146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38345201)
1. Assessing quality assurance of multi-leaf collimator using the structural similarity index.
Zhang H; Zhang B; Lasio G; Chen S; Nasehi Tehrani J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 25(4):e14288. PubMed ID: 38345201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Insensitivity of machine log files to MLC leaf backlash and effect of MLC backlash on clinical dynamic MLC motion: An experimental investigation.
Barnes M; Pomare D; Doebrich M; Standen TS; Wolf J; Greer P; Simpson J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 23(9):e13660. PubMed ID: 35678793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Commissioning and quality assurance for VMAT delivery systems: An efficient time-resolved system using real-time EPID imaging.
Zwan BJ; Barnes MP; Hindmarsh J; Lim SB; Lovelock DM; Fuangrod T; O'Connor DJ; Keall PJ; Greer PB
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3909-3922. PubMed ID: 28564208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monitoring daily MLC positional errors using trajectory log files and EPID measurements for IMRT and VMAT deliveries.
Agnew A; Agnew CE; Grattan MW; Hounsell AR; McGarry CK
Phys Med Biol; 2014 May; 59(9):N49-63. PubMed ID: 24732210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Daily QA of linear accelerators using only EPID and OBI.
Sun B; Goddu SM; Yaddanapudi S; Noel C; Li H; Cai B; Kavanaugh J; Mutic S
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5584-94. PubMed ID: 26429233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is a weekly qualitative picket fence test sufficient? A proposed alternate EPID-based weekly MLC QA program.
Kalavagunta C; Xu H; Zhang B; Mossahebi S; MacFarlane M; Jiang K; Lee SW; Chen S; Sawant A; Gopal A; Yi B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 23(8):e13699. PubMed ID: 35856943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel method for routine quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Wang Q; Dai J; Zhang K
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101712. PubMed ID: 24089902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of MLC positioning deviations using log files and establishment of specific assessment parameters for different accelerators with IMRT and VMAT.
Lin X; Sun T; Liu X; Zhang G; Yin Y
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jul; 17(1):123. PubMed ID: 35842671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of QA software system analysis for the static picket fence test.
Boudet J; Aubignac L; Beneux A; Mazoyer F; Bessieres I
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 23(7):e13618. PubMed ID: 35570379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automating linear accelerator quality assurance.
Eckhause T; Al-Hallaq H; Ritter T; DeMarco J; Farrey K; Pawlicki T; Kim GY; Popple R; Sharma V; Perez M; Park S; Booth JT; Thorwarth R; Moran JM
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):6074-83. PubMed ID: 26429282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity study of an automated system for daily patient QA using EPID exit dose images.
Zhuang AH; Olch AJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):114-124. PubMed ID: 29508529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel technique for VMAT QA with EPID in cine mode on a Varian TrueBeam linac.
Liu B; Adamson J; Rodrigues A; Zhou F; Yin FF; Wu Q
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6683-700. PubMed ID: 24018655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A tool for patient-specific prediction of delivery discrepancies in machine parameters using trajectory log files.
Chuang KC; Giles W; Adamson J
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):978-990. PubMed ID: 33332618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic detection of MLC relative position errors for VMAT using the EPID-based picket fence test.
Christophides D; Davies A; Fleckney M
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 61(23):8340-8359. PubMed ID: 27811392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EPID sensitivity to delivery errors for pre-treatment verification of lung SBRT VMAT plans.
Alharthi T; Arumugam S; Vial P; Holloway L; Thwaites D
Phys Med; 2019 Mar; 59():37-46. PubMed ID: 30928064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An error detection method for real-time EPID-based treatment delivery quality assurance.
Alves VGL; Ahmed M; Aliotta E; Choi W; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 48(2):569-578. PubMed ID: 33314247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality assurance of VMAT on flattened and flattening filter-free accelerators using a high spatial resolution detector.
Matar FS; Wilkinson D; Davis J; Biasi G; Causer T; Fuduli I; Brace O; Stansook N; Carolan M; Rosenfeld AB; Petasecca M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 21(6):44-52. PubMed ID: 32277745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Impact of the Linac MLC and Gantry Sag in volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Milan T; Grogan G; Ebert MA; Rowshanfarzad P
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):1984-1994. PubMed ID: 30870581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An EPID-based system for gantry-resolved MLC quality assurance for VMAT.
Zwan BJ; Barnes MP; Fuangord T; Stanton CJ; O'Connor DJ; Keall PJ; Greer PB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):348-365. PubMed ID: 27685132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The comparison of VMAT test results for Clinac 2300C/D and TrueBeam accelerators.
Latala A; Fujak E; Walewska A; Kukołowicz P
Med Dosim; 2020 Autumn; 45(3):219-224. PubMed ID: 32008886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
