These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38344793)

  • 21. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. United States v. Lyons: toward a new conception of legal insanity.
    Mossman D
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 3365479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A confusion of tongues: competence, insanity, psychiatry, and the law.
    Gutheil TG
    Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jun; 50(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 10375145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
    Klein DW
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
    Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
    Wing KR
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Recent developments in health law. Constitutional law: despite reservations, the second circuit defers to state court's determination that a preponderance of the evidence standard is constitutional for recommitment of NRRMDD defendants--Ernst J. v. Stonea.
    Wilkinson E
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(4):826-8. PubMed ID: 17199826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant's Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS).
    Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Carabellese F; Ferracuti S
    Transl Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 9(1):278. PubMed ID: 31699969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Indiana v. Davis: revisiting due process rights of permanently incompetent defendants.
    Morris DR; Parker GF
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 19767504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Public Perceptions of Moral Insanity in the 19th Century.
    Hanganu-Bresch C
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2019 Sep; 207(9):805-814. PubMed ID: 31464992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Supreme Court and the mentally disabled criminal defendant: recent developments.
    Perlin ML
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(4):391-409. PubMed ID: 3427241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Without thinking: impulsive aggression and criminal responsibility.
    Shuman DW; Gold LH
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(6):723-34. PubMed ID: 19039791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: Part IV: The insanity defense and the Ultimate Issue Rule.
    Goldstein RL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 2790225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Commentary: the insanity defense and youths in juvenile court.
    Rogers JE; Myers WC
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 24335320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Residential mental health assessment within Dutch criminal cases: a discussion.
    van der Leij JB; Jackson JL; Malsch M; Nijboer JF
    Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(5-6):691-702. PubMed ID: 11787076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Justifications for the insanity defence in Great Britain and the United States: the conflicting rationales of morality and compassion.
    Gostin LO
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(2):100-15. PubMed ID: 7317652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The insanity defence: from wild beasts to M'Naghten.
    Allnutt S; Samuels A; O'driscoll C
    Australas Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 15(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 17612881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    Hiromoto L; Sparr LF
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2023 Mar; 51(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 36627152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Schizotypal personality disorder and the insanity defense.
    Felthous AR
    J Forensic Sci; 1986 Jul; 31(3):1016-22. PubMed ID: 3734726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.