a ceramic active self-ligating bracket on retraction/tipping/ rotation of canine, premolar mesialization, and transverse arch dimensions: A preliminary single-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Moradinejad M; Ghorani N; Heidarpour M; Noori M; Rakhshan V
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2021; 18():81. PubMed ID: 34760072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of Periodontal Changes Adjacent to Extraction Sites during Upper Canine Retraction.
    Al-Jundi A; Sabbagh BA; Baskaradoss JK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb; 18(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 28174364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of micro-osteoperforations on root resorption and alveolar bone in en-masse retraction in young adults: A CBCT randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Chandorikar H; Bhad WA
    Int Orthod; 2023 Mar; 21(1):100714. PubMed ID: 36502787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the platelet-rich plasma compared to the injectable platelet-rich fibrin on the rate of maxillary canine retraction: a three-arm randomized controlled trial.
    Ammar AM; Al-Sabbagh R; Hajeer MY
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 37796117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.