These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38344550)

  • 41. Dento-Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis for rapid Orthodontic Canine Retraction.
    Kumar N; Prashantha G; Raikar S; Ranganath K; Mathew S; Nambiar S
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Dec; 5(6):31-41. PubMed ID: 24453442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparison of maxillary canine retraction into healed and recent extraction sites using cone beam computed tomography: a randomized clinical trial.
    Almaasarani SG; Rajeh N
    Angle Orthod; 2023 Jul; 93(4):382-389. PubMed ID: 37017438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of micro-osteoperforations performed with Propel system on tooth movement, pain/quality of life, anchorage loss, and root resorption: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dos Santos CCO; Mecenas P; de Castro Aragón MLS; Normando D
    Prog Orthod; 2020 Jul; 21(1):27. PubMed ID: 32715352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of laser corticotomy on canine retraction rate: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Toodehzaeim MH; Maybodi FR; Rafiei E; Toodehzaeim P; Karimi N
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Apr; 24(1):448. PubMed ID: 38609926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Miniscrew implant-supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics.
    Aboul-Ela SM; El-Beialy AR; El-Sayed KM; Selim EM; El-Mangoury NH; Mostafa YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 21300255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A clinical comparison between nickel titanium springs and elastomeric chains.
    Bokas J; Woods M
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16792244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Biological Anchorage and Canine Orthodontic Movement Rate with a New Technique for Micro-Osteoperforations.
    Arredondo A; Pérez D; Zapata-Noreña O; Ramírez C; Carvajal-Flórez Á; Arango E; Barbosa-Liz D; Gil J; Duque P; Gallego J; Castaño C; Plaza-Ruíz SP
    Case Rep Dent; 2022; 2022():5469453. PubMed ID: 35154834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of anchorage loss between conventional and self-ligating brackets during canine retraction - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Malik DES; Fida M; Afzal E; Irfan S
    Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 31866192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Rate of upper incisor retraction in Class II division 1 patients managed with palatal versus buccal miniscrew supported segmental orthodontics: Randomized parallel clinical trial.
    Zaher GR; Hafez AM; El-Bialy AA
    Int Orthod; 2023 Mar; 21(1):100710. PubMed ID: 36508850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluating the Efficacy of a Modified Piezo-Puncture Method on the Rate of Tooth Movement in Orthodontic Patients: A Clinical Study.
    Omidkhoda M; Radvar M; Azizi M; Dehghani M
    Turk J Orthod; 2020 Mar; 33(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 32284894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of canine retraction using modified Marcotte and T-loop retraction springs - A split-mouth, randomized clinical trial.
    Davis S; Sundareswaran S; James J
    J Orthod Sci; 2019; 8():9. PubMed ID: 31161132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparative Evaluation of Effect of Micro-Osteoperforation and Mechanical Vibration on Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Young Adults With Bimaxillary Protrusion.
    Wagh SS; Nehete A; Gulve N; Aher S; Patil D; Tambe M
    Cureus; 2023 Mar; 15(3):e36636. PubMed ID: 37155450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Does leukocyte-platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) cause long term acceleration in the rate of canine retraction? A split-mouth, two-arm parallel group, randomized control trial.
    Gupta S; Bhambri E; Sharma M; Shaikh MA; Zope A; Thoke B; Sorokhaibam M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2023; 28(5):e232388. PubMed ID: 37937683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of mini-implant facilitated micro-osteoperforations on the alignment of mandibular anterior crowding: A randomised controlled clinical trial.
    Al-Attar A; Nissan L; Almuzian M; Abid M
    J Orthod; 2022 Dec; 49(4):379-387. PubMed ID: 35575069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparative evaluation of the maxillary canine retraction rate and anchorage loss between two types of self-ligating brackets using sliding mechanics.
    Abu-Shahba R; Alassiry A
    J Orthod Sci; 2019; 8():3. PubMed ID: 31001495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction.
    Abbas NH; Sabet NE; Hassan IT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 27021451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Efficacy of elastic memory chains versus nickel-titanium coil springs in canine retraction: A two-center split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Khanemasjedi M; Moradinejad M; Javidi P; Niknam O; Jahromi NH; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):561-574. PubMed ID: 29153282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Analysis of canine retraction and anchorage loss in different facial types with and without piezocision: a split-mouth-design, randomized clinical trial.
    Al-A'athal HS; Al-Nimri K; Alhammadi MS
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Nov; 92(6):746-754. PubMed ID: 35852456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of diode laser (980 nm) on orthodontic tooth movement and interleukin 6 levels in gingival crevicular fluid in female subjects.
    Yassaei S; Aghili H; Afshari JT; Bagherpour A; Eslami F
    Lasers Med Sci; 2016 Dec; 31(9):1751-1759. PubMed ID: 27680969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of direct and indirect skeletal anchorage systems combined with 2 canine retraction techniques.
    Ozkan S; Bayram M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):763-770. PubMed ID: 27871702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.